Tucker Carlson Blows 9/11 Open, Controlled Demolition, Implicates Israeli Agents. Prompted Real ID Even Though Suspects Were Known

No ma’am. You are the one making the claims. Ergo, you have the burden of proof.

Do try to meet it or stfu.


No, you claimed 107 happened, so you need to fly a motorized paraglider for us.

CO2 FRAUD refuted and Land Near the Poles proven in Environment Section.
 
No, you claimed 107 happened, so you need to fly a motorized paraglider for us.

CO2 FRAUD refuted and Land Near the Poles proven in Environment Section.

No, you claimed 107 happened, so you need to fly a motorized paraglider for us.

Unless you fly a jet into a building, you can't claim 9/11 happened?

You've actually gotten more retarded.
 
No, you claimed 107 happened, so you need to fly a motorized paraglider for us.
10/7 obviously happened.

And no. I have no need to do any paragliding of any kind.

See what happens when you try to connect unrelated things and concepts?

Nah. You probably don’t.
CO2 FRAUD refuted
What CO2 fraud? If you’re attempting to say that you have personally refuted the silly claim of AGW, I have to tell you. You’re absurd. Two things can be true. (1). AGW is bullshit and (2). YOU have never refuted it.
and Land Near the Poles proven in Environment Section.
^ that’s not even a sentence.
 
No, you claimed 107 happened, so you need to fly a motorized paraglider for us.

Unless you fly a jet into a building, you can't claim 9/11 happened?

You've actually gotten more retarded.


One of the problems is that every non Jewish pilot of the 757 aircraft will tell you that you cannot fly it with its nose 8 feet off the ground at 600 mph....

To prove 911 was actually as stated, try to do that, fly a 757 at 600mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground...

911 is toast, 70% of Americans don't believe it, and the other 30% are you sick liars and your drone army of self proclaimed sub humans.

107, that's coming apart really fast too...
 
10/7 obviously happened


LOL!!!

Really....

Do you also do your dry cleaning in Gaza?


The "dry cleaned Hamas" is yet another proof that the "hostage movie" is complete BS...
 
LOL!!!

Really....

Do you also do your dry cleaning in Gaza?


The "dry cleaned Hamas" is yet another proof that the "hostage movie" is complete BS...
Wrong.

Your disbelief in something doesn’t falsify it.
 
Fully half the country watches Tucker Carlson. This is like a religious conversion for him.


"Showcasing US Senator Ron Johnson saying recently about WTC Building 7 on 9/11: ā€œI don’t think you could find structural engineers that would say that thing came down any other way but controlled demolition,ā€ former supporter of the government’s narrative on 9/11, Tucker Carlson, now has reversed himself and called for a new investigation.

Carlson joins some New York fire commissioners and many others who have called the official story necessarily false, and called for a new investigation.

WTC 7 is the third tower that fell in seconds on 9/11, although it was never hit by a plane.

In March 2025 the important firefighters’ professional journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas published an official position on WTC 7 which challenged the official story, writing:

ā€œSudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.ā€

In his new docu-series ā€œThe 9/11 Files,ā€ Carlson crosses into previously absolutely taboo territory by reporting the well-known fact – to those in the 9/11 truth community – that police had arrested five Israeli men later determined to be Israeli Mossad Secret Service agents, whose van tested positive for explosives and were carrying numerous false passports and large amounts of cash.

In 2001 Fox News reporter Carl Cameron reported that a highly placed investigator in the US government said there are ā€œtiesā€between the ā€œDancing Israeliā€ Mossad agents arrests in NYC on 9/11 and the attacks. Cameron then said that any further information on links between the Israeli agents and 9/11 was ā€œclassified.ā€

The 9/11 Files Episode 4 (key episode, WTC 7, Israel)


Full series The 9/11 Files



Fox News Carl Cameran, US sources say there were ā€œtiesā€ between ā€œdancing Israelisā€ and 9/11 but that it is ā€œclassified informationā€

...

Put most simply, engineers, physicists, and other scientists such as those at 2,000+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth try to explain that no steel skyscraper can collapse to the ground at the speed that a rock drops through thin air without the steel being cut to pieces from the inside.

In the illustration below, the reader must agree that the block on the upper right will reach the ground much faster than the one the left, because the massive resistance of the intact frame would slow it down, and more likely stop it altogether.

But if the government’s 9/11 account is true, both blocks reach the ground at the same time.

Carlson uses a clip of none other than President Trump, speaking right after the attacks, saying that as an experienced builder, he is absolutely certain that the buildings contained explosives.

image-3.png



The official 9/11 explanation, say many, violates fundamental laws of physics...

...

9/11 Kicks Off Move Toward Master Database, National Identification Real ID​

There is no better example of how 9/11 is still impacting Americans’ lives – and why it is still important – than the Trump administration’s push to roll out Real ID, a facial recognition and other biometrics -based ID which will consolidate all information about every American into a master, distributed database, which could eventually include medical records and financial transactions, all updated in real-time.

9/11 prompted the Real ID Act of 2005, which is only now being aggressively rolled-out by Trump. Real ID is being opposed as unconstitutional on both the left and the right. Constitutional case law centering on the Fourth Amendment, no search without a warrant, is still evolving.

The system has been called odious and un-American, and would resembled the total social control system now used in China.

MORE..."

You do realize that tUcker cArlson himself has said that his programs are for entertainment purposes and no one should take them seriously, right?
 
One of the problems is that every non Jewish pilot of the 757 aircraft will tell you that you cannot fly it with its nose 8 feet off the ground at 600 mph....

To prove 911 was actually as stated, try to do that, fly a 757 at 600mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground...

911 is toast, 70% of Americans don't believe it, and the other 30% are you sick liars and your drone army of self proclaimed sub humans.

107, that's coming apart really fast too...

every non Jewish pilot of the 757 aircraft will tell you that you cannot fly it with its nose 8 feet off the ground at 600 mph....

Of course you can, for a few feet.
 
every non Jewish pilot of the 757 aircraft will tell you that you cannot fly it with its nose 8 feet off the ground at 600 mph....

Of course you can, for a few feet.


Then YOU DEMONSTRATE THAT FOR US....
 
^^^^^

A confession 911 was a Zionist Fascist Hate Hoax
 
No ma’am. You are the one making the claims. Ergo, you have the burden of proof.

Do try to meet it or stfu.
If YOU are making the claim that the official narrative regarding attacks at WTC is true and accurate, which seems to be what you do on this thread, then the burden of proof falls on YOU.

All the facts and evidence contradict the official narrative. You cannot prove the official narrative is true and accurate, except in your own tortured mind.
 
15th post
If YOU are making the claim that the official narrative regarding attacks at WTC is true and accurate, which seems to be what you do on this thread, then the burden of proof falls on YOU.

All the facts and evidence contradict the official narrative. You cannot prove the official narrative is true and accurate, except in your own tortured mind.

All the facts and evidence contradict the official narrative.

All of them?

Post your top 5.
 
All the facts and evidence contradict the official narrative.

All of them?

Post your top 5.
No Boeing at the Pentagon, AA11 at North Tower, UA175 at South Tower, UA93 in Shanksville, office furniture fires brought down the towers, fires brought down WTC7
 
No Boeing at the Pentagon, AA11 at North Tower, UA175 at South Tower, UA93 in Shanksville, office furniture fires brought down the towers, fires brought down WTC7

No planes involved?

I thought you said you had facts?
 
So precisely HOW are the "Hamas" getting their dry cleaned uniforms?
🄱
Y'all ain't as smart as you think you are... FASCIST!!!
You’re too stupid to breathe.

And **** yourself with your mindless misuse of the word ā€œfascist.ā€ You moron.
If YOU are making the claim that the official narrative regarding attacks at WTC is true and accurate, which seems to be what you do on this thread, then the burden of proof falls on YOU.
Wrong. When the OP starts the ball rolling with the simple minded post that 9/11 official narrative is false, it is the OP who carries the burden, you imbecile.
All the facts and evidence contradict the official narrative.
Nonsense.
You cannot prove the official narrative is true and accurate, except in your own tortured mind.
You haven’t demonstrated shit about the alleged falsity of the official narrative. And you can’t.

But let’s see what you’ve got.

First question. Exactly when did the teams of people needed to set up the explosives necessary to take down the twin towers so that? How long did it take? Where did they conceal the explosives and the detonator cords etc? If they were in plain view, why did none of the folks who worked there ever mention it to anyone?

If they weren’t in plain view, where did they get hidden? Presumably they’d have to be hidden at the supporting structures inside the towers, to be effective. Again, then, when did any crews do such significant construction work as a cover to gain access to those key places? How long in advance did they have to be there?

To do all of that, wouldn’t they have to know when some Islamic Jihadist terrorists were planning on flying hijacked aircraft into the twin towers? Or were they planted there during the original construction of the towers just awaiting a day when some shitbags would plan that attack?

Under any of your usernames, you can’t answer these questions with anything factually based because you haven’t no such facts or evidence at hand.

You are not able to think through the implications of all that would be necessary for your insane conspiracy bullshit to be true. You’re a joke.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom