Ketanji Brown Jackson Claims Stealing a Wallet in Japan Makes You ‘Locally Owe Allegiance’ in Bizarre Birthright Citiz

[80zephyr]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

There it is. How do we read it correctly? I mean seriously. It appears everything hinges on "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". And it was really comical watching the government's attorney twist himself up like a damn pretzel attempting to dance around that whole jurisdiction thing. Roberts tried to give the poor guy some help. "I don't think you want to use Wong Kim Ark". But he continued to insist that the government does not wish to overturn Wong Kim Ark. Yet the government's position would require that decision to be overturned.

There is a difference between Wong Kim Ark's parents and both Susan and Barbara. Susan and Barbara are both here legally. Wong Kim Ark's parents were here ILLEGALLY, could never hope to be citizens, and had moved BACK TO CHINA at the time of the case. In fact, Wong Kim Ark was detained and denied re-entry into the United States after VISITING HIS PARENTS IN CHINA, that is what initiated the case. Parent's not citizens, not here legally, no permanent domicile, and obviously with an allegiance to China, not the United States. Yet Wong Kim Ark was granted citizenship under the 14th amendment.

A person entering the country ILLEGALLY is not under our jurisdiction. We are in affect giving them a prize for breaking our laws.

 

[Winston]

A person entering the country ILLEGALLY is not under our jurisdiction.

Seriously? Think about that for a moment.

 

[80zephyr]

Seriously? Think about that for a moment.

Stop it. Using your "logic" a person visiting our country and breaking our laws makes them a citizen.

I don't need a moment to think about the absurdity of that.

 

[Winston]

Stop it. Using your "logic" a person visiting our country and breaking our laws makes them a citizen.

I don't need a moment to think about the absurdity of that.

Anyone in this country, rather here legally or illegally, is under the jurisdiction of this country. Except for a few exceptions, like foreign diplomats and their families. It is simple, can you give an illegal alien a parking ticket? A noise ordinance violation? Sure you can. Can you give one to a foreign diplomat? Well yeah, I guess, but you couldn't enforce it. And therein lies the difference.

Interestingly enough, the reverse is also true. Foreign nations have no jurisdiction over their citizens while visiting here. None. Just as we have no jurisdiction over our citizens while they are abroad, unless on our territory, like a military base or an embassy. Rather you realize it or not, the government's position, the one you are supporting, turns all that on it's head.

Never mind that it violates almost five hundred years of common English law. Never mind that it absolutely complicates things from the very beginning of life right up until death itself. It all revolves around some kind of sick fantasy. All these people coming here, traveling thousands of miles, in some cases, literally stepping over dead bodies. The ones that have been here for decades, raised families, in the shadows. They are all part of a well organized, multi national, multi cultural, insidious plot to overthrow our government.

 

[80zephyr]

Anyone in this country, rather here legally or illegally, is under the jurisdiction of this country. Except for a few exceptions, like foreign diplomats and their families. It is simple, can you give an illegal alien a parking ticket? A noise ordinance violation? Sure you can. Can you give one to a foreign diplomat? Well yeah, I guess, but you couldn't enforce it. And therein lies the difference.

Interestingly enough, the reverse is also true. Foreign nations have no jurisdiction over their citizens while visiting here. None. Just as we have no jurisdiction over our citizens while they are abroad, unless on our territory, like a military base or an embassy. Rather you realize it or not, the government's position, the one you are supporting, turns all that on it's head.

Never mind that it violates almost five hundred years of common English law. Never mind that it absolutely complicates things from the very beginning of life right up until death itself. It all revolves around some kind of sick fantasy. All these people coming here, traveling thousands of miles, in some cases, literally stepping over dead bodies. The ones that have been here for decades, raised families, in the shadows. They are all part of a well organized, multi national, multi cultural, insidious plot to overthrow our government.

Lol. No one is arguing that point with you. Do you believe that a foreigner who is under our jurisdiction also a citizen of this country?

Say a person from Germany that is visiting for a week and gets stopped for shoplifting?

 

[Winston]

Lol. No one is arguing that point with you. Do you believe that a foreigner who is under our jurisdiction also a citizen of this country?

Say a person from Germany that is visiting for a week and gets stopped for shoplifting?

Write em up, lock em up if it is grand theft. Send them home after the fine is paid or the time is served or both. But, if they have a baby here, that baby is a citizen.

 

[80zephyr]

Write em up, lock em up if it is grand theft. Send them home after the fine is paid or the time is served or both. But, if they have a baby here, that baby is a citizen.

That is illogical. And most of the world knows it.