What is the world supposed to do with the Iranian regime, or what were they supposed to do with them?

[Zavulon]

You’d probably have ignored it anyway

I don't like video lectures, they are usually slow and boring. I prefer to read, rather than watch and listen. But if there is something useful and you can explain why I should watch it - may be, I'll search how to do it.

 

[Ringo]

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Who’s telling you that?

Everyone.

Blanche: Epstein files 'should not be a part of anything ...​

The Hill
https://thehill.com › policy › national-security › 58146...




21 hours ago — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces criticism for seeking to distance himself from the Jeffrey Epstein files, claiming they should not be a part of anything going forward.


The Justice Department has not released all the Epstein files. The DOJ initially said there were roughly 6 million pages of records in the files, but it has released about 3 million. The department said it has withheld duplicates, as well as other records.

 

[Ringo]

 

[j-mac]

I don't like video lectures, they are usually slow and boring. I prefer to read, rather than watch and listen. But if there is something useful and you can explain why I should watch it - may be, I'll search how to do it.

Nah, just keep your fingers in your ears and pretend you won something

 

[j-mac]

Everyone.

Blanche: Epstein files 'should not be a part of anything ...​

View attachment 1239258
The Hill
https://thehill.com › policy › national-security › 58146...




21 hours ago — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces criticism for seeking to distance himself from the Jeffrey Epstein files, claiming they should not be a part of anything going forward.


The Justice Department has not released all the Epstein files. The DOJ initially said there were roughly 6 million pages of records in the files, but it has released about 3 million. The department said it has withheld duplicates, as well as other records.

 

[JoeB131]

None of the people Trump deported were US citizens.

That difference does not phase you in the least, does it?

Actually, Trump has arrested hundreds of US Citizens.. but don't let that stop you.

For you see, one act is uncontitutional and racist, and the other is simply enforcing the Federal laws on the books regarding immigration, laws that Congress has refused to change, even when the DNC was in power.

Nope. Trump is arresting people who have legal status or have a legitimate claim to residency through the asylum process.

As for the economy, the response to Covid is what caused the worldwide inflation, something none of the governments that caused it will own up to. Trump's biggest mistake was trusting the "experts" like Fauci, but most of the damage was done under the Biden administration. In fact, most people died under the Biden administration, even with your precious vaccine.

YOu mean people kept dying after Trump let the whole country get infected? Damn them!!

Not to mention Trump botched the initial vaccine rollout, losing months.

But let's talk about inflation. Both Trump and Biden did what was necessary to jump start the economy- pump billions into it.

But in your fantasy world, only Biden's stimulus caused inflation (which was actually a global phenomenon)

A simpleton like you just doesn't understand science or economics.

 

[Dragonlady]

Year and a half?

Is that really your only retort?

That proves it, this post was full of lies so ignore it all and then cancel me while you are at it!!!

Your post is full of lies. You've blamed every attack on US interests/troops since 1979 on the Iranians without differentiating between attacks from Al Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups in the region.

You never even mentioned Saudi backed terrorism or their role in sheltering Al Qaeda or Bin Laden.

 

[Hafar1014]

Iraq never did a thing to us. You are just incredibly gullible.

Neither did the NAZIs but we see the need to rid the world of evil and we respond. Democrats appease evil . The left loved Stalin and Hitler and defend Iran and Islamic terror. Nothing has changed

 

[pknopp]

Neither did the NAZIs but we see the need to rid the world of evil and we respond. Democrats appease evil . The left loved Stalin and Hitler and defend Iran and Islamic terror. Nothing has changed

The Taliban sends their regards. The leadership of Iran will not change.

 

[JoeB131]

Neither did the NAZIs but we see the need to rid the world of evil and we respond. Democrats appease evil . The left loved Stalin and Hitler and defend Iran and Islamic terror. Nothing has changed

It was the left that pushed to get rid of Hitler while the right didn't want to get involved in WWII all the way up until Pearl Harbor.

If the Japanese didn't bomb Pearl Harbor, we'd have stayed out of Europe's war.

 

[Hafar1014]

It was the left that pushed to get rid of Hitler while the right didn't want to get involved in WWII all the way up until Pearl Harbor.

If the Japanese didn't bomb Pearl Harbor, we'd have stayed out of Europe's war.

The left loved Hitler and Stalin.
Charles Lindberg was a big Hitler supporter
The real Lindbergh, were he president, might indeed have coerced Jewish “Americanization,” given his admiration for Hitler, his equation of Jews with communism, and his belief that only the harsh medicine of fascist dictatorship could save “the white race” and Western civilization.

In September 1941, as spokesman for the anti-war America First movement, Lindbergh gave a speech in Des Moines, Iowa blaming the British, the Roosevelt administration, and Jewish masterminds of the media and movies for America’s drift toward war.

But Roth’s depiction of Lindbergh as a Hitler apologist and antisemite omits an important influence: his commitment to eugenics, which was clearly impacted by his years experimenting in a basement lab of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York.

In 1930, Lindbergh had met Alexis Carrel, a vascular surgeon from France, and a Nobel Prize winner for medicine. Carrel became a father figure, consoling Lindbergh after the kidnap-murder of his infant son.

The left loves socialism and communism and still do today as the democrat party

 

[JoeB131]

The left loved Hitler and Stalin.
Charles Lindberg was a big Hitler supporter
The real Lindbergh, were he president, might indeed have coerced Jewish “Americanization,” given his admiration for Hitler, his equation of Jews with communism, and his belief that only the harsh medicine of fascist dictatorship could save “the white race” and Western civilization.

I think you are a tad confused. Nazism is a right-wing/conservative philosophy, not a left-wing one.

As far as associating communism with Jews... um, that's a no-brainer. Marx was a Jew. Engels was a Jew. Trotsky was a Jew. The Commie revolutionaries who toppled the Kaiser and brought about the Weimar Shit-Show were Jews.

In September 1941, as spokesman for the anti-war America First movement, Lindbergh gave a speech in Des Moines, Iowa blaming the British, the Roosevelt administration, and Jewish masterminds of the media and movies for America’s drift toward war.

And he wasn't wrong.

 

[Hafar1014]

I think you are a tad confused. Nazism is a right-wing/conservative philosophy, not a left-wing one.

As far as associating communism with Jews... um, that's a no-brainer. Marx was a Jew. Engels was a Jew. Trotsky was a Jew. The Commie revolutionaries who toppled the Kaiser and brought about the Weimar Shit-Show were Jews.


And he wasn't wrong.

The NAZIs were ardent socialist its an acronym The Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers' Party
Jews as whole start their own businesses thats capitalism. I started 5

Russia under the Czar banned Judaism.
NAZIs have many of the same policies todays progressives believe in and they hate Jews too. Its the fascist left that claims its right wing because thats who they are.

1. Obsession with Race​

Adolf Hitler, as we are well aware, was obsessed with the supposed superiority of the ‘Aryan Race’. In his bid to ‘secure the future’ of the ‘Aryan Race’, he committed the genocide of Jews in Germany. Similarly, liberals in the West are obsessed with race too. In fact, they are so obsessed that a strong candidate for the Democrat nominee for US Presidential elections in 2020 lied about her race and claimed that she is Native American despite the fact she is not in order to gain political benefits.

Furthermore, prominent liberals in the US can be regularly found to be engaged in anti-White rhetoric where they can be seen cheering for ‘White Genocide’, all the while denying that such a thing exists. In India, liberals are obsessed with the Aryan-Dravidian race theory despite the fact that it has been regularly debunked by scholars and academics. But that hasn’t stopped Indian liberals from continuing to further the race theory. The obsession that liberals have with race is very similar to that shared by Nazi Germany.


In India, the rhetoric that liberals employ against Brahmins is akin to the one employed by Nazi Germany against Jews. In mainstream Dravidian politics, which is cheered on and encouraged and sustained by liberalism, the propaganda against Brahmins are is completely alike that fueled by Nazis against Jews.

2. Ideological Unity between the Media and Political Parties​

In Nazi Germany, the media served as the propaganda wing of the fascist government. We see a similar pattern in the liberal world. The media was an extended arm of the Nazis. In the USA, we see the mainstream media act as the propaganda wing of the Democrat party. The collusion that was observed between news networks and Hillary Clinton was for all to see. The liberal American media has even justified violence by Antifa goons against their political opponents.

In India, we see the mainstream media serve as the propaganda wing of the ‘Secular’ parties. There is extreme collusion between the political establishment and the media. The Liberal media demonizes the opponents of secular political parties and their supporters, exaggerates minor events in order to benefit secular politicians and whitewashes and buries news that could adversely impact secular parties. It’s an incestuous relationship between Liberal Media and Liberal political parties and they work together in the same fashion as the media and politicians in Nazi Germany.

However, there is one distinct difference between the media-politics nexus in the world of liberalism and Nazism. In Nazi Germany, no efforts were made to hide the relationship. But liberalism, in order to be more effective, claims to be ‘independent’ and ‘neutral’ even when they are clearly not and buries the incestuous relationship under layers and layers of carefully constructed diversions.


The relationship between the Media and politicians in Nazi Germany and in the Liberal World stems from the ideological unity between them, the material benefits that are gained are only a second-order requirement. Loyalty to ideology is the main motivation.

3. Ideological Unity between Academia and Political Parties​

In Nazi Germany, the Academia served the Nazis greatly and even helped shape their ideology and provided them with ideas and techniques to help them achieve their nefarious objectives. We see a similar pattern in the liberal world. The political parties rely on academia for acquiring footsoldiers and legitimizing their evil agenda while the latter relies on the former for patronage.


The Academia also provides Liberal politicians with footsoldiers and innovative techniques in order for them to achieve their political goals. Here, again, we see a complete unity of ideology between the Academia and Liberal political parties. It is the same in the US as it is in India. The liberal parties work in tandem in order to indoctrinate the youth and achieve ideological objectives.

4. The Will to Power and Crushing Dissent​

In Nazi Germany, there was complete coherence of ideology between the political establishment, the Media and Academia. A similar pattern is also observed in the world of Liberalism. The three departments, together, with complete ideological unity between them, form the Liberal Establishment in the 21st century. The arms of the Liberal Establishment then work in tandem, like Nazi Germany, to crush dissent and entrench itself in the corridors of power.

The Liberal Establishment crushes dissent, demonizes its opponent unfairly and unceremoniously removes them from power all the while accusing their political opponent of being fascists, despite the fact that it is the structure of their politics that is completely akin to Nazi Germany. No stones are left unturned in order to secure their power. In India, the Liberal Establishment has also engaged in the genocide of Hindus and Sikhs, in Kashmir and in 1984 respectively.

The three arms of the Liberal Establishment attack and defend together. Whenever the power of one arm is under threat, the other arms immediately comes to their defense. For instance, when there is a threat to its political power, the academia and the media immediately rushes to their defense in order to defeat its political opponents. When political rivals attempt to remove stranglehold of liberals in academia, political parties and the media rushes to its defense. When the monopoly of liberals over media is threatened, the academia and political parties rush to provide cover. And together, they fight to ensure that the Liberal Establishment continues to thrive.

Simultaneously, the opponents of the Liberal Establishment are crushed by the three arms together and it’s ensured that opposing ideologies never get a foothold in these institutions. If someone or some entity succeeds in gaining legitimacy in these three arms, then they demonized and every effort is made to tarnish their reputation and destroy their lives. In many instances, people actually lose their lives and their death is brushed under the carpet as an insignificant statistic. And on and on it goes.

5. A Totalitarian Society​

The most distinguishing feature of a totalitarian society or a totalitarian ideology is that the power structure isn’t merely interested in what an individual says or how he acts but also how people think. It is not enough to merely say or act in a certain way, a person must also believe the ideology completely. Otherwise, the person can be accused of a ‘thoughtcrime’ and persecuted accordingly.

In George Orwell’s 1984, ‘thoughtcrime’ describes a person’s politically unorthodox thoughts, such as unspoken beliefs and doubts that contradict the dominant political ideology. We see a similar pattern playing out in the liberal world. Merely accusations and allegations combined with certain ‘suspicious’ behaviour is enough reason to completely destroy an individual’s life.

For instance, a person does not have to be a ‘homophobe’ or ‘misogynist’ in order to have his life completely destroyed and ruined, mere accusations are enough. Furthermore, anyone who does not endorse the most extreme positions of the Liberal world is branded ‘homophobe’, ‘misogynist’, ‘regressive’ or whatever the latest buzzword maybe and then it is demanded that his professional career be destroyed.

Mere differences in political opinions are treated as thoughtcrimes and efforts are undertaken to crush the individual. Everyone who disagrees with a liberal is Sanghi and fascist against whom even violence is justified. ‘Jai Shri Ram’ slogans and chants of ‘Vande Mataram’ are deemed as provocations.

Conclusion​

While it is fancy, these days, for people to accuse the political opponents of Liberalism as ‘fascists’, in reality, Liberalism and Nazism are cousins and the fight between them is one of sibling rivalry. The reason why liberals paint all their political opponents from diverse political backgrounds as ‘fascist’ is that ‘fascism’ is the ideology they are most well acquainted with and intimate with.

 

[JoeB131]

The NAZIs were ardent socialist its an acronym The Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers' Party
Jews as whole start their own businesses thats capitalism. I started 5

Okay, some historical context here. Calling themselves "Socialst" was a marketing ploy, because most of the German political parties at the time called themselves either "Nationalist" or "Socialist". Hitler himself hated the name change.

Russia under the Czar banned Judaism.

The Tsar wasn't communist.

NAZIs have many of the same policies todays progressives believe in and they hate Jews too. Its the fascist left that claims its right wing because thats who they are.

Nobody likes the Jews. It's probably your sense of entitlement, no matter where you go. It's not a left-right thing, it's a "Acting like an entitled asshole wherever you go" thing.

 

[Hafar1014]

Okay, some historical context here. Calling themselves "Socialst" was a marketing ploy, because most of the German political parties at the time called themselves either "Nationalist" or "Socialist". Hitler himself hated the name change.




The Tsar wasn't communist.


Nobody likes the Jews. It's probably your sense of entitlement, no matter where you go. It's not a left-right thing, it's a "Acting like an entitled asshole wherever you go" thing.

The Czar was antisemitic Jews were banned by law form practicing and couldnt use Jewish names

Lest examine NAZI policies and see how they compare to progressive socialist idology

NAZI policies;
Free healthcare
Guaranteed jobs
Confiscated inherited wealth (Warrens wealth tax bill and CA wealth tax)
Spent vast summs on public education
Purged the church from public policy ( didnt the FBI investrigate the Catholic Church and Don Lemons attack on a church)
Inserted the state into every aspect of pesronal life
Supported abortion and euthenasia
Gun control
NAZIs hated the free market (Hows the communist mayor of NTY doing)
Provided generous pensions for the elderly
Had a strict racial quota system for the universities (We call it DEI)
Had speech codes in the universities (Political correctness)
They were organic farmers
Hitler was vegetarians and Himmler an animal rights activist
Antismitism

This could be the platform for the democrat party
Source Liberal Fascism by Jonah Golderg

 

[Dorian Mode]

STFU. This has been coming since 1979. "Oh! They only held them hostage for 444 days". Gah! Bust yourself right in the mouth for me, dumbass!

Thank you for laying out why this is happening to people that don't know.
Every president since Ford should have done what Trump is doing.
That's the truth of the matter.

People like to think Trump woke up one morning and just decided to go take out Maduro, go to war with Iran, and then later get control of Cuba. They have no idea that there is the US Dept. Of State, the CIA and the Pentagon that have been working on this for many decades. They decided now was the time and Trump knows better than to piss them off again after what happened to him with Ukraine. It's just fortunate for the dumocraps that a republican is POTUS now to get all the slack, but it could just as easily have been Harris.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You can discuss both. The Shah was a horror to the people. The people overthrew him. The people, not some outside force. The peopleThey understandably blame outside entities for keeping him in power as long as he was and protecting him. Carters biggest mistake was in not returning him to Iran.

.

I met quite a few Persians, all of whom loved the Shah and despised the mullahs and ayatollahs.





.

 

[pknopp]

.

I met quite a few Persians, all of whom loved the Shah and despised the mullahs and ayatollahs.





.

well dang, there you go......you know a couple people. That settles it.

 

[JoeB131]

The Czar was antisemitic Jews were banned by law form practicing and couldnt use Jewish names

Lest examine NAZI policies and see how they compare to progressive socialist idology

NAZI policies;
Free healthcare

If you weren't such an ignorant mope, you'd know that Germany had universal health care going back to Bismarck.

Confiscated inherited wealth (Warrens wealth tax bill and CA wealth tax)

Not really true. The big money interests like the Krupps kept their vast wealth.

Spent vast summs on public education

All civilized nations do that.

Purged the church from public policy ( didnt the FBI investrigate the Catholic Church and Don Lemons attack on a church)

Not really true, the Catholic Church was completely on board with the Nazis after the Vatican Agreement.

Gun control

Nope. The Nazis actually repealed the Weimar Gun laws, which made it easier for Germans (but not Jews) to get guns.

Provided generous pensions for the elderly

Again, that was something that went back to Bismarck.

Had a strict racial quota system for the universities (We call it DEI)

Given Germany was 98% German, not sure how that worked, exactly.

They were organic farmers
Hitler was vegetarians and Himmler an animal rights activist

Wow that sounds like an argument a middle-schooler who doesn't want to eat his vegetables would make.

Hitler's vegetarianism actually did have an effect in that the man suffered from terrible flatulance, but no one wanted to say anything because it was Hitler!