no, the const has no provision on interracial marriage or segregation in schools. In fact, both were legal. The right to a condom is rooted in the right to privacy. Do you think the furious five will revisit that?So? Your point?
Those rights were based on things and rights that already existed in the Constitution.
Show me where in the document abortion is a constitutional right, without citing the 14th Amendment.
The SCOTUS essentially amended the constitution to give a right that it did not guarantee. What it will (possibly) now do is send that issue back to the states, in accordance with the 10th Amendment. There is no national regulation or constitutional delegation of abortion regulation to the government.
In fact, the constitution DOESN'T EVEN SAY THE SUP CT CAN DECLARE LAWS UNCONST.