Staggering climate contradiction - data that can be fudged says "warming," data that cannot be fudged says "no warming"

[Dagosa]

Traitor as a Democrat? No because I am Republican. Come to think of it, you are the traitor over trying to scare the hell out of the public. This might be illegal.

No shit. You’re a traitor like Trump is.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No shit. You’re a traitor like Trump is.

That is a troll from another board who shitposts for attention.

 

[Dagosa]

See how unscientific you actually are? This was about calculus. You love talking calculus a lot And when you get it talked about, you have a fit.

Illiterate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I’m fine with you making your own choices not to get shots and dying at a higher rate….it’s happened and I feel fine with it.
Climate change ? Red states shouldn’t get the benefits of federal aid it they are red states….fine with me. You’re in your own Florida in the next storm surge. You think federal agencies lie to you, fine, fix up your own mess. You don’t trust NASA ? Make sure no red states get contract work for the next space exploitation.

Does it bother you at all that you can’t answer a simple scientific question?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Does it bother you at all that you can’t answer a simple scientific question?

But francis, your answers are all wrong.

 

[Dagosa]

Does it bother you at all that you can’t answer a simple scientific question?

You’ve yet to ask one. If it were scientific, it would be accompanied by evidence science illiterate.

 

[Dagosa]

Fort Fun Indiana

Illiterate.

You’ve yet to ask one. If it were scientific, it would be accompanied by evidence science illiterate.

You luv bragging about shit you know nothing about. I doubt you can fly a kite.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

But francis, your answers are all wrong.

You’re confused. I’m asking a very simple scientific question.

Your side lacks the self awareness to realize you’re being played.

You’d rather call me stupid names than either provide an answer or realize there is a massive problem with your AGW “theory”

 

[Dagosa]

You’re confused. I’m asking a very simple scientific question.

And what is it ? It makes no sense what so ever.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

And what is it ? It makes no sense what so ever.

Your side claims that increasing CO2 from 280 to 420 PPM “raises temperatures” all we’re asking is “how much”?

 

[Dagosa]

Your side claims that increasing CO2 from 280 to 420 PPM “raises temperatures” all we’re asking is “how much”?

My side ? Where. Show the link….it could just be your made up lie of what someone has said….show the link…

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fort Fun Indiana


You luv bragging about shit you know nothing about. I doubt you can fly a kite.

Uh...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

My side ? Where. Show the link….it could just be your made up lie of what someone has said….show the link…

Aren’t you a card carrying member of the Death to America AGW lunatic fringe cult?

 

[Dagosa]

Aren’t you a card carrying member of the Death to America AGW lunatic fringe cult?

So you are making up shit again…you have no question of any consequence., A supporter of the biggest liar in history claims everyone everyone else lies…

 

[Dagosa]

Aren’t you a card carrying member of the Death to America AGW lunatic fringe cult?

I’m not the one who thinks every climate change research facility lies about it. That’s your thing…

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why can’t the “science” guys provide a non-imaginary number in response to: how much does temperature increase when we control all variables and vary CO2 from 280 to 420PPM?

 

[Dagosa]

Why can’t the “science” guys provide a non-imaginary number in response to: how much does temperature increase when we control all variables and vary CO2 from 280 to 420PPM?

Because you can’t tell anyone where you got those numbers. Your obviously ARE science illiterate. The temperature change is dependent on the CO2 increase, but lots of other factors too. What are they ? List them if you can or give your source, come on expert, tell us. You know more than NASA….maybe you didn’t know that….wtf knows. Youre so stupid in asking it’s really hard to tell.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Because you can’t tell anyone where you got those numbers. Your obviously ARE science illiterate. The temperature change is dependent on the CO2 increase, but lots of other factors too. What are they ? List them if you can or give your source, come on expert, tell us. You know more than NASA….maybe you didn’t know that….wtf knows. Youre so stupid in asking it’s really hard to tell.

You just made the case for the skeptics! Thank you! That's EXACTLY what we've been saying!

If there are "lots of other factors too" (variations in Earth's magnetic field, albedo effect, urban heat island measurements) how much is attributable to the de minimis increase in CO2? .002F?

The AGWCult is just pulling numbers out of the air because they know how unkind any laboratory experiment is to their USA killing "theory". Very likely there is virtually no warming from the increase in CO2, it's a small fraction of a degree, far less than even a tenth of a degree

 

[Dagosa]

You just made the case for the skeptics! Thank you! That's EXACTLY what we've been saying!

If there are "lots of other factors too" (variations in Earth's magnetic field, albedo effect, urban heat island measurements) how much is attributable to the de minimis increase in CO2? .002F?

The AGWCult is just pulling numbers out of the air because they know how unkind any laboratory experiment is to their USA killing "theory". Very likely there is virtually no warming from the increase in CO2, it's a small fraction of a degree, far less than even a tenth of a degree

Seems to be way over your head.
Foolish, I just asked what the mitigating factors are…you could not answer but made your usual stupid remark..
Hey non reader science illiterate…you are wrong again…
You are stupid….because there ARE variables idiot all measurements are taken in the same place in the atmosphere foolish. Every stupid assumption you make is countered by reality. Now remind us how ignorant you are….
Mid-troposphere

---

It's important to understand that “parts per million” refers to the number of carbon dioxide molecules per million molecules of dry air. These measurements are from the mid-troposphere, the layer of Earth's atmosphere that is 8 to 12 kilometers (about 5 to 7 miles) above the ground.

Carbon Dioxide - Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet​

climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/?intent=121

 

[Dagosa]

You just made the case for the skeptics! Thank you! That's EXACTLY what we've been saying!

If there are "lots of other factors too" (variations in Earth's magnetic field, albedo effect, urban heat island measurements) how much is attributable to the de minimis increase in CO2? .002F?

The AGWCult is just pulling numbers out of the air because they know how unkind any laboratory experiment is to their USA killing "theory". Very likely there is virtually no warming from the increase in CO2, it's a small fraction of a degree, far less than even a tenth of a degree

You are really too stupid to know how to ask a question about AGW. No wonder you voted for Trump.