Alex Baldwin vindicated

[Skylar]

If you point a gun at someone without ensuring the gun is safe, YOU are NEGLIGENT. If that gun fires killing a person, THAT is homicide. Alec Baldwin is GUILTY of NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE.

Civilly, yes. Criminally....apparently not.

 

[Concerned American]

He was pointing the gun at the camera because that's what the shot called for.

Did the shot call for the death of anyone? NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE. Just as negligent as if he had gotten shit-faced drunk and ran his car into a crowd of people killing a couple.

 

[Skylar]

Did the shot call for the death of anyone? NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE. Just as negligent as if he had gotten shit-faced drunk and ran his car into a crowd of people killing a couple.

Says you. The prosecutors say otherwise, at least for now.

 

[SaxonJackson]

He was pointing the gun at the camera because that's what the shot called for.

Unfortunately ... he did MUCH MORE than just point a gun at a camera. He pulled the hammer back on a loaded gun; pointed it at a woman; and pulled the trigger. Two VERY different things.

Anyone who knows anything at all about guns will tell you that you NEVER point a gun at anyone unless you plan on shooting them. Secondly ... you always treat a firearm as if it's loaded even if you don't think it is.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Actually. No it isn’t unfair or unjust. First. The practices on a film set are different than the rest of the world. Second. The pistol was destroyed during testing thus making the key piece of evidence unavailable for Defense testing and experts to examine it. That means the key piece of evidence was certainly going to be excluded from the trial.

So a dismissal was all but inevitable.

just like hilliary's emails and computers were 'unavailable;'. LOLOL

 

[Skylar]

Unfortunately ... he did MUCH MORE than just point a gun at a camera. He pulled the hammer back on a loaded gun; pointed it at a woman; and pulled the trigger. Two VERY different things.

Anyone who knows anything at all about guns will tell you that you NEVER point a gun at anyone unless you plan on shooting them. Secondly ... you always treat a firearm as if it's loaded even if you don't think it is.

As Baldwin's civil settlements demonstrate, he clearly has culpability in the death of his cinematographer.

Criminally, all charges were dropped, at least for now.

This is. You can agree or disagree with it. But that doesn't change the reality of it.

 

[SaxonJackson]

As Baldwin's civil settlements demonstrate, he clearly has culpability in the death of his cinematographer.

Criminally, all charges were dropped, at least for now.

This is. You can agree or disagree with it. But that doesn't change the reality of it.

You don't owe civil damages for a crime unless a crime was committed. Just because some "woke," activist judge let the murderer off of the hook doesn't mean that he doesn't deserve at least 10 years for manslaughter.

 

[Skylar]

You don't owe civil damages for a crime unless a crime was committed. Just because some "woke," activist judge let the murderer off of the hook doesn't mean that he doesn't deserve at least 10 years for manslaughter.

You owe civil damages if there are tortable damages.

Do you understand the difference between civil and criminal? Because it doesn't sound like you do.

And your personal opinion on what someone 'deserves' is perfectly irrelevant to anything legal outcome.....unless you're on the jury.

Which you most certainly aren't. As there never was one.

 

[SaxonJackson]

You owe civil damages if there are tortable damages.

Do you understand the difference between civil and criminal? Because it doesn't sound like you do.

And your personal opinion on what someone 'deserves' is perfectly irrelevant to anything legal outcome.....unless you're on the jury.

Which you most certainly aren't. As there never was one.

He owes lots of damages, and he owes society time in prison. He's clearly dangerous. We already knew he was deranged.

 

[Skylar]

He owes lots of damages, and he owes society time in prison.

The former is being taken care of in civil court and through settlements.

The latter is your personal opinion and legally irrelevant.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He was pointing the gun at the camera because that's what the shot called for.

No it didn't you deranged loon

 

[Skylar]

No it didn't you deranged loon

Yes, it did. That's why both the camera operator and the cinemotographer were hit. They were both beside the camera.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Gun safety dictates that the very first thing you do is check to see for yourself. Baldwin is an asshole who needs to have his ass kicked.

Why would a gun as a movie prop have a firing pin?

 

[SaxonJackson]

Why would a gun as a movie prop have a firing pin?

Because the producer of the movie was a friggin' dumbf***.

 

[Concerned American]

Because the producer of the movie was a friggin' dumbf***.

Baldwin was one of six producers.

 

[skye]

Of course he was vindicated, that goes without saying!
He IS a demonRat.

 

[SavannahMann]

just like hilliary's emails and computers were 'unavailable;'. LOLOL

You guys need to learn the law. Seriously.



This explains why Trump’s DOJ didn’t indict Hillary. And why Trump is facing indictment. It isn’t the similarities. It is the differences.

 

[Skylar]

You guys need to learn the law. Seriously.



This explains why Trump’s DOJ didn’t indict Hillary. And why Trump is facing indictment. It isn’t the similarities. It is the differences.

Oh, this guys great. I miss his old video editor though.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Why would a gun as a movie prop have a firing pin?

It doesn't matter, if you pick up a gun you ALWAYS check whether it is loaded before you do anything else with it.

 

[Concerned American]

It doesn't matter, if you pick up a gun you ALWAYS check whether it is loaded before you do anything else with it.

Next thing is "I didn't know the knife was sharp and pointy when I stabbed him with it."