The BS I Heard On TV The Other Day.

And human caused global warming isn't real either, right?

Is it? How much? How do you know?

No doubt there have been people around here who told you. They may have even shown you graphs to prove it. But you are too stupid or get paid too well to believe it. Ever see the documentary "Greedy Lying Bastards?" You should see if there are any plans to make a "Greedy Lying Bastards 2." If they are, you should see if you can be in it.

No doubt there have been people around here who told you.


I want you to tell me.
Over what time frame?
How much has the Earth warmed?
How much of that warming is our fault?
How do you know?

Ever see the documentary "Greedy Lying Bastards?"


No.

You should see if there are any plans to make a "Greedy Lying Bastards 2." If they are, you should see if you can be in it.

Asking you questions means I should be in a documentary? Cool.

If you run away instead of answering, you could be in a film called, "Deskeptify is a *****"
If you can't see the obvious, there's no point in explaining it to you.
Which, of course, means I can't explain it.
Desk, I was being sarcastic.

The fact is that proving something as huge as Climate Change and then understanding the proof requirements a massive amount of study.
I am fully in favor of limiting pollution as opposed to screaming Climate Change and then taxing Americans to pay for global studies.

I didn't say anything about climate change in my thread. I think it is best if people stick to what I did say in it.
You're right.
Many people believe that Muslims are only coming after us because we're in their countries.
When we weren't in their countries they had no problem sweeping across Europe.
For the first time in history we're not really dependent on the Arabs for oil and if we kicked all the old paid off politicians out of office, we would be able to get a new crop in that would state of the art methods to crush the terrorists.
 
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!
Look Ma!

We got us another board racist
 
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!
Look Ma!

We got us another board racist
"Racist" lost its effect years ago. Catch up with your people. The new scarlet letter is "fascist"... Get with the times man.
 
White supremacists say the same thing. As a matter of fact, ALL terrorist groups say the same thing. We really need the "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001" reinstated.
Agreed on white supremacists, disagreed on the Patriot Act. The Act shredded the Constitution by empowering the Federal government and weakening individual rights.

Individual rights for whom, the bad guys?

For every citizen of this nation.

I'm a United States citizen. I never lost any rights.
You gave up the right to privacy. Having your phones monitored, the books you check out from the library, etc.

Most of us have nothing to worry about but such information can be misused. What if a President or administration decides to use such info against those perceived as political enemies? It's not wise to empower a virtually all-powerful government with even more power. Weakening individual rights is all we have left.

President Ford reiterated a good quote before Congress in 1974:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

Unless you live under a rock, you don't have privacy.

If you own any technology, you don't have privacy.

The government is far less intrusive than corporate America unless you're a bad guy.
 
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!
Look Ma!

We got us another board racist
"Racist" lost its effect years ago. Catch up with your people. The new scarlet letter is "fascist"... Get with the times man.

Trump supporter is the new racist.
 
We did it to ourselves. We've become a nation of spineless, fearful weaklings, mere shadows of our Founding Fathers who fought against an empire.

You are wrong. It was done TO us. That is one of the problems of loving lies. There are many who are willing to tell you lies. To your detriment. There are also many who are willing to be led and be slaves. And there will be many who will be willing to do that to you. Again, obviously, to your detriment. And no forum would allow anybody to tell you the real truth.
Bullshit, but believe as you wish. I was around for both before and after 9/11. People are cowards and screamed for Congress to do something and they did; the Patriot Act.

If "We, the People" hadn't asked for it, we wouldn't have gotten it. We truly do get the government we deserve.

First, people aren't cowards. They're sheep. Mostly because they want to be. But another large part of the reason is that no forum that I am aware of, including this one, will allow anything to be said against the shepherds. Even though it is undeniable FACT! Next, nobody, absolutely nobody wanted the Patriot Act. That is just what they were told was necessary and accepted it.

Another "master stroke" was not going to war with the country where the enemies were. Pakistan. But instead going to war with the country where they weren't. Iraq.
Nuke Till They Puke

The Saudi monarchy is the headquarters of terrorism; Pakistan is one of its dependencies. Since Saudi unofficial agents caused 9\11, Mecca and Medina should pay the same price Japan did for Pearl Harbor.

Anyone who shelters or funds terrorists should be treated as terrorists.

Including domestic terrorists.
 
In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?
You gave up the right to privacy. Having your phones monitored, the books you check out from the library, etc.

Most of us have nothing to worry about but such information can be misused. What if a President or administration decides to use such info against those perceived as political enemies? It's not wise to empower a virtually all-powerful government with even more power. Weakening individual rights is all we have left.

President Ford reiterated a good quote before Congress in 1974:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

The things you mention are another example of how the terrorists won. But winning the occasional battle doesn't mean they won the war.
Agreed. Most Americans learned that lesson a few years after the Patriot Act passed, but it seems every new generation needs to relearn that giving away freedoms to an all powerful government isn't wise.

But to the terrorists, another victory. Which is yet another reason why we should deport them all. "Good" or bad. We also need to deport their supporters.
GXsStj0.jpg
Deport all of whom? Immigrants and those who immigrant heritage? Good luck!

Every journey begins with a single step. All you have to do is take a step. If you do so, maybe others will follow your example.
Like deporting all the ******* Nazis and other facists? I'm good with that.
 
Agreed on white supremacists, disagreed on the Patriot Act. The Act shredded the Constitution by empowering the Federal government and weakening individual rights.

Individual rights for whom, the bad guys?

For every citizen of this nation.

I'm a United States citizen. I never lost any rights.
You gave up the right to privacy. Having your phones monitored, the books you check out from the library, etc.

Most of us have nothing to worry about but such information can be misused. What if a President or administration decides to use such info against those perceived as political enemies? It's not wise to empower a virtually all-powerful government with even more power. Weakening individual rights is all we have left.

President Ford reiterated a good quote before Congress in 1974:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

Unless you live under a rock, you don't have privacy.

If you own any technology, you don't have privacy.

The government is far less intrusive than corporate America unless you're a bad guy.
You're free to give up all your rights for the sake of feeling "safe".
 
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!

White supremacists say the same thing. As a matter of fact, ALL terrorist groups say the same thing. We really need the "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001" reinstated.

White "supremacists?" Nice to see you parroting jew scum propaganda. I myself am a White "separatist." White people just happen to be superior. So if you are going to use a label, use a truthful one. Also, do you know who doesn't like separatism? Parasites. Like the fleas on a dog don't want to be separate from the dog.

Do you know what the fleas would be in favor of? "Uniting and strengthening by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct flea powder."

Also, somebody brought up birds. In nature, every flock of birds that I ever saw were all the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I ever saw were the same species of fish. That is natures way. Do you know how else terrorists win? By getting their enemies to expend valuable resources in fighting against nature. Instead of keeping track of terrorists, just think how much better it would be if authorities used those resources to keep track of criminals instead.

Also, do you know who says the same thing you do? Brainwashed anti-White traitorous scum. A coincidence? But getting back to your "supremacist" thing, I have a couple pictures for you.
kiwA9fQ.jpg
h5KdcHg.jpg

Ok, for the last time. YOU brought up birds. And your statement was incorrect the first time. This time you qualified it with "...I ever saw...". I'd still be willing to bet you are incorrect.

Redwing blackbirds and grackles flock together. In fact, the males of both species migrate in one flock, and the females of both species migrate in another flock. So, if you have seen blackbirds flying south in the fall or north in the spring, you have seen different species flocking together. You just do not know what you are seeing.

And I posted a link to some experts in birds at Stanford. You might read that. They say it is not uncommon for different species to flock together.

Did you, at least, figure out that you posted the first comment about birds? The rest of the conversation about birds has been refuting your claim about them or explaining that you did, indeed, post a comment about birds.
For several years, the redwing blackbirds were flocking with the robins when they returned in the spring.
 
Individual rights for whom, the bad guys?

For every citizen of this nation.

I'm a United States citizen. I never lost any rights.
You gave up the right to privacy. Having your phones monitored, the books you check out from the library, etc.

Most of us have nothing to worry about but such information can be misused. What if a President or administration decides to use such info against those perceived as political enemies? It's not wise to empower a virtually all-powerful government with even more power. Weakening individual rights is all we have left.

President Ford reiterated a good quote before Congress in 1974:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

Unless you live under a rock, you don't have privacy.

If you own any technology, you don't have privacy.

The government is far less intrusive than corporate America unless you're a bad guy.
You're free to give up all your rights for the sake of feeling "safe".

Exactly! A free society will never be safe. What you get when you give up your rights is the illusion of safety or the lack of freedom.
 
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!
Why are you making this about race and not culture?

Why are you posting a political or race thread in the military section?

As for the terrorists, **** them. Neutralize all of them and those who support them.

Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?





Does your shrink know you are on the computer?
 
In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?
You gave up the right to privacy. Having your phones monitored, the books you check out from the library, etc.

Most of us have nothing to worry about but such information can be misused. What if a President or administration decides to use such info against those perceived as political enemies? It's not wise to empower a virtually all-powerful government with even more power. Weakening individual rights is all we have left.

President Ford reiterated a good quote before Congress in 1974:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

The things you mention are another example of how the terrorists won. But winning the occasional battle doesn't mean they won the war.
Agreed. Most Americans learned that lesson a few years after the Patriot Act passed, but it seems every new generation needs to relearn that giving away freedoms to an all powerful government isn't wise.

But to the terrorists, another victory. Which is yet another reason why we should deport them all. "Good" or bad. We also need to deport their supporters.
GXsStj0.jpg
Deport all of whom? Immigrants and those who immigrant heritage? Good luck!

Every journey begins with a single step. All you have to do is take a step. ...


Take one, off a single short pier.
 
I started a few threads around here. At none of them did I even mention birds. You must be confusing me with someone else.

In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?

I just forgot. But I know that in the thread itself I didn't.
 
In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?

I just forgot. But I know that in the thread itself I didn't.

Most rational people, when confronted with something they forgot they posted, would look back over their posts to make sure. Instead, you argue and launch verbal attacks denying posting it. lol Superior, my ass.

And again, there are individual posts. The thread is all of the individual posts. This is the 94th post in this one thread. Your original post is referred to as the OP (Original Post-clever, huh?). The fact that you did not mention birds in the OP, is meaningless.
 
I started a few threads around here. At none of them did I even mention birds. You must be confusing me with someone else.

In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.

The thread is the entire collection of posts. And in Post #7 you claimed that birds of different species don't flock together. I corrected you. For some reason you just cannot grasp the facts here. YOU first brought up birds, claiming they didn't flock with other species.


If you want to claim to be the "superior race", you might want to work on the fact that words have actual meanings. And you damn sure didn't mean it as a politically correct statement. Otherwise, you would not have used birds and fish as examples.

You see junior, if you are going to come here and spout shit, you need to be sharp enough to get your facts right. Otherwise it will be all humiliation.

Is that the best you can do? Bring up stuff that has already been settled? I didn't bring them up in my thread. FACT. I already told you that I guess I did bring them up in post #7. FACT. What more do you need to know. Also, whatever you want to call it, I started a thread called "The BS I heard on TV the other day." It was followed by a page that I wrote. To me, THAT is the thread. You yourself said "post #7." You didn't say "Thread #7." In that first page, I didn't mention birds. Deal with it.

Next, I added a couple pictures that went into "supremacy" a very tiny bit in post #62. Did you miss them? They weren't being said by White people. Also, bringing up birds and fish had nothing to do with "supremacy." In fact, what it was all about is how many creatures stick to their own species without any feelings of supremacy.

But it even goes beyond being the same species. There are zillions of creatures that will avoid their own kind and stick to their own extended family group. Two examples are lemurs and meerkats. How "racist" are they. Lastly, if anybody around here is being humiliated, it is you.
 
No doubt there have been people around here who told you. They may have even shown you graphs to prove it. But you are too stupid or get paid too well to believe it. Ever see the documentary "Greedy Lying Bastards?" You should see if there are any plans to make a "Greedy Lying Bastards 2." If they are, you should see if you can be in it.

No doubt there have been people around here who told you.


I want you to tell me.
Over what time frame?
How much has the Earth warmed?
How much of that warming is our fault?
How do you know?

Ever see the documentary "Greedy Lying Bastards?"


No.

You should see if there are any plans to make a "Greedy Lying Bastards 2." If they are, you should see if you can be in it.

Asking you questions means I should be in a documentary? Cool.

If you run away instead of answering, you could be in a film called, "Deskeptify is a *****"
If you can't see the obvious, there's no point in explaining it to you.
Which, of course, means I can't explain it.
Desk, I was being sarcastic.

The fact is that proving something as huge as Climate Change and then understanding the proof requirements a massive amount of study.
I am fully in favor of limiting pollution as opposed to screaming Climate Change and then taxing Americans to pay for global studies.

I didn't say anything about climate change in my thread. I think it is best if people stick to what I did say in it.
You're right.
Many people believe that Muslims are only coming after us because we're in their countries.
When we weren't in their countries they had no problem sweeping across Europe.
For the first time in history we're not really dependent on the Arabs for oil and if we kicked all the old paid off politicians out of office, we would be able to get a new crop in that would state of the art methods to crush the terrorists.

To crush terrorists, you HAVE to be "politically incorrect." The White patriots in Charlottseville had their right to free speech crushed by "politically correct" terrorists. Any real fight against terrorism should start with them.
 
15th post
There was a show on the other day about terrorism. I didn't bother watching it. Because as a White American, I'm not a fan of BS and misdirection. But unfortunately, I did happen to catch about the last 30 seconds of it. They had some worthless sand negro on there saying that if we do something to muslims in general because of muslim terrorists, then the terrorists win.

Some choice. If we do nothing about them, they win. And if we do something positive about them, they supposedly win again. BULLSHIT!!!!!!! Any White person would have their "minds" swimming in a state of traitorous delusion to think that we need them around at all. I say we get rid of them all! "Good" or bad. That way, they won't be around to bother us. What would that mean? WE WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! WIN!!!!
Look Ma!

We got us another board racist

You say that like it's a bad thing. If you weren't at utterly clueless as you seem to be, you would see that your approach isn't working. And if you had the ability to look a move or two into the future, you would see that your approach is only going to make things worse.
 
Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?
The things you mention are another example of how the terrorists won. But winning the occasional battle doesn't mean they won the war.
Agreed. Most Americans learned that lesson a few years after the Patriot Act passed, but it seems every new generation needs to relearn that giving away freedoms to an all powerful government isn't wise.

But to the terrorists, another victory. Which is yet another reason why we should deport them all. "Good" or bad. We also need to deport their supporters.
GXsStj0.jpg
Deport all of whom? Immigrants and those who immigrant heritage? Good luck!

Every journey begins with a single step. All you have to do is take a step. If you do so, maybe others will follow your example.
Like deporting all the ******* Nazis and other facists? I'm good with that.

The only reason you say that is because the truth isn't allowed around here.
 
In post #7 of this thread you stated:
"Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish."


Does any of that look familiar?

Well I guess it did come up. But you have to admit that I didn't bring up birds in my thread. With that being the case, every flock of birds that I ever saw ere the same species of bird. And every school of fish that I have ever seen were all the same species of fish. That is every freakin one!

It isn't impossible for different flocks of birds to fly together. But I would bet that it is more likely than not that for the rare cases that it does happen, they aren't evenly intermingled. But still tend to group with their own kind.

Next, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." No place else in nature is any creature referred to as a "race" of anything. Though one time long ago on some nature show, I did hear somebody refer to some creature as a race of something. But being so long ago, I don't remember if he was even being serious or not. Though in ALL other cases, every creature ever mentioned was labeled as a species. Maybe sometimes as a sub-species. But never a sub-race.

You also bring up dogs. Though creatures domesticated by humans don't count. Though I will say that in the U.S., western wolves and eastern wolves, which are considered to be different species of wolf, can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Eastern wolves and coyotes can interbreed and have viable offspring. But that doesn't make them the same species. Western wolves and coyotes can't interbreed and have viable offspring.


No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.

The thread is the entire collection of posts. And in Post #7 you claimed that birds of different species don't flock together. I corrected you. For some reason you just cannot grasp the facts here. YOU first brought up birds, claiming they didn't flock with other species.


If you want to claim to be the "superior race", you might want to work on the fact that words have actual meanings. And you damn sure didn't mean it as a politically correct statement. Otherwise, you would not have used birds and fish as examples.

You see junior, if you are going to come here and spout shit, you need to be sharp enough to get your facts right. Otherwise it will be all humiliation.

Is that the best you can do? Bring up stuff that has already been settled? I didn't bring them up in my thread. FACT. I already told you that I guess I did bring them up in post #7. FACT. What more do you need to know. Also, whatever you want to call it, I started a thread called "The BS I heard on TV the other day." It was followed by a page that I wrote. To me, THAT is the thread. You yourself said "post #7." You didn't say "Thread #7." In that first page, I didn't mention birds. Deal with it.

Next, I added a couple pictures that went into "supremacy" a very tiny bit in post #62. Did you miss them? They weren't being said by White people. Also, bringing up birds and fish had nothing to do with "supremacy." In fact, what it was all about is how many creatures stick to their own species without any feelings of supremacy.

But it even goes beyond being the same species. There are zillions of creatures that will avoid their own kind and stick to their own extended family group. Two examples are lemurs and meerkats. How "racist" are they. Lastly, if anybody around here is being humiliated, it is you.

I simply answered your posts. YOu were the one who kept saying you didn't post anything about birds. The fact that the OP didn't mention birds is meaningless. Now it is settled. You brought up birds and were incorrect in your statement where they were concerned.

And races are not different species. If you want to claim it is some politically correct jargon, that can be your little secret. Most people prefer the actual meaning of words. And no, I did not say it was in "thread #7". Because as long as I have been on various boards (dating back to early dialup) the "thread" is the collection of posts. This is still the same thread that you posted the OP for and that you posted about birds in. The terminology does not vary because you cannot grasp it.
 
No, I will admit no such thing. Post #7 was the first time birds were mentioned. And it was in a post YOU made.

And the word "species" denotes a specific scientific classification. The different races are not different species.

Biological Aspects of Race

Well look at my thread. Forget the posts. You will not see birds mentioned in my thread. Next, "race" IS just a politically correct way of saying "species." Deal with it.
WTF? Are you lying to yourself? You mentioned birds here:
Why race? Because race (species) is the very rock bottom foundation of all problems. It is why all flocks of birds are the same species of bird. And why all schools of fish are the same species of fish.

This all revolves around death. Have you ever heard of the military being involved in death?
Agreed. Most Americans learned that lesson a few years after the Patriot Act passed, but it seems every new generation needs to relearn that giving away freedoms to an all powerful government isn't wise.

But to the terrorists, another victory. Which is yet another reason why we should deport them all. "Good" or bad. We also need to deport their supporters.
GXsStj0.jpg
Deport all of whom? Immigrants and those who immigrant heritage? Good luck!

Every journey begins with a single step. All you have to do is take a step. If you do so, maybe others will follow your example.
Like deporting all the ******* Nazis and other facists? I'm good with that.

The only reason you say that is because the truth isn't allowed around here.

The truth is allowed to be spoken here. That you think your racial separatist nonsense is some great truth is laughable. But you are allowed to talk about it, within the bounds of the regular rules. There are plenty of threads blaming other races and Jews for the problems some idiot white guys have.
 
Back
Top Bottom