Supreme Court reviewing birthright citizenship

[Unkotare]

Bottomline are ANCHOR BABIES....

There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

 

[Dragonlady]

Do you disagree?

You're a complete idiot and you demonstrate that daily.

E. Jean Carroll's lawyer said that when Trump got up and walked out of her final summation to the jury, she knew they'd won their case, because the jury was completely offended by his actions. I'm guessing the members of the SC were similarly insulted yesterday when Trump stormed out in the middle of their questioning of the Administration's lawyer for the case.

Trump is a petulant asshole who thinks he can intimidate people with his stupidity. And it backfires on him every single time.

 

[Lockback]

Then deny them entry. Problem solved.

On what grounds?

 

[Unkotare]

You're a complete idiot and you demonstrate that daily.

E. Jean Carroll's lawyer said that when Trump got up and walked out of her final summation to the jury, she knew they'd won their case, because the jury was completely offended by his actions. I'm guessing the members of the SC were similarly insulted yesterday when Trump stormed out in the middle of their questioning of the Administration's lawyer for the case.

Trump is a petulant asshole who thinks he can intimidate people with his stupidity. And it backfires on him every single time.

You didn’t answer my question.

 

[Lockback]

It has been like this since 1868 and we're still here. Seems like a lot of people just started to panic yesterday. There are already over 5 million Chinese Americans and we haven't "lost" this country.

We're in the process as we speak.
Don't be naive.
The Communist Chinese play the long game. And they figured this out years ago.

 

[Unkotare]

We're in the process as we speak.
Don't be naive.
The Communist Chinese play the long game. And they figured this out years ago.

Since 1868? That’s a pretty long game.

 

[Lockback]

Since 1868? That’s a pretty long game.

Obviously, I don't mean that.
I mean, they're taking advantage of a loophole that's existed since 1868.

 

[Fang]

It's not "Trump's" battle.
It's EVERY AMERICANS BATTLE.
You think this only affects Donald Trump? (wtf?)

LOL. This might be the dumbest post I've read on the internet so far in 2026. You do understand that the SCOTUS was hearing oral arguments based on the Executive Order Trump signed on January 20, 2025? Right?

 

[Unkotare]

Obviously, I don't mean that.
I mean, they're taking advantage of a loophole that's existed since 1868.

And yet, here we are.

 

[Zincwarrior]

There is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

You're not thinking out of the box.

 

[Zincwarrior]

On what grounds?

No fat chicks! Change the law for entry into the US. Quickly Robin, to Capital! We've got to pass the law pronto!

 

[Marener]

It's not "Trump's" battle.
It's EVERY AMERICANS BATTLE.
You think this only affects Donald Trump? (wtf?)

If it’s so important, why aren’t you guys trying to pass an amendment and be done with it?

 

[excalibur]

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

In order to give birth to a citizen you have to be one in the first place

Where does it say that?

You need an amendment saying that to make it work.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Thats what it says not under any other jurisdiction. Other means separate distinct different from. Tourists that give birth to citizens neither do ambassadors. Its not according to law its according to court rulings. The law is clear.

If an illegal rapes an American citizen, do they go to prison? Yes, so that makes them subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If a diplomat commits a crime, all you can do is expel them. They are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US, but their home country.

 

[MarathonMike]

Obviously, I don't mean that.
I mean, they're taking advantage of a loophole that's existed since 1868.

The 14th Amendment and the Impeachment Clause have been shredded by the lawless Democrats.

 

[Hafar1014]

If an illegal rapes an American citizen, do they go to prison? Yes, so that makes them subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If a diplomat commits a crime, all you can do is expel them. They are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US, but their home country.

Thats not what it means and if its in a democrat city he wont go to jail. It means citizen of another country

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Thats not what it means and if its in a democrat city he wont go to jail. It means citizen of another country

It means "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Can a cop from another state give you a ticket in your state? Can a cop from another state give you a ticket in their state?

For example, a sailor found guilty of rape in Okinawa is held and prosecuted by the Japanese, not the US. They do not get a free pass because they are not a citizen of Japan.

There is far more to this than people understand.

 

[Hafar1014]

It means "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Can a cop from another state give you a ticket in your state? Can a cop from another state give you a ticket in their state?

For example, a sailor found guilty of rape in Okinawa is held and prosecuted by the Japanese, not the US. They do not get a free pass because they are not a citizen of Japan.

There is far more to this than people understand.

It doesnt mean law enforcement local jurisdiction it means national citizenship. A tourist visiting America that gives birth doesnt create citizen or a foreign ambassador living here doesnt either

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It doesnt mean law enforcement local jurisdiction it means national citizenship. A tourist visiting America that gives birth doesnt create citizen or a foreign ambassador living here doesnt either

You have the right to be wrong, and you are! In regard to ambassadors, you are correct.

You will be sorely disappointed when the decision is made.

Imagine SCOTUS overturning past precedent. Do you think the court is actually going to strip citizenship from people like Marco Rubio who parents were not US citizens when he was born in the US and has lived here his entire life? Ted Cruz was born in Canada, yet he is and always has been a US citizen because his mother is American born. Rubio could not be President, but Cruz could.

The terms jus soli and jus sanguinis are two completely different concepts. The constitution says jus soli and does not mention jus sanguinis. Jus sanguinis grants citizenship based on federal law, not the Constitution.