In historic visit, Trump to attend Supreme Court arguments

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

We already do that. We have since 2020. But it's not working very well. There are 500 birth tourism companies in China alone. They exist entirely to get around the restriction.

US Imposes Visa Rules for Pregnant Women on ‘Birth Tourism’

The Trump administration is imposing new visa rules aimed at restricting “birth tourism,” in which women travel to the United States to give birth so their children can have U.S. citizenship.

news.wttw.com

Who was President from 2021 to 2025? They didn't enforce any other immigration laws, so what makes you think they did this? If we enforced it now, doesn't that eliminate the problem?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It seems to me that a citizen of any other foreign country who takes it upon themself to enter the U.S. in an illegal/ criminal way is still under the jurisdiction of their native government.

A Mexican citizen can be prosecuted in Mexico for crimes they commit in other countries. Can't they?

Just as a U.S. Citizen can be charged for crimes they might commit in another country.

Some people try awfully hard to intentionally complicate this shit.

You would have to extradite the person back to Mexico to be prosecuted. Unless you deport them you have no right to send them home if they are here legally. You really did not think that one through.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I think if you treat her differently than any other woman, you're a dick. This is exactly why a case like the one before the court needs to be decided then move on.

if she aint a citizen she can come back after she drops the kid...its nice to know unk that you are for letting people take advantage of our laws..

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The SCOTUS can't make any laws at all. And the 14A does contain an exception in the words, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof".


We shall see.


I'm not a lib.

You said exceptions in regard to pregnant women. You are really having a hard time keeping your arguments straight.

You take the side of libs often.

 

[Unkotare]

.....its nice to know unk that you are for letting people take advantage of our laws..

When did I say that?

 

[WEATHER53]

The USSC judges have fallen victim to the fake feeling frenzy overspreading USA as to some form of law and contract created by the Statue of Liberty inscriptions

 

[Harry Dresden]

When did I say that?

you didnt have to say it...

 

[The Duke]

What if she doesn't even know she's pregnant yet?

Is she a naturalized citizen?

 

[Eman623]

You said exceptions in regard to pregnant women. You are really having a hard time keeping your arguments straight.

What exactly did I say about "exceptions in regard to pregnant women"?

You take the side of libs often.

Maybe it's because I'm not a member of a cult.

 

[Eman623]

Who was President from 2021 to 2025? They didn't enforce any other immigration laws, so what makes you think they did this? If we enforced it now, doesn't that eliminate the problem?

It would until the next Dem president came into office and threw the doors wide open again.

If the SCOTUS ruled that kids born here by moms who were not LPRs were not automatically citizens, could a future Dem president simply sign an EO giving them citizenship? I think not. That would be a more permanent solution.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

What exactly did I say about "exceptions in regard to pregnant women"?


Maybe it's because I'm not a member of a cult.

You don't even know what a cult is. A cult is the Democratic Party that can't define a woman.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It would until the next Dem president came into office and threw the doors wide open again.

If the SCOTUS ruled that kids born here by moms who were not LPRs were not automatically citizens, could a future Dem president simply sign an EO giving them citizenship? I think not. That would be a more permanent solution.

They cannot and will not do that because that is not within the scope of this case. That would be creating law, and they do not have that ability.

Have a nice day and go read your Constitution.

 

[Stann]

WASHINGTON, April 1 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump was set to make a historic visit to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, attending arguments over the legality of a policy he considers crucial to his hardline approach toward immigration - a directive he signed on his first day back in office that would limit birthright citizenship.

The court said it is not aware of a president attending arguments in modern times, meaning since its current building opened in 1935.

MSN

Meh, his name is on the case so why not?

LOL....I guess it sucks when the Boss shows up.

Trump lied while he was there to try to support his position on birthright citizenship. He said " We're the only country in the world stupid enough to offer birthright citizenship. " Thirty other nations offer birthright citizenship. Including both of our neighbors , Canada and Mexico. trump.never learns , his lies just don't cut it anymore. Most of US are on to what a creep he is.

 

[Eman623]

They cannot and will not do that because that is not within the scope of this case. That would be creating law, and they do not have that ability.

You're the one who said the SCOTUS "can't make law that conflicts with the 14th Amendment that doesn't contain any exception." So presumably you think they can make law that doesn't conflict with the 14A.

The SCOTUS cannot make law. It can interpret the law, which is their wheelhouse.

Have a nice day and go read your Constitution.

I only read the official one. Not sure where you got the one that says the SCOTUS can make laws.

 

[Unkotare]

Is she a naturalized citizen?

I don't know.

 

[Unkotare]

you didnt have to say it...

Oh, you must be a leftist. Leftists are always mind readers.

 

[The Duke]

I don't know.

That matters.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Oh, you must be a leftist. Leftists are always mind readers.

hey look just because you get called a lib a lot around here,dont drag me down with your plight...

 

[Chuz Life]

You would have to extradite the person back to Mexico to be prosecuted. Unless you deport them you have no right to send them home if they are here legally. You really did not think that one through.

Are you using technicalities to dodge my point, intentionally?

A Mexican Citizen is subject to Mexican laws, even if they leave Mexico and try to hide their criminal activity in another country.

(Same way that U.S. Citizens are)

Aren't they?

Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of Mexican Law

Shared via Copilot

copilot.microsoft.com

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You're the one who said the SCOTUS "can't make law that conflicts with the 14th Amendment that doesn't contain any exception." So presumably you think they can make law that doesn't conflict with the 14A.

The SCOTUS cannot make law. It can interpret the law, which is their wheelhouse.


I only read the official one. Not sure where you got the one that says the SCOTUS can make laws.

You need reading comprehension lessons. I said they can't make law period which is what you want them to do. Is your disability terminal?