It means blocking their attempts to push religion.No one is ‘pushing atheism’ whatever that’s supposed to mean.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It means blocking their attempts to push religion.No one is ‘pushing atheism’ whatever that’s supposed to mean.
Actually it is.
It can be found here in the Constitution:
“The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach."
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
I would point all people trying to play ignorant to the entire state of Utah I guess.I have no idea what a Christian based community is. Where are these and how do they operate?
Ah...Someone needs a pat on the head!I would point all people trying to play ignorant to the entire state of Utah I guess.
How dangerous and disgusting is all white all Christian Utah?
dblack
Notice I used the word 'inadvertent'. The framers didn't intend for the government to promote atheism, but that's exactly what is happening by default when you disallow Christian laws. Abortion and gay marriage are the examples here,.No. Not one embraced atheism in government, not a single one. But they did back the concept that the federal government would have no say in whether a person was a Christian, Jew, Atheist or whatever. There is NOTHING in the Constitution supporting separation of Church and State other than no religious test will be used to establish qualifications for federal office or appointment, i.e. no religious power will have any more say in what the government will be than any other citizens, and the federal government will not dictate any religious label or belief or interfere with anybody's exercise of their religion. There was no rule or implication that Congress itself could not be as religious as it chose to be or exercise its religion however or that the religious could not petition their government for what they hoped would be law just as other citizens can do.
Extrapolate the data for us Lib…would 49 other Utahs be bad for the republic?Someone needs a pat on the head!
Where does yours come from?We were talking about your need for negative attention. Where does it come from?
Yeah, but the problem is it inadvertently endorsed atheism by default, and thus is the reason for my series of threads calling for an amendment to get America declared a Christian nation. It will no doubt take major wars, Depressions, and other calamities to get us in the frame of mind to do that. Unfortunately, human nature requires a strong nudge to get us going in the right direction.In the case of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, limit the power of government to promote, favor, or entangle itself with religion – such as prohibiting government from placing the 10 commandments on public/government property.
You miss the whole point. By failing to declare America a Christian nation, it left atheism as the default.The founders had it right to create the separation of powers between the church and state. Some historians claim that was to protect the church from the state, while other historians state the opposite, that it was to protect the state from the church. Either way, it was a good safety feature in protecting human rights from either the abuses of the government or from religious leaders in power. Power has a way of decaying social morals and humans are imperfect creatures to say the least.
Hahaha…poor Tard….the entire Declaration Of Independence is filled with Christian ideology…if America was founded on any other religion it would be the same disgusting filthy shithole that all others are…hahaha…why can’t you see the obvious?Where's the word "christianity" in our most powerful founding document? If christianity was the "centerpiece", surely it's there, right?
It's not just christianity. It's any religion.
If you want to see how nice a country run by religion is, just look at those Muslim countries which hurl homosexuals off of buildings. Zealots like you and Mashmouth would do the exact same thing...
Government endorsing gay marriage and abortion is indeed pushing godlessness, aka atheism.No one is ‘pushing atheism’ whatever that’s supposed to mean.
Following the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate, following First Amendment jurisprudence prohibiting government entanglement, promotion, or establishment of religion, is not to ‘push atheism.’
Indeed, the doctrine of separation of church and state and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment safeguard religious liberty and expression.
Yeah, leftists and atheists certainly don't agree with my proposal. Why would they want to surrender control?But he is certainly in the minority, even on this site.
The Supreme Court says it is. Atheists certainly don't want it considered a religion. Then they can't scoop up all the power given to them by default.Atheism isn’t a ‘religion.’
I'll ask again: What's the 'secular' position on abortion. So far, no one has answered.And no one takes issue with theists participating in government, provided they understand that government is secular and not to be used to compel adherence to religious dogma:
“The Constitution mandates that the government remain secular, rather than affiliating itself with religious beliefs or institutions, precisely in order to avoid discriminating against citizens on the basis of their religious faiths. Thus, the claim that prohibiting government from celebrating Christmas as a religious holiday discriminates against Christians in favor of nonadherents must fail, since it contradicts the fundamental premise of the Establishment Clause itself.”
Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)
County of Allegheny v. ACLU: The Establishment Clause prohibits placing religious symbols on public property if it results in promoting religion.supreme.justia.com
Why would you…good people doing good things never seem “threatening” to filth…EVER.I can't think of any time I've felt threatened by them.
You?
OK, so what IS the secular position on abortion? Tell us.There is no ‘secular position’ on abortion – that’s nonsense.
There are atheists who oppose abortion and support its being ‘banned.’
There are Christians who support a woman’s right to privacy and oppose abortion being ‘banned.’
Government requires taxpayer dollars to fund abortions. Government requires certain professions to participate in gay marriages. Also, American citizens are required to deal with the fall out of societal problems resulting from abortion and gay sex.Wrong.
Recognizing a woman’s right to privacy and the equal protection rights of gay Americans to marry doesn’t violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
Government is not compelling Christians to have abortions or Catholics to allow same-sex couples to marry in the Catholic Church.
Government is not interfering with Christians to practice their beliefs; Christians are at liberty to oppose abortion and to not accommodate same-sex marriage in their churches.
As I said, that's where we're headed. Not fully there yet.As long as people of faith are elected to office, it is not an atheist nation.
You have often said that atheists should move to one of the 5 big atheist nations to see what it was like. Those atheists nations do not allow people to worship.
What a shame bakers, florists, and photographers aren't allowed to say "Don't want my services? Don't use them."It's theists who don't understand that if you're against same sex marriage... then don't marry someone from the same sex. Nowhere does it say that religious rights come before any other right. Freedom of religion gives you the right to practise any religion you want to practise, but it doesn't give you the right to impose your views on others.
Don't like abortion? Don't have one, but leave the rest of the people the fuck alone. Pretty simple concept really.