Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
How does that work? Dismissing racists is racism? No. Dismissing someone because of their race is racism.Did he get to explain what made him think she had no pool pass?
If the assumption is racism and the firing based on that assumption then that’s racism itself.
But he may not have called the cops just because the woman was black. He and another said they didn't recognize her.How does that work? Dismissing racists is racism? No. Dismissing someone because of their race is racism.Did he get to explain what made him think she had no pool pass?
If the assumption is racism and the firing based on that assumption then that’s racism itself.
You are lying piece of shit.He works at the pool.Why does calling the cops on a woman in a pool have anything to do with his employment?
I meant "worked".
No he didn’t. He was just another resident and decided to enforce the rules, as he saw them. On people who didn’t belong in his neighborhood. If they had sneaked into the neighborhood then they should have the good grace not to go out in public.
Glad he got fired. I assumed it would be Monday, but nope.
Howso?I bet she did. It would have been humiliating and degrading.How was it racist or discrimination to call the police? Did the police kick her out? If not, who cares?
You are lying piece of shit.He works at the pool.Why does calling the cops on a woman in a pool have anything to do with his employment?
I meant "worked".
No he didn’t. He was just another resident and decided to enforce the rules, as he saw them. On people who didn’t belong in his neighborhood. If they had sneaked into the neighborhood then they should have the good grace not to go out in public.
Glad he got fired. I assumed it would be Monday, but nope.
She had the pass, and he interfered with her right to be there.Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
Dude. Put down the argument and slowly back away from it. It's already blown up in your face once.If he's fired for assumed racism then that is based on skin color and that's a racist defense. Making It a racial issue when it may not have been is a racist presumption. They'd be guilty of what they're blaming him for.
If his agreement says he has the right to demand ID then he has a perfect defence. I haven't seen that defence made.But if this guy PAYS rent (which is probably atrocious), then he has a right to question who is taking up space in a coveted summer activity.
She had the pass, and he interfered with her right to be there.Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
did the jerk who called the police come up with a justification?
The company could have merely been protecting it's business reputation. If one of your employees ends up in the media facing allegations of racism I'd think most companies might be concerned about how that would reflect upon them having hired someone who might actually be a racist.Did he get to explain what made him think she had no pool pass?
If the assumption is racism and the firing based on that assumption then that’s racism itself.
Maybe he shouldn't have been acting like it WAS his job to regulate who had access to the swimming pool by calling the police on her. He probably would still have his job if he hadn't been trying to exert an authority he didn't have.But if this guy PAYS rent (which is probably atrocious), then he has a right to question who is taking up space in a coveted summer activity. Should he have been fired? FUCK NO. I am so sick of people being fired over shit they do when NOT at work. Again, depending on what they did to begin with.
Maybe he shouldn't have been acting like it WAS his job to regulate who had access to the swimming pool by calling the police on her. He probably would still have his job if he hadn't been trying to exert an authority he didn't have.
He had no cause to remove her.She had the pass, and he interfered with her right to be there.Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
You still didn’t answer the question.
He didn’t interfere if all he did was call the police. Once they arrived and determined what was going on, they either removed her or they didn’t. If they removed her then it’s on the police. If they never did then she was never denied her “right” to be there.
He had no cause to remove her.She had the pass, and he interfered with her right to be there.Was she prevented from going in?She had a pass, she had a right to be there.
You still didn’t answer the question.
He didn’t interfere if all he did was call the police. Once they arrived and determined what was going on, they either removed her or they didn’t. If they removed her then it’s on the police. If they never did then she was never denied her “right” to be there.
He had no cause to call the police.