In historic visit, Trump to attend Supreme Court arguments

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
76,544
Reaction score
113,314
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
WASHINGTON, April 1 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump was set to make a historic visit to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, attending arguments over the legality of a policy he considers crucial to his hardline approach toward immigration - a directive he signed on his first day back in office that would limit birthright citizenship.

The court said it is not aware of a president attending arguments in modern times, meaning since its current building opened in 1935.


Meh, his name is on the case so why not?

LOL....I guess it sucks when the Boss shows up.
;)
 
Let’s see if Trump stays awake

1775055372837.webp
 
President Trump attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case. Multiple justices seemed skeptical of his efforts to bar children of undocumented immigrants or temporary residents from automatically being Americans.


The Supreme Court on Wednesday is hearing a case that could upend what generations of Americans have understood: that nearly all children born in the United States are automatically citizens.

President Trump, who attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case, has tried to strictly limit birthright citizenship. He signed an executive order he signed on his first day back in office, arguing that babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants and temporary foreign visitors were ineligible. A victory in the Supreme Court would have sweeping practical consequences, stripping citizenship from some 200,000 babies born each year.

The justices, including members of the court’s conservative supermajority — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Neil M. Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett — seemed troubled by aspects of the administration’s position. Chief Justice Roberts referred to a key part of the government’s argument as “quirky.”

The 14th. Amendment is very clear on this, the citizenship status of parents is NOT discussed.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The 14th. Amendment also guarantees the Right To Due Process. It is in the Constitution, live with it.
 
Last edited:
President Trump attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case. Multiple justices seemed skeptical of his efforts to bar children of undocumented immigrants or temporary residents from automatically being Americans.


The Supreme Court on Wednesday is hearing a case that could upend what generations of Americans have understood: that nearly all children born in the United States are automatically citizens.

President Trump, who attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case, has tried to strictly limit birthright citizenship. He signed an executive order he signed on his first day back in office, arguing that babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants and temporary foreign visitors were ineligible. A victory in the Supreme Court would have sweeping practical consequences, stripping citizenship from some 200,000 babies born each year.

The justices, including members of the court’s conservative supermajority — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Neil M. Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett — seemed troubled by aspects of the administration’s position. Chief Justice Roberts referred to a key part of the government’s argument as “quirky.”
This is a conservative Court dominated by partisan right wing ideologies who have already demonstrated their contempt for settled, accepted precedent.
 
President Trump attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case. Multiple justices seemed skeptical of his efforts to bar children of undocumented immigrants or temporary residents from automatically being Americans.


The Supreme Court on Wednesday is hearing a case that could upend what generations of Americans have understood: that nearly all children born in the United States are automatically citizens.

President Trump, who attended the arguments but left after the government presented its case, has tried to strictly limit birthright citizenship. He signed an executive order he signed on his first day back in office, arguing that babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants and temporary foreign visitors were ineligible. A victory in the Supreme Court would have sweeping practical consequences, stripping citizenship from some 200,000 babies born each year.

The justices, including members of the court’s conservative supermajority — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Neil M. Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett — seemed troubled by aspects of the administration’s position. Chief Justice Roberts referred to a key part of the government’s argument as “quirky.”

The 14th. Amendment is very clear on this, the citizenship status of parents is NOT discussed.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The 14th. Amendment also guarantees the Right To Due Process. It is in the Constitution, live with it.
As an "anchor baby" I speak with authority that the 14th will stand.
 
If a Chinese oligarch sends his pregnant mistress to the US on a tourist visa to have the baby, to say that this child is subject to the laws of the USA is a legal fiction.

I can see the justices overturning that part.

I'm less sanguine about ending birth citizenship for kids of people living here illegally.

But I would not even hazard a guess how the Supes will rule here.
 
Last edited:
i have no problems with it ...BUT....no non citizen pregnant woman should allowed in....come back after the birth....
 
i have no problems with it ...BUT....no non citizen pregnant woman should allowed in....come back after the birth....
Want to have pregnancy tests at every airport? Every woman who gets off an international flight goes to the "Pee on the stick" line? Put millions of sticks along the Mexican and Canadian borders, end to end?
 
Want to have pregnancy tests at every airport? Every woman who gets off an international flight goes to the "Pee on the stick" line? Put millions of sticks along the Mexican and Canadian borders, end to end?
some woman you can see are you aware of that?....the others? after they have their kids see how long she has been here...
 
Robert’s is a disgrace
“Quirky examples of” belongs Nowhere in a USSC judges evaluation of presented material. It’s a feeling
 
A
Dupe

and of course they do not
And of course they do not
 
15th post
//Amazing Stain OK with this stuff daily. Look at that face, the hate. Now it's the norm, not the outlier. Not once in a lifetime but daily. THX Obiden//


1775063888404.webp


Look at me! I'm so hip!!! Stain blow

Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) went on X and posted an absolutely unhinged tweet with several F-bombs.

“So f**king f**ked up. I’ll pray they f**k him to his face,” she wrote.

“Sorry, I say f*ck a lot these days.”


 
//Amazing Stain OK with this stuff daily. Look at that face, the hate. Now it's the norm, not the outlier. Not once in a lifetime but daily. THX Obiden//


View attachment 1238069

Look at me! I'm so hip!!! Stain blow

Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) went on X and posted an absolutely unhinged tweet with several F-bombs.

“So f**king f**ked up. I’ll pray they f**k him to his face,” she wrote.

“Sorry, I say f*ck a lot these days.”


Did it offend the snowflake in you?

Can I offer you a safe space?
 
Crazed liberals putting feelings ahead of thought and speaking like gutter trash boogies she did
 
Back
Top Bottom