- Moderator
- #61
Oh, so now we have Christian-bashing too, huh ?
No. He is bashing people who pretend to be Christian and yet live like they were not. That is why he added "so-called".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, so now we have Christian-bashing too, huh ?
Thy certainly DO APPLY HERE.They do not apply here.
Like all tRumplings you view the Constitution not as an important foundation for our democracy, but a rag to be used and then thrown away when inconvenient.
Not at all, he just tried to blame the Biden administration for the insurrection response.
There was no "insurrection", that is a media hype word and nothing more. In all the charges against over 1000 defendants, the word "insurrection" is nowhere to be seen.Not at all, he just tried to blame the Biden administration for the insurrection response.
It was an insurrection.There was no "insurrection", that is a media hype word and nothing more. In all the charges against over 1000 defendants, the word "insurrection" is nowhere to be seen.
And you are again OFF TOPIC.
As much as I'm against the anti-Israel movement in the United States .. they should not be banned. Free speech can often be offensive and / or unsavory, which is the beauty of the First Amendment; however, once violence takes place, which is a reoccurring pattern we are seeing, each violent anti-Israel gathering should be terminated.
I hope they keep it up .. it's not helping ol' joe!
I'm in the YouTube section of my smart TV. I just counted 26 videos of pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses. I don't see even ONE pro-Israel demonstration.Lets take a gander Columbia U. The both Pro-Israel and Pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Both sides became violent. As did groups at U.C. Berkeley. Administrations decided end the camps, but that is no way to deal with the undelying problems both sides. Mainly neither side will talk to the other.
Brown U decided to sit and talk, listen to the arguments and reached an agreement to invite sides to the session (September) for an forum. Jaw/Jaw is better than War/War. (Winston Churchill).
Speech is no longer protected speech when advocating for violence on people or groups, other than that we should leave it alone and if we don’t like find creative ways of countering it.As much as I'm against the anti-Israel movement in the United States .. they should not be banned. Free speech can often be offensive and / or unsavory, which is the beauty of the First Amendment; however, once violence takes place, which is a reoccurring pattern we are seeing, each violent anti-Israel gathering should be terminated.
I hope they keep it up .. it's not helping ol' joe!
There was no "insurrection", that is a media hype word and nothing more. In all the charges against over 1000 defendants, the word "insurrection" is nowhere to be seen.
And you are again OFF TOPIC.
You put YOUR big boy pants on. I just refuted you. Now when you can come up with the word "insurrection" in the 1000+ charges, post it.It was an insurrection.
Put on your big boy pants and deal with it.
I'm in the YouTube section of my smart TV. I just counted 26 videos of pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses. I don't see even ONE pro-Israel demonstration.
There was the one where they tore down barriers and attacked the Pro-Palestinian protesters. That isn’t very legal.Again, we are talking about violation of law, not freedom of assembly. We do get to determine what our laws are and how they re to be enforced. I don't recall a single pro-Israel demonstration that was done illegally.
You put YOUR big boy pants on. I just refuted you. Now when you can come up with the word "insurrection" in the 1000+ charges, post it.
And you are OFF TOPIC now for the 3rd time. Strike 3.
What "one" was that ?There was the one where they tore down barriers and attacked the Pro-Palestinian protesters. That isn’t very legal.
It was an insurrection.You put YOUR big boy pants on. I just refuted you. Now when you can come up with the word "insurrection" in the 1000+ charges, post it.
And you are OFF TOPIC now for the 3rd time. Strike 3.
That is not any if my reasoning whatsoever.Ok, you round up all the tRumplings and I'll go get the protesters, since by your "reasoning" they all belong in jail.
Must have been one of the many ones you missed:What "one" was that ?