Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
First, if you believe time is the 4th dimension, then it also includes space. Spacetime are inseparable if we have x, y, and z-axes. Next, we have the BB caused by a singularity. You're just arguing semantics to state the BB created nothing. This is where everything resided and caused the big bang. Anyway, you sound like you're just arguing semantics and not explaining how the energy was created. Are you saying it was God?
There is no such entity as a ''singularity''.
It's you who does not understand. We are talking about the big bang singularity or what caused the big bang. A singularity is an event that by its nature assumed to only happened once and that has no natural explanation. Of course, the atheist scientists make up whatever they want, but won't accept God as the cause or singularity.
There is no such entity as a ''singularity''. As usual, you don't understand the terms and definitions you get from your creation ministries.
First, if you believe time is the 4th dimension, then it also includes space. Spacetime are inseparable if we have x, y, and z-axes. Next, we have the BB caused by a singularity. You're just arguing semantics to state the BB created nothing. This is where everything resided and caused the big bang. Anyway, you sound like you're just arguing semantics and not explaining how the energy was created. Are you saying it was God?
Wow. No. Restrain your leaps of illogic.
- If time isn't a forth dimension, then what is it? Time is the immutable property of space, the first three dimensions, necessary because c does not equal infinity, it takes "time" for a probability wave to traverse a dimension in space, and one could say a factor in differentiating between the two states of Fermions: matter and energy. Solid substance, composite matter, Hadrons-- -- as soon as you remove any one of the four dimensions, they cease to exist, yet both states can be described in terms of a probability wave, the essential quality to a probability event is-- -- time, because probability itself is the description of an event which has a beginning and an end-- -- a "before" and an "after." This is the essential quality of the transitory state of matter.
- The BB caused by a singularity? A singularity is a specific class of object. I think it safer to say that the BB describes an event that happened/started/began in a very small region, perhaps a point of NO space at all (infinitely small space) or a lack of dimension, though that too is incorrect because the BB happened everywhere and nowhere at the same time because the BB couldn't have happened "somewhere" (a vectoral coordinate in space) since space itself is a function of it. You cannot be controlled by or a function of something which you yourself determine. It seems almost necessary then that for an event to occur in essentially infinitely small space for it to then also have essentially infinitely large energy contained within it, but not necessarily CREATED by it. "Released" might be a better term.
- I make no attempt to explain how energy is created or if it is created or to what limit energy is available or possible. That cannot be known without assigning definite limits and boundaries to the physical universe! Merely pointing out that the BB did not need/take energy as we know it to get work "done" because I think it is wrong to think of the BB as being "work," it wasn't an "explosion" in the conventional sense, a release of energy as much as it was more an EXPANSION of space itself with energy in it.
It should.Sorry, that does not compute for me.
If spacetime is all one dimension, the 4th, you have just precluded the need for the first three! So then spacetime would be the FIRST dimension.First, I said the 4th dimension is spacetime. It isn't just the concept of time as we're talking about the universe and its origin.
How did an explanation become "my view?"Anyway, your last paragraph explains your view.
Light is a function of all matter and energy, it is the vectoral boson which is the force carrier for all 1st generation Fermions.It doesn't explain how light was created nor the energy it had to have.
Maybe it was? I don't know why you keep circling back on this rigid assumption that it "took" energy to create spacetime which IS energy. Or that it had to be created. Not all things are knowable. The fish in the pond cannot know the eagle's sky high on the mountain. We are limited by our vantage point of the very tiny trying to look at the very very large. We cannot even see the other side of the room.It also doesn't explain how space and time were created. That took energy, too. It just assumes all of it was there before the big bang.
That, as I understand it, is largely true excepting that there is no “point” or location. Like all the laws of physics which we understand, those laws operate only inside the known universe. As the origin of the universe is necessarily outside the known universe, we can’t immediately assume that the beginning of the universe should be constrained by any known laws of physics. Second, the idea that the universe had a beginning unique to a location (or an entity), is the remnant of an imaginative description by physicists. The term “singularity” used to describe the beginning of the universe is an artifact of the theory of general relativity. Solving the math resolves to a null value as the equations “break down”.There is no such entity as a ''singularity''. As usual, you don't understand the terms and definitions you get from your creation ministries.
We understand a "singularity" as a point where the physical laws of the universe as we know them to stop operating. Essentially a point where so much matter is compressed into so small a region of space that matter makes its final collapse and the nuclear separation of neutrons fail and Bose-Einstein space is taken to its ultimate state where gravity reaches infinity and spacetime curves completely in upon itself. Did I express that well?
Did anyone tell Moses that?You said...When does your Bible state He came back?
I don't understand your question. Do you mean in Revelation?
My Bible states God left the universe and Earth because of sin
I am asking you when did God come back?
God didn't come back and won't come back until the sixth seal is opened. We have Satan as "god of the world and prince of the power of the air."
Did anyone tell Moses that?You said...When does your Bible state He came back?
I don't understand your question. Do you mean in Revelation?
My Bible states God left the universe and Earth because of sin
I am asking you when did God come back?
God didn't come back and won't come back until the sixth seal is opened. We have Satan as "god of the world and prince of the power of the air."
Yes, God told Moses the Ten Commandments. Then Moses wrote them down on the stone tablets.
Are you sure about that?Did anyone tell Moses that?You said...When does your Bible state He came back?
I don't understand your question. Do you mean in Revelation?
My Bible states God left the universe and Earth because of sin
I am asking you when did God come back?
God didn't come back and won't come back until the sixth seal is opened. We have Satan as "god of the world and prince of the power of the air."
Yes, God told Moses the Ten Commandments. Then Moses wrote them down on the stone tablets.
So how is it possible that God was with the Jews all that time if He left?Did anyone tell Moses that?You said...When does your Bible state He came back?
I don't understand your question. Do you mean in Revelation?
My Bible states God left the universe and Earth because of sin
I am asking you when did God come back?
God didn't come back and won't come back until the sixth seal is opened. We have Satan as "god of the world and prince of the power of the air."
Yes, God told Moses the Ten Commandments. Then Moses wrote them down on the stone tablets.
True. The location of a singularity can only be described by the presence of the event hoizon around it. That is the place where for all intents, our space and laws end. Thou dare not tread beyond that point.That, as I understand it, is largely true excepting that there is no “point” or location.
How true. By implication then, these "singularities" are not so much "objects" or things in the known sense as they are places outside our universe, or maybe places where something outside our universe connects to ours.Like all the laws of physics which we understand, those laws operate only inside the known universe. As the origin of the universe is necessarily outside the known universe, we can’t immediately assume that the beginning of the universe should be constrained by any known law of physics.
Yes. One cannot point at a direction in the sky and say it all started over there. There is no center to the universe.Second, the idea that the universe had a beginning unique to a location (or an entity), is the remnant of an imaginative description.
The neutron was discovered in 1932.I learned in high school that energy can’t be created
Yeah, well that was before the neutron was discovered ... we've learn a lot in the 80 years since you left high school ...
There is NO evidence of "created" energy, as you well know, in fact it has been proven by a repeatable experiment that energy can neither be created nor destroyedWhere is the evidence for your created energy?
And there it is, give energy a human personality, and suddenly you have a supernatural God.The best explanation is a supernatural God. He is the dark energy.
Actually space/time began at the big bang, not energy, it is energy that always existed and will always exist in the same total quantity. You have nothing right!!!!!I think what we agreed today is that time and space always existed
So you believe in TWO Gods!!!!!God didn't come back and won't come back until the sixth seal is opened. We have Satan as "god of the world and prince of the power of the air."
Here you go again with this disproven crap again!The problem with a cyclical universe is with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. For every matter to energy or energy to matter exchange there is a loss of usable energy. So while the total energy of the universe does not decrease, the usable energy of the universe does decrease. If it is a periodic or cyclical universe then the entropy will increase with each cycle. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is a fundamental law of nature which tells us that entropy can only increase or stay the same. Entropy can never decrease. Which means that in a finite amount of time, a finite system will reach a maximum state of disorder which is called thermal equilibrium and then it will stay in that state. A cyclical universe cannot avoid this problem. Since we do not see thermal equilibrium (good thing too because there would be no life) we know that the universe did have a beginning.
If spacetime is all one dimension, the 4th, you have just precluded the need for the first three! So then spacetime would be the FIRST dimension.
How did an explanation become "my view?"
Light is a function of all matter and energy, it is the vectoral boson which is the force carrier for all 1st generation Fermions.
Light is a function of all matter and energy, it is the vectoral boson which is the force carrier for all 1st generation Fermions.
Maybe it was? I don't know why you keep circling back on this rigid assumption that it "took" energy to create spacetime which IS energy. Or that it had to be created. Not all things are knowable. The fish in the pond cannot know the eagle's sky high on the mountain. We are limited by our vantage point of the very tiny trying to look at the very very large. We cannot even see the other side of the room.
Yes. One cannot point at a direction in the sky and say it all started over there. There is no center to the universe.
So how is it possible that God was with the Jews all that time if He left?