RE: Israel's War Against Hamas - Updates
SUBTOPIC:
※→ et al,
(OPENING)
International confidence in the judiciary by improper conduct has made the appearance of impropriety by providing direct support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS).
The members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have unequivocally sided with the Islamic Resistance and its associates who all have been designated by Common Position Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/152 which has designated the Islamic Resistance and its associates as "terrorist entities."
(COMMENT)
The members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have unequivocally sided with the Islamic Resistance and its associates who all have been designated by Common Position Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/152 which has designated the Islamic Resistance and its associates as "terrorist entities."
◈ The members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have effectively given tacit approval for the Islamic Resistance and its associates to violate International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
✦ Conduct military operations within or near densely populated areas.
✦ Prevent or obstruct the removal of civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of military objectives.
✦ Grant judicial support for the tacit approval to the Islamic Resistance to take hostages during Resistance Operations.
✦ Grant judicial support for the tacit approval to the Islamic Resistance to the use of human shields for innocent civilians and captured hostages to render certain points, areas, or terrorist forces immune from military operations.”
Assets of every kind (whether tangible or intangible) however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form, including electronic or digital, evidencing title to, or interest in, such assets, including, but not limited to, bank credits, cheques, money orders, shares, securities, bonds, drafts, letters of credit.
Rule 154. Obedience to Superior Orders
Concerning the position of an Israeli combatant who disobeys or ignores the ICJ (unlawful orders).
When the members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issue such orders and provisional measures that allow the Islamic Resistance to burrow deeper into the innocent general population thereby preventing traditional and customary from effectively seeking out and destroying hostile terrorist operators that participated in the invasion of Israel, the members of the court and judicial body have abandon an impartial or unbiased and have adopted selective enforcement of international laws.
Most Respectfully,
R
,