the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Near freefall speed....the free fall speed claim has been disproven
Everyone with eyes saw it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Near freefall speed....the free fall speed claim has been disproven
Near free fall speed is not free fall speed nor is it essentially free fall speed.Near freefall speed....the free fall speed claim has been disproven
Everyone with eyes saw it.
Without demolition charges on the columns, the towers would not have collapsed straight down at all....whether you're talking seconds , minutes or hours....would not have happened...Near free fall speed is not free fall speed nor is it essentially free fall speed.Near freefall speed....the free fall speed claim has been disproven
Everyone with eyes saw it.
No government agency made any such claim.
Exactly,the sheep in the world seem eager to let them get away with anything,now they are pulling off this fake Covid hoax which has taken what little freedoms we still had left after 9/11 gone from us for good.If they can get away with 9/11 they can get away with anything no matter how crazy it is.Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.
The castle's already been stormed.Exactly,the sheep in the world seem eager to let them get away with anything,now they are pulling off this fake Covid hoax which has taken what little freedoms we still had left after 9/11 gone from us for good.
Absolutely wrongWithout demolition charges on the columns, the towers would not have collapsed straight down at all....whether you're talking seconds , minutes or hours....would not have happened...Near free fall speed is not free fall speed nor is it essentially free fall speed.Near freefall speed....the free fall speed claim has been disproven
Everyone with eyes saw it.
No government agency made any such claim.
Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
WrongStill wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, and a lot more collateral damage ( something the bad guys wanted to avoid, obviously) not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellowI see you're still whining about all the times I have owned you.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellow langley troll candyass.lol
I admit when I am wrong you only repeat lies
You are the only troll here.
You define the word
A member here for 7 years and still hasn't figured out how to operate the quote feature.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellowI see you're still whining about all the times I have owned you.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellow langley troll candyass.lol
I admit when I am wrong you only repeat lies
You are the only troll here.
You define the word
Maybe the same person.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellow langley troll candyass.lol
Yes she never has figured that out which is why I did not use it when responding to the trollA member here for 7 years and still hasn't figured out how to operate the quote feature.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellowI see you're still whining about all the times I have owned you.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellow langley troll candyass.lol
I admit when I am wrong you only repeat lies
You are the only troll here.
You define the word
No lots of people are smarter than you not just meMaybe the same person.Still wrong again as always.Absolutely wrong
They fell exactly as they should have without any fictitious charges
The top of the North Tower which was hit first,
would have fallen 8 to 10 floors and the careened outward in the direction of impact ( northward) because of the opposite resistance of the massive steel columns. Basic common sense should tell you that.
View attachment 399739
Not even the massive amount of weight of the upper South Tower collapsing could have overcome the upward force from those columns and gone straight down at near freefall speed without 'help. It would have toppled toward the southeast.
View attachment 399740
What should have remained would have been two giant stumps, not piles of pulverized steel and concrete all the way to ground level. It's impossible.
wrong is a word he is a speciality at same as fellow langley troll candyass.lol