What is the world supposed to do with the Iranian regime, or what were they supposed to do with them?

[Deadstick]

The US spends more on arms than other countries put together, because so called defence spending is a racket that has nothing to do with defence, all those missiles they have fired at Iran costing millions will have to be replaced, it's a pyramid selling scam and that is why they start wars$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

[AZrailwhale]

If you are going to post something and have a point to make you don't have to exaggerate to make it.

We refused to return the Shah also.

So? France refused to turn Khomeini over to the Shah. Did that give the Shah's government the right to wage low-grade warfare against France?

 

[JoeB131]

So? France refused to turn Khomeini over to the Shah. Did that give the Shah's government the right to wage low-grade warfare against France?

Khomeini at that point hadn't murdered thousands of Iranians like the Shah did.

Nor did France put him in charge after he had been voted out, like we did with the Shah.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Khomeini at that point hadn't murdered thousands of Iranians like the Shah did.

Nor did France put him in charge after he had been voted out, like we did with the Shah.

No but he was a wanted man in Iran and the Shah didn't murder thousands of Iranians.

Khomeini at that point hadn't murdered thousands of Iranians like the Shah did.

Nor did France put him in charge after he had been voted out, like we did with the Shah.

In twenty-six years, the Shah's government killed fewer than 3,000 Iranian citizens at worst. In the last year alone, the Mullahs have killed over thirty thousand. I know which government are the murderers even if you are too stupid to. From Human Rights in Iran: The Rise and fall of the Shah's Regime:
"

Postmortem: Reevaluating the Shah’s Human Rights Record​

Historians have since reexamined the Shah’s human rights record, finding that some of the figures related to casualties during his reign may have been exaggerated. For example, the number of demonstrators killed during the June 1963 protests was around 380 rather than the previously claimed 15,000. Furthermore, the death toll during the 1977–1979 period of the Iranian Revolution was found to be much lower than the 60,000 initially reported, with more recent estimates ranging between 532 and 2,781.

The number of deaths during the Black Friday massacre at Jaleh Square has also been revised, with new research suggesting that 84 people were killed by Iranian troops, rather than the thousands initially reported. Such revisions have led to a more nuanced understanding of the Shah’s human rights record."

 

[JoeB131]

In twenty-six years, the Shah's government killed fewer than 3,000 Iranian citizens at worst. In the last year alone, the Mullahs have killed over thirty thousand. I know which government are the murderers even if you are too stupid to. From Human Rights in Iran: The Rise and fall of the Shah's Regime:

Wow, more white people telling those third-worlders what's what.

The Shah was a bastard. The reason why the Ayatollahs took over is that, quite literally, anyone else who could have made up a peaceful opposition was broken in a SAVAK prison cell.

The Shah was a true bastard, and frankly, we should have turned him over when the Iranians asked for him.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Wow, more white people telling those third-worlders what's what.

The Shah was a bastard. The reason why the Ayatollahs took over is that, quite literally, anyone else who could have made up a peaceful opposition was broken in a SAVAK prison cell.

The Shah was a true bastard, and frankly, we should have turned him over when the Iranians asked for him.

Every Middle Eastern ruler is a bastard. That is what it takes to rule Muslims who only respect naked force.

 

[JoeB131]

Every Middle Eastern ruler is a bastard. That is what it takes to rule Muslims who only respect naked force.

Nice bringing out your racism again. That never gets old.

So it's okay when our allies brutalize their people, but not when the Ayatollahs do it, because they say mean things about us.

Got it.

 

[Stryder50]

Nice bringing out your racism again. That never gets old.

So it's okay when our allies brutalize their people, but not when the Ayatollahs do it, because they say mean things about us.

Got it.

Islam is a religion with followers from all races and ethnics.
Criticizing Islam is NOT racism ~ since it includes all types.
Unless one is a lying disinformationist Left-wing nut job like you.
BTW, the bulk of the peoples of the Middle East are variations of Caucasian. Very few are of African or Asian genetics.

 

[JoeB131]

Islam is a religion with followers from all races and ethnics.
Criticizing Islam is NOT racism ~ since it includes all types.
Unless one is a lying disinformationist Left-wing nut job like you.
BTW, the bulk of the peoples of the Middle East are variations of Caucasian. Very few are of African or Asian genetics.

But they aren't the right kind of Caucasian, are they? (Not that "Caucasian" is a legitimate racial category at this point.)

Here's why Middle Easterners are considered "Caucasian" Because at the turn of the 19th century, and Arab was suing the government claiming to be white, and his lawyers hit on the brilliant claim that because Jesus was from the Middle East, and Jesus was white, Middle-easterners must be "white enough"

 

[Kruska]

So? France refused to turn Khomeini over to the Shah. Did that give the Shah's government the right to wage low-grade warfare against France?

The Shah "obviously" wasn't bothered about Khomeini - who only returned upon the Shah and his US$billions made a run for it.

 

[Stryder50]

But they aren't the right kind of Caucasian, are they? (Not that "Caucasian" is a legitimate racial category at this point.)

Here's why Middle Easterners are considered "Caucasian" Because at the turn of the 19th century, and Arab was suing the government claiming to be white, and his lawyers hit on the brilliant claim that because Jesus was from the Middle East, and Jesus was white, Middle-easterners must be "white enough"

Has to do with biological divisions of humanity into three "racial" types base mostly on genetics.
Peddle whatever Racist, Leftist, Pravda and disinformation you want Komrade 'Joe', but you are in error and being deceptive, and dishonest from objective standards of assessment.

 

[Stryder50]

The US spends more on arms than other countries put together, because so called defence spending is a racket that has nothing to do with defence, all those missiles they have fired at Iran costing millions will have to be replaced, it's a pyramid selling scam and that is why they start wars$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Not quite liar.
Following shows top 14 others after the USA spending nearly 50% more collectively, and this doesn't count the other 100+ nations on this planet.
Also doesn't reflect that portion of the USA military budget that is in post service benefits such as GI funding of college, trade school, home ownership and some post service medical aid.

Military spending

Includes military and civil personnel, operation and maintenance, procurement, military research and development, infrastructure, and aid. This data is expressed in US dollars and adjusted for inflation.

ourworldindata.org

BTW, you remain a clueless socialist(freeloader) stooge and puppet mouthpiece (and idiot).

 

[MarathonMike]

Arm the Iranian people. Crush the IRGC. The Iranian Regime Leaders will flee to Moscow and Beijing.

 

[JoeB131]

Has to do with biological divisions of humanity into three "racial" types base mostly on genetics.
Peddle whatever Racist, Leftist, Pravda and disinformation you want Komrade 'Joe', but you are in error and being deceptive, and dishonest from objective standards of assessment.

Not really. You guys don't consider middle easterners to be white, that's the thing. They're a bunch of brown people with a scary religion.

 

[JoeB131]

Arm the Iranian people. Crush the IRGC. The Iranian Regime Leaders will flee to Moscow and Beijing.

Yeah, didn't we try that in Syria and Libya. How did that work out for us again?

 

[Stryder50]

Yeah, didn't we try that in Syria and Libya. How did that work out for us again?

More important is how did it work out for those in Syria and Libya.

 

[Stryder50]

Not really. You guys don't consider middle easterners to be white, that's the thing. They're a bunch of brown people with a scary religion.

Bullshyte, Komrade Joe!
This poster is and has family of varied shades of "brown people" and finds your broad brush inaccurate categorization offensive.

Not all religions are equal. An intelligent and objective examination of their dogmas will show such. You appear to lack that ability of discernment.

 

[Stryder50]

Your timeline is a little off. You should start with 1953 when the newly formed CIA and the brits overthrew the government there and installed our puppet and he created the secret police there.

EXCERPT:
...
In 1951, under Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, the Iranian parliament voted to nationalize the British-owned oil industry, leading to the Abadan Crisis. Despite British pressure, including an economic blockade, nationalization continued. Mosaddegh was removed from power in 1952 but was quickly re-appointed by the Shah, due to a popular uprising in support of the premier. He forced the Shah into a brief exile in August 1953 after a failed military coup by Imperial Guard Colonel Nematollah Nassiri.

On 19 August, a successful coup was headed by retired army general Fazlollah Zahedi, aided by the US (CIA) and the British (MI6), known as Operation Ajax and Operation Boot to the respective agencies.The coup—with a black propaganda campaign against Mosaddegh—forced Mosaddegh from office. Mosaddegh was arrested and tried for treason. Found guilty, Mosaddegh had his sentence reduced to house arrest on his family estate while his foreign minister, Hossein Fatemi, was executed. Zahedi succeeded him as prime minister and suppressed opposition to the Shah, specifically from the National Front and the communist Tudeh Party.

From that time until the revolution, Iran was ruled as an autocracy under the Shah, with strong American support. Iran initiated economic, social, agrarian, and administrative reforms to modernize the country, which became known as the White Revolution. Many Islamic leaders criticized these initiatives, and the land reform had mixed results. By 1978, the Shah had become wildly unpopular among the Iranian people. Daily demonstrations destabilized the region, and the Shah established martial law to curb opposition. When hundreds of thousands of protestors persisted, security forces opened fire on the crowds in an incident that became known as Black Friday
....

Iran - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Stryder50]

For general reference and a start point, the Wiki on Iran;

Iran - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Recent list of articles from the Middle East Forum;

https://middle-east-forum.read.axioshq.com/p/mef-dispatch/9d83bced-238a-4ded-b005-201782ca1751?utm_location=email_view_in_browser

And the MEF webpage;

Middle East Forum – Analysis, Reports & News | MEF - Middle East Forum

The Middle East Forum provides in‑depth analysis, reports, and news on Middle Eastern politics, security, and culture.

www.meforum.org

MEF is the most informative and object site I've found so far on Middle East subjects.

 

[Deadstick]

Arm the Iranian people. Crush the IRGC. The Iranian Regime Leaders will flee to Moscow and Beijing.

Well that's your usual style support terrorism, bad news for you is it won't work with Iran they are onto you and they have shown they are capable of confronting your terrorism.