Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no, the const has no provision on interracial marriage or segregation in schools. In fact, both were legal. The right to a condom is rooted in the right to privacy. Do you think the furious five will revisit that?So? Your point?
Those rights were based on things and rights that already existed in the Constitution.
Show me where in the document abortion is a constitutional right, without citing the 14th Amendment.
The SCOTUS essentially amended the constitution to give a right that it did not guarantee. What it will (possibly) now do is send that issue back to the states, in accordance with the 10th Amendment. There is no national regulation or constitutional delegation of abortion regulation to the government.
Sure, and if their position was just about third trimester I could get on sorta the same page.Not for the baby who is seconds from birth it isn't.
no, the const has no provision on interracial marriage or segregation in schools.
People who wait until the 2nd Trimester should be forced to have the child if they are healthy, unraped, and not a victim of incest.their position is that once the egg is fertilized abortion should be illegal and people should be forced to have a child they don't want.
In fact, the constitution DOESN'T EVEN SAY THE SUP CT CAN DECLARE LAWS UNCONST.
en.wikipedia.org
The right to a condom is rooted in the right to privacy. Do you think the furious five will revisit that?
You obviously have no clue what the word "mandate" means, then.you still could choose not to have one. no one is obligated to employ you. ain't capitalism great!
You might wish to hear what the former governor of Virginia or the current Mayor of New York had to say on that and alter your views accordingly.Sure, and if their position was just about third trimester I could get on sorta the same page.
People who wait until the 2nd Trimester should be forced to have the child if they are healthy, unraped, and not a victim of incest.
Because what you say isn't genuine, nothing thought freely, nothing said freely.Why do you quote me if you have no interest in actually addressing what I said?
What is to believe? The video of a police officer allowing protesters into the Capitol is as plain as the nose on your face!Oh, I'm sure you saw some video of some kid playing the piano and bleeved what you were told.
Just like abortion. Unenumerated, constitutionally protected rights.Thus, rights that were already covered by the Constitution.
A baby can't survive outside the womb on it's own either.
There is no such video, fool.What is to believe? The video of a police officer allowing protesters into the Capitol is as plain as the nose on your face!
www.factcheck.org
Nowhere in the Constitution does is say "separation between church and state", Dipshit.
And you are the only one talking religion. We are talking science, Science Denier.
Johnny Cash's song "A Boy Named Sue" is a totally different issue. The fictitious boy in the song did not want to be called Sue. he was picked on. He fought back. There is no comparison to any boy who desires to be called a girl's name.Neither did Johnny Cash.
You really are a moron. A baby is not a fetus.
Wait, What? You quoted the Constitution and it destroyed your premise.Yes it does dipshit. The Constitution says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". When you are using theology to make law then you are establishing a official religion. Thomas Jefferson was a major contributor and he wrote a letter stating the First Amendment established a wall between church and state.
Just like abortion. Unenumerated, constitutionally protected rights.
Talking about the leftwing leadership. The drivers of the ideology. Not what the deluded masses have been told.Because people have strong opinions on bodily autonomy.
