Supreme Court Oral Arguments in the Birthright Citizenship Case

Bringing Families Together Back Where They Came From

Twisting words again. The only jurisdiction the anchor clankers are under is the jurisdiction of ICE to deport them. Only Americans have civil rights, so invaders and their droppings cannot be "innocent until proven guilty." It is up to them to immediately prove that they and their junior varsity belong here.

The ignorance in your post is so thick it gives me a tooth ache.
 
Let's all ignore how immigration took place before we ever thought of or started having the problem of illegal invasions to pursue birthright citizenship.

Immigration was primarily government-controlled/ physically. (remember Ellis Island?)

Not everyone was allowed in.


1775169596132.webp
 
If your neighbor's cow crosses from Canada, the ciw is now subject to US jurisdiction.
Uh-oh. Cows sometimes have rings in their noses. Illegal cows with nose rings will terrify brokeloser.
 
Let's all ignore how immigration took place before we ever thought of or started having the problem of illegal invasions to pursue birthright citizenship.

Immigration was primarily government-controlled/ physically. (remember Ellis Island?)

Not everyone was allowed in.


View attachment 1238581
Everyone forgets Angel Island.
 
Let's all ignore how immigration took place before we ever thought of or started having the problem of illegal invasions to pursue birthright citizenship.

Immigration was primarily government-controlled/ physically. (remember Ellis Island?)

Not everyone was allowed in.


View attachment 1238581

That's because they arrived by ship.

Here is the US/Canada border circa 1920.

WW

1775169976531.webp
 
If your neighbor's cow crosses from Canada, the ciw is now subject to US jurisdiction.

That's Canada, and all these illegals didn't come across the Canadian border.

Now if If a cow crosses the border from Mexico into the United States, ownership remains technically with the original Mexican owner, but the animal is considered an illegal import under U.S. law. Such animals are usually treated as strays or contraband, which can lead to quarantine, seizure, or destruction by U.S. authorities due to disease control protocols.

Illegal aliens are damned lucky we didn't treat them like cows, but then, there wouldn't be so damned many of them here.
 
" Locked In Tight With Self Affliction And Blaming The Messenger For Mockery *

* Cowardice With Ignorance And Incompetence In Ability To Disprove It *

Yeah.....you think we're too stupid to understand.
And when it comes to most No Kings folks....you're absolutely correct.
In retrospect , a more obvious cause would be cowardice and incompetence , where cowardice is intrinsic with an inability to challenge censure and sanction of precedence from institutions guided and gilded by linguistic incompetence , which engage in psychobabble about subject-to , while ignorantly failing to consider subject-of .

Perhaps someone will inquire as to why the term thereof is even included in the phrase ?

* Administrative Apathy For Tax Dollars *
But when you break into this country and hide from authorities you don't get to stay here.
That is partially true as illegitimate award of us citizenship does not prevent such citizens from being deported along with their primary caregivers , while those avoiding deportation get 18 years of social subsistence for their anchor baby .

. Chapter 4 - Automatic Acquisition of Citizenship after Birth (INA 320) .
An abandoned child found in the U.S. under age 5 with no known parents or birth record is legally presumed to be a U.S. citizen. For children with known backgrounds, citizenship is generally acquired automatically under age 18 through legal adoption and lawful permanent residency.
 
Let's all ignore how immigration took place before we ever thought of or started having the problem of illegal invasions to pursue birthright citizenship.

Immigration was primarily government-controlled/ physically. (remember Ellis Island?)

Not everyone was allowed in.


View attachment 1238581
Nothing to do with the Constitutional issues involved.
 
That's Canada, and all these illegals didn't come across the Canadian border.

Now if If a cow crosses the border from Mexico into the United States, ownership remains technically with the original Mexican owner, but the animal is considered an illegal import under U.S. law. Such animals are usually treated as strays or contraband, which can lead to quarantine, seizure, or destruction by U.S. authorities due to disease control protocols.

Illegal aliens are damned lucky we didn't treat them like cows, but then, there wouldn't be so damned many of them here.
Your brain works in very interesting ways.
 
Sure, mention is it once for "their situation of existence," but mention it 28 times?
Have you read the case where it was used and why, and have you read the summary decision, or do you know the situation in the U.S. with Chinese people at that time to know the context?

All persons, is why the decision was made that he was a citizen, regardless of his parents being Chinese and under the law of the time, were ineligible to become citizens.
 
15th post
Why are you lying? I just posted in post #140 that the guy who wrote it clearly meant that it did not include children of aliens.

Did you not see that post, or what? I have never known you to lack integrity.

And I'll be honest with you, until I read that, I was on your side of this issue.

What I read in black and white as to what this amendment means changed my mind.
I am not lying! You have totally misconstrued what Howard is saying! And I mean totally!

Howard agrees it is ALL PERSONS, not just slaves....he says so in what you posted.

Howard's amendment is for the aliens here who are foreign ambassadors and diplomats, who under their present law, are under the jurisdiction of their own foreign government whom they are representatives for, who have diplomatic immunity, when they or their family birth a child here, they are NOT born citizens. This was left out and needed to be added.
 
Last edited:
Have you read the case where it was used and why,
Yes
and have you read the summary decision,
I read the decision
or do you know the situation in the U.S. with Chinese people at that time to know the context?
Yes. they came here legally and were permanently domiciled here.
All persons, is why the decision was made that he was a citizen, regardless of his parents being Chinese and under the law of the time, were ineligible to become citizens.
Not sure what you are saying here.
 
Back
Top Bottom