deskeptify
Member
- Aug 23, 2017
- 82
- 4
- 6
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!
It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.
Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.
You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.
No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.
And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.
Biological Aspects of Race
Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
The thread is the entire collection of posts. And in Post #7 you claimed that birds of different species don't flock together. I corrected you. For some reason you just cannot grasp the facts here. YOU first brought up birds, claiming they didn't flock with other species.
If you want to claim to be the "superior race", you might want to work on the fact that words have actual meanings. And you damn sure didn't mean it as a politically correct statement. Otherwise, you would not have used birds and fish as examples.
You see junior, if you are going to come here and spout shit, you need to be sharp enough to get your facts right. Otherwise it will be all humiliation.
Is that the best you can do? Bring up stuff that has already been settled? I didn't bring them up in my thread. FACT. I already told you that I guess I did bring them up in post #7. FACT. What more do you need to know. Also, whatever you want to call it, I started a thread called "The BS I heard on TV the other day." It was followed by a page that I wrote. To me, THAT is the thread. You yourself said "post #7." You didn't say "Thread #7." In that first page, I didn't mention birds. Deal with it.
Next, I added a couple pictures that went into "supremacy" a very tiny bit in post #62. Did you miss them? They weren't being said by White people. Also, bringing up birds and fish had nothing to do with "supremacy." In fact, what it was all about is how many creatures stick to their own species without any feelings of supremacy.
But it even goes beyond being the same species. There are zillions of creatures that will avoid their own kind and stick to their own extended family group. Two examples are lemurs and meerkats. How "racist" are they. Lastly, if anybody around here is being humiliated, it is you.
I simply answered your posts. YOu were the one who kept saying you didn't post anything about birds. The fact that the OP didn't mention birds is meaningless. Now it is settled. You brought up birds and were incorrect in your statement where they were concerned.
And races are not different species. If you want to claim it is some politically correct jargon, that can be your little secret. Most people prefer the actual meaning of words. And no, I did not say it was in "thread #7". Because as long as I have been on various boards (dating back to early dialup) the "thread" is the collection of posts. This is still the same thread that you posted the OP for and that you posted about birds in. The terminology does not vary because you cannot grasp it.
I didn't bring up birds in the "OP." Deal with it. But seeing how I did later on, do you think that what I said was wrong? I have SEEN it with my own eyes! Many times and with many species of bird. So don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining.
Next, I explained the whole "species" thing to you. Have you ever seen any nature show or gone to any biology class there they called any creature a "race" of anything? If you have, you experienced politically correct BS. You may not like it, but humans are creatures too. So the "race" thing just doesn't hold water.
Also, Homo neanderthalensis is generally considered to have been a different species of human. But more modern humans were apparently able to successfully interbreed with it. I could tell you more. But the truth isn't allowed around here.