Supreme Court Oral Arguments in the Birthright Citizenship Case

So let me see if I have this right.

We (Trump included) have submitted that the precedent is wrong and never what the Authors of the 14th intended NOR should have intended. . . and your counterargument is to cite the very precedent that is being challenged?
We already know what the authors intended Chuz, and have known for the past 150 years since written, and confirmed with precedent cases early on and since then.

This was just pouring tax payer money down the drain from the get go...a frivolous attempt at rewriting our constitution.

Prior to the 14th ....under US law (English common law of jus soli)ALL PERSONS born on our soil were born citizens with the only exceptions being children of Slaves, and Native Americans with treaty governance....who were addressed separately shortly thereafter by Congress.

After the 14th, it became ALL PERSONS born on our soil including children born by slaves.

If you have time, spend some more time learning our history....it's interesting and enlightening!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom