What cases?Judge Merchen told Trump that the gag order, in no way prevents him from testifying.
And we all know why Trump won't testify. Because in the two previous cases where he testified, he lost BIGLY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What cases?Judge Merchen told Trump that the gag order, in no way prevents him from testifying.
And we all know why Trump won't testify. Because in the two previous cases where he testified, he lost BIGLY.
Nope, trump never asked cohen to do anything. In fact, cohen told trump he's got it, whatever it was on the call that cohen got confused with a 14 year old.We then have the recording of Trump telling Cohen to pay it off in cash.
It established, along with corroborating testimony from former Trump employees, that Trump micro-manages the books.Again. Of no actual value.
You need to learn to distinguish between actual material and relevant evidence and the other crap. Business people keep “books.” So what?
There are grounds for appeal all over the place.The jury could also see how the judge didn’t allow the expert defense witness to testify that Trump did not violate any election law. That alone is grounds for an appeal.
what was the evidence of that?It established, along with corroborating testimony from former Trump employees, that Trump micro-manages the books.
What cases?
not allowing a defense in a jury trial is hugely!There are grounds for appeal all over the place.
Nope, trump never asked cohen to do anything. In fact, cohen told trump he's got it, whatever it was on the call that cohen got confused with a 14 year old.
ZzzOpening Statements
An analysis of opening statements in the New York criminal trial and a preview of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump’s immunity appeal.www.msnbc.com
And one of the things that I used to argue when somebody like Michael Cohen has made a tape recording
In fact, what you hear is let’s just pay it in cash.
nope! again, post the audio!Opening Statements
An analysis of opening statements in the New York criminal trial and a preview of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump’s immunity appeal.www.msnbc.com
And one of the things that I used to argue when somebody like Michael Cohen has made a tape recording
In fact, what you hear is let’s just pay it in cash.
I was asking about Trump.Trump fraud ruling adds to his string of legal losses in New York
Former President Donald Trump and his company have been winless in a series of costly, cascading high-profile legal battles in New York in the last 14 months.www.cbsnews.com
Citing anything by a scumbag like Weissman negatively impacts any hope you ever had of having any credibility.Opening Statements
An analysis of opening statements in the New York criminal trial and a preview of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump’s immunity appeal.www.msnbc.com
And one of the things that I used to argue when somebody like Michael Cohen has made a tape recording
In fact, what you hear is let’s just pay it in cash.
Leave alone Cohen and the slut.Citing anything by a scumbag like Weissman negatively impacts any hope you ever had of having any credibility.
Weisselberg was trusted by Donald Trump, and by his father Fred Trump before that.Citing anything by a scumbag like Weissman negatively impacts any hope you ever had of having any credibility.
It will only get worse. Every election cycle seems to be ratcheted up another level.they still believe the falsified dossier that was proven fake. Honestly, the hate of trump is unprecedented by any imagination. worse than ever was directed at hitler. EVER. I don't get it in the least. or the most.
Idiot: Andrew Weissmann - WikipediaWeisselberg was trusted by Donald Trump, and by his father Fred Trump before that.
Suddenly he has no credibility?
no, the prosecution had the obligation to show he did it.Actually the ONLY one who can testify that Trump knew nothing is Trump.
If I was asked if I ever saw Jeffrey Epstein with underage girls, I would have to say "No!"
175.05 isn't in the indictments. More clown show nonsense, injecting uncharged crimes and ridiculous conspiracy theories outside the scope of the actual charges.Falsifying Business Records in the Second Degree - NY Penal Law 175.05
That's NY's criminal law