Zone1 25 years after 9/11, Muslims dominate Times Square

[Robert W]

With all due respect to the Generals, if your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

Saddam was effectively restricted to Baghdad. The Kurds had de facto independence in the North, and the Shi'ites had de facto independence in the South.

He didn't have the capability to rebuild his military. (The fact that we mopped Iraq up in less than three weeks shows that.)

Bush's revenge fantasy made things worse over there, absolutely.

You will of course refuse to read two authority's books on that war. Why the hell you are like that, who knows? You have a powerful affinity to Muslims including Saddam Hussein.

 

[JoeB131]

You will of course refuse to read two authority's books on that war. Why the hell you are like that, who knows? You have a powerful affinity to Muslims including Saddam Hussein.

Um, we spent 20 years flopping around that country, taking thousands of casualties, and acheiving nothing but angering the entire Middle East against us.

And at the end of the day, it was over a lie.

Saddam didn't have Weapons of Mass Destruction, and he wasn't working with Al Qaeda ( which considered him too secular.)

And as a result, we got ISIS, we got expanded Iranian influence in the region.

 

[Robert W]

Um, we spent 20 years flopping around that country, taking thousands of casualties, and acheiving nothing but angering the entire Middle East against us.

And at the end of the day, it was over a lie.

Saddam didn't have Weapons of Mass Destruction, and he wasn't working with Al Qaeda ( which considered him too secular.)

And as a result, we got ISIS, we got expanded Iranian influence in the region.

Saddam DID have weapons of mass destruction. Saddam had them trucked and flown to Syria. Had you read even De Long's book, you would understand this. Also General of Iraq's Air Force told the same story.
I posted some of what Delong said to an audience and his story is what I keep telling.

 

[hadit]

Ignored most of this racist rant, but let's look at these comments.



No, he won because the best the oppossition could offer is a corrupt mayor who sold out his own city for a pardon, a corrupt ex-governor who was driven out of office for playing grab-ass, and an attention-seeking ass-clown.



Mandami hasn't tried to remove any dogs.


Given that it was a historically large snow-storm, I don't see how that's his fault, exactly. Did all the Streets and Sanitation guys suddenly forget how to do their jobs? Or was there just so much snow that they couldn't cope with it?

I am reminded of the Winter of 79, when Michael Bilandic, who was a pretty decent mayor, lost to Jane Byrne, who wasn't. Why? Because a combination of record snow and record cold choked the city's response.

What would the reaction from city authorities be if hundreds of Christians crowded Times Square to celebrate an Easter sunrise service, blocking sidewalks and streets?

 

[EMH]

70% of Americans have an IQ over 5 and a molecule of patriotism to America, and hence figured out long ago that 911 was a hate hoax.

Only the self proclaimed sub humans haven't.

How many elections will this state of treasonous bigoted anti conservative idiocy benefit the Democrats?

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

25 years after 9/11, Muslims dominate Times Square​

This is a very deliberate move by an aggressive and hate-filled Muslim preacher to expand Islam’s reach in New York City.​

25 years after 9/11, Muslims dominate Times Square

This is a very deliberate move by an aggressive and hate-filled Muslim preacher to expand Islam’s reach in New York City.

www.americanthinker.com

21 Feb 2026 ~~ By Andrea Widburg

Anyone who was sentient on September 11, 2001, remembers the sheer horror of that day...and of the days after as people coped with the sudden, indescribable, and (before most people knew about the nature of Islam) seemingly incomprehensible terrorist act that cruelly killed almost 3,000 people, most of them Americans who called New York their home. But New York isn’t that same city anymore.
Twenty-five years later, there’s a very Islamic mayor in Gracie Mansion and hundreds of Muslims are gathering regularly in Times Square to block traffic flow for their Ramadan prayers.
Ramadan is an annual month-long observation to remember the month in which Mohamed received the revelations he put in the Koran. For Muslims, it’s a day without lunch, since they must fast between breakfast at dawn and dinner at sunset.

​

~Snip~
For devout Muslims, in the evening, in addition to breaking the fast, they often perform extra prayers, although there’s no requirement to do so. Nor is there a requirement that they perform their prayers on the public sidewalk—complete with prayer mats—in the heart of a busy, theoretically non-Islamic city. Yet that’s exactly what New York’s Muslims have been doing in Times Square:

xxxxxxxxxx
​

~Snip~
What many won’t report? The radical force behind this new annual event. That man is Sohail - known as WAYOFLIFESQ. Over 2.23 million subscribers on YouTube. Nearly 723,000 followers on Instagram. His real game? Spreading raw hostility toward the West. And he uses his young kids as props for his dangerous propaganda.
He flat-out says Islam won’t stop until it enters every home. He brands non-Muslims “kuffar”—filthy, evil, subhuman under Sharia. Jews? Smeared nonstop. Christians? Mocked. LGBTQ? Harassed and ridiculed. Ex-Muslims? Bullied silent.
That’s no accident. It’s not because Sohail’s some fringe extremist they reject. He’s their proxy. He says out loud what too many quietly accept: Supremacy. Dawah as dominance. Unity above all—even backing a guy who harasses, intimidates, mocks Jesus, twists Christianity, and indoctrinates kids.
When someone like this grabs the spotlight to flex Islamic power in our streets, the community doesn’t disown him. They let him represent.
This isn’t innocent prayer. It’s a calculated show of force.

See the full report here: https://rairfoundation.com/weaponizing-kids-mocking-jesus-dark-truth-behind-largest/​

Nor is Sohail alone in his dehumanizing hatred for America, Jews, Christians, gays, and others. This is standard Muslim preaching in many Islamic communities across America:

​

~Snip~
This is what happens in a city when 80% of potential voters stay home—the lunatic fringe takes over and opens the city gates to the invaders.
Pluralism is unknown in true Islam. Just as Turkey’s Erdoğan once explained that democracy is a train that you ride until you reach your destination (e.g., sufficient power to take over), and then you get off, for true Muslims, religious tolerance is that train: You take advantage of it until you can gain control. And then you take control with brutal, absolute force, something borne out by Islamic history at all times and in all places across the world since Mohamed first preached.


Commentary:
This is what happens in a city when 80% of potential voters stay home.
New York City got what they voted and are already rue the day.
Mayor Zohran Mamdani did not win because he is a Socialist, Muslim, it’s simple: Mayor Mamdani thinks he won because of the "Revolution", he won because voters want Free Stuff, Free Food Stamps, Free "Medicaid For All", Free Daycare, Free Bus rides. DSA Marxists won on Nov 4, 2025 because Americans were offered Free Stuff.
Zorhan Mandami promised a lot and has delivered nothing but incompetence and now demands high property taxes cutting Library and NYPD funding and removal of all pet dogs..
New Yorkers received their first lesson with a snow storm by lack of Mandami's coordination in a snow emergency with piled snow and piled garbage for weeks.
Indeed Muslims celebrated the first day of Ramadan in Times Square. It won't matter after Monday with streets clogged with snow and garbage.
I wonder how long New York residents of the five boroughs will and can tolerate this Mayor in his incompetence, ineptitude and lack of leadership.
As of February 2026, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has proposed a preliminary budget that includes a potential 9.5% property tax increase as a "last resort" to bridge a $5.4 billion budget gap. The plan also includes $29 million in cuts to public library systems and reductions in the NYPD budget.

MAGA lawmaker launches ‘Protecting Puppies from Sharia Act’

Representative Randy Fine was slammed for claiming for suggesting ‘the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one’

www.the-independent.com

xxxxxxxxxx​

Mamdani set to unveil record $122B budget — fueled by proposed NYC property tax hike

The mayor’s record proposal included an ultimatum to Albany to tax the rich or he’ll slap the Big Apple with a massive property tax hike.

nypost.com

xxxxxxxxxx​

xxxxxxxxxx​

Deu 28:43 The foreigner who is among you will mount up above you higher and higher, and you will come down lower and lower.
Deu 28:44 He will lend to you, and you won’t lend to him. He will be the head, and you will be the tail.

 

[JoeB131]

Saddam DID have weapons of mass destruction.

Guy, you have no credibility when you say shit like this.

 

[Robert W]

Guy, you have no credibility when you say shit like this.

Two Generals said Saddam shipped his WMD to Syria. So do we take your word, a loyal fan of Saddam Hussein, or the two Generals. Guess who I trust. You really litter this board up with your unhealthy support for Saddam Hussein.
We might gasp, oh no, that you support Muslims.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I was just there. Muslims do not dominate Times Square.

This is fear porn for terrified white sissies.

 

[Doc7505]

I was just there. Muslims do not dominate Times Square.

This is fear porn for terrified white sissies.

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Muslims gather in New York's Times Square for first ​

'Tarawih' prayers​

​

Commentary:
Significant demographic shifts in Brooklyn and Queens, NY, have indeed transformed many neighborhoods, with Asian and Middle Eastern majority communities representing some of the fastest-growing populations in these boroughs. These changes, driven by Biden open borders and relocation within the city, have created, expanded, and ethnic of Central American, Pakistani, Chinese, Afghan and Indian enclaves

 

[JoeB131]

Two Generals said Saddam shipped his WMD to Syria. So do we take your word, a loyal fan of Saddam Hussein, or the two Generals. Guess who I trust. You really litter this board up with your unhealthy support for Saddam Hussein.
We might gasp, oh no, that you support Muslims.

I'll believe the experts on such things, not a couple of generals trying to save face for a criminal president.

No WMD in Iraq

Contradicting the main argument for a war that has cost more than 1,000 American lives, the top U.S. arms inspector said Wednesday he found no evidence that Iraq (news - web sites) produced any weapons of mass destruction after 1991. He also concluded that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s capabilities to develop such weapon had dimmed — not grown — during a dozen years of sanctions before last year's U.S. invasion.

Contrary to prewar statements by President Bush and top administration officials, Saddam did not have chemical and biological stockpiles when the war began and his nuclear capabilities were deteriorating, not advancing, said Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group.

The findings come less than four weeks before an election in which Bush's handling of Iraq has become the central issue. Democratic candidate John Kerry has seized on comments by the former U.S. administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, that the United States did not have enough troops in Iraq to prevent lawlessness after Saddam was toppled.

The inspector's report could boost Kerry's contention that Bush rushed to war based on faulty intelligence and that United Nations sanctions and U.N. weapons inspectors should have been given more time.

The report avoids direct comparisons with prewar claims by the Bush administration on Iraq's weapons systems. But Duelfer largely reinforces the conclusions of his predecessor, David Kay, who said in January, "We were almost all wrong" on Saddam's weapons programs. The White House did not endorse Kay's findings then, noting Duelfer's team was still searching for weapons.

Duelfer found that Saddam, hoping to end U.N. sanctions, gradually began ending prohibited weapons programs starting in 1991. But as Iraq started receiving money through the U.N. oil-for-food program in the late 1990s, and as enforcement of the sanctions weakened, Saddam was able to take steps to rebuild his military, such as acquiring parts for missile systems.

However, the erosion of sanctions stopped after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Duelfer found, preventing Saddam from pursuing weapons of mass destruction.

 

[Robert W]

I'll believe the experts on such things, not a couple of generals trying to save face for a criminal president.

No WMD in Iraq

Contradicting the main argument for a war that has cost more than 1,000 American lives, the top U.S. arms inspector said Wednesday he found no evidence that Iraq (news - web sites) produced any weapons of mass destruction after 1991. He also concluded that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s capabilities to develop such weapon had dimmed — not grown — during a dozen years of sanctions before last year's U.S. invasion.

Contrary to prewar statements by President Bush and top administration officials, Saddam did not have chemical and biological stockpiles when the war began and his nuclear capabilities were deteriorating, not advancing, said Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group.

The findings come less than four weeks before an election in which Bush's handling of Iraq has become the central issue. Democratic candidate John Kerry has seized on comments by the former U.S. administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, that the United States did not have enough troops in Iraq to prevent lawlessness after Saddam was toppled.

The inspector's report could boost Kerry's contention that Bush rushed to war based on faulty intelligence and that United Nations sanctions and U.N. weapons inspectors should have been given more time.

The report avoids direct comparisons with prewar claims by the Bush administration on Iraq's weapons systems. But Duelfer largely reinforces the conclusions of his predecessor, David Kay, who said in January, "We were almost all wrong" on Saddam's weapons programs. The White House did not endorse Kay's findings then, noting Duelfer's team was still searching for weapons.

Duelfer found that Saddam, hoping to end U.N. sanctions, gradually began ending prohibited weapons programs starting in 1991. But as Iraq started receiving money through the U.N. oil-for-food program in the late 1990s, and as enforcement of the sanctions weakened, Saddam was able to take steps to rebuild his military, such as acquiring parts for missile systems.

However, the erosion of sanctions stopped after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Duelfer found, preventing Saddam from pursuing weapons of mass destruction.

Joe, I explained where the WMD went to. There were more than two officials that explained he shipped WMD evidence to Syria.; Did we search Syria? NO.

Had you watched General DeLongs video, you would understand what our mistakes were. But they weren't deliberate mistakes.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JoeB131]

Joe, I explained where the WMD went to. There were more than two officials that explained he shipped WMD evidence to Syria.; Did we search Syria? NO.

Had you watched General DeLongs video, you would understand what our mistakes were. But they weren't deliberate mistakes.

Yes, we've heard the bullshit excuses. That in a fight for his life, instead of using WMD's, Saddam smuggled them all off to Syria to give them to Bashir Assad, who was hardly his friend.

Why, that sounds perfectly plausible, if you are clinically retarded.

 

[Robert W]

Yes, we've heard the bullshit excuses. That in a fight for his life, instead of using WMD's, Saddam smuggled them all off to Syria to give them to Bashir Assad, who was hardly his friend.

Why, that sounds perfectly plausible, if you are clinically retarded.

You are not calling me the liar, you are calling a decorated 3-star Marine General a liar. And also, you called a liar the 4-star Iraqi General who confirmed it.

 

[Stryder50]

Mohammedanism is a 'race'? LOL

No, it is violent political system that has masqueraded as a religion for over 1000 years.

More like @1400 years.
Since @632 AD

 

[Robert W]

Contradicting the main argument for a war that has cost more than 1,000 American lives

That was Colin Powell's assessment, not Bushs.

Bush was more reserved. He told us Saddam is a grave gathering danger.

And Powell was right. Saddam did have them when Powell said he did. Saddam wanting to keep them, simply moved them a few miles across the Syrian border. So says a 4-star Iraq General who was inside of this.

 

[Stryder50]

I'll believe the experts on such things, not a couple of generals trying to save face for a criminal president.

No WMD in Iraq

Contradicting the main argument for a war that has cost more than 1,000 American lives, the top U.S. arms inspector said Wednesday he found no evidence that Iraq (news - web sites) produced any weapons of mass destruction after 1991. He also concluded that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s capabilities to develop such weapon had dimmed — not grown — during a dozen years of sanctions before last year's U.S. invasion.

Contrary to prewar statements by President Bush and top administration officials, Saddam did not have chemical and biological stockpiles when the war began and his nuclear capabilities were deteriorating, not advancing, said Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group.

The findings come less than four weeks before an election in which Bush's handling of Iraq has become the central issue. Democratic candidate John Kerry has seized on comments by the former U.S. administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, that the United States did not have enough troops in Iraq to prevent lawlessness after Saddam was toppled.

The inspector's report could boost Kerry's contention that Bush rushed to war based on faulty intelligence and that United Nations sanctions and U.N. weapons inspectors should have been given more time.

The report avoids direct comparisons with prewar claims by the Bush administration on Iraq's weapons systems. But Duelfer largely reinforces the conclusions of his predecessor, David Kay, who said in January, "We were almost all wrong" on Saddam's weapons programs. The White House did not endorse Kay's findings then, noting Duelfer's team was still searching for weapons.

Duelfer found that Saddam, hoping to end U.N. sanctions, gradually began ending prohibited weapons programs starting in 1991. But as Iraq started receiving money through the U.N. oil-for-food program in the late 1990s, and as enforcement of the sanctions weakened, Saddam was able to take steps to rebuild his military, such as acquiring parts for missile systems.

However, the erosion of sanctions stopped after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Duelfer found, preventing Saddam from pursuing weapons of mass destruction.

Didn't come from what could be seen as an objective source. Nor one free of pravda and taqiyya.

Islamic World

 

[GLASNOST]

We all have been hammered by JoeB131 about his views of Christians.

OK.

What will he say about Muslims?

Does he express his views about Muslims fairly?

Oh hell, I now saw post 12 where he worships them. He even defended Sadaam Hussein.

What JoeB131 said about Saddam Hussein in post #12 is true and Saddam Hussein didn't have any Weapons of Mass Destruction. There - I said it. Does that bother you?