9/11 and the Rise of the New Conspiracy Theorists

[the other mike]

This is great. After seeing the opening bullshit narrative of the article, I decided not to read it, but will post it here for anyone else with nothing to do today.

The persistence of the fringe movement that blames the U.S. government for the 2001 terrorist attacks suggests that QAnon and other digital-age conspiracists may be around for a while

9/11 and the Rise of the New Conspiracy Theorists

The persistence of the fringe movement that blames the U.S. government for the 2001 terrorist attacks suggests that QAnon and other digital-age conspiracists may be around for a while.

www.wsj.com

 

[the other mike]

The whole premise of the article is a slap in the face of all Americans,
whether they're smart enough to realize it or not.

 

[the other mike]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.

 

[the other mike]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.

You know the easiest way to know ? Ask any random stranger - I don't care who or where- ask them one simple question. "Did you know a third tower collapsed on 9/11 ?" And I can almost guarantee that 9 out of 10 will say no.

The ONLY person I've ever heard even mention the Solomon Brothers building collapse on national TV is Jesse Ventura several years ago.

The only time it was actually reported on was BY MISTAKE, 30 minutes before it even happened .

 

[candycorn]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

No. More correctly, nobody gives a shit about 9/11 truthers because you guys have nothing to say.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Please feel free to post your competing narrative to the 9/11 Commission Report. Same challenge I've made for years. Nobody has ever provided a counter-narrative.

 

[candycorn]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

No. More correctly, nobody gives a shit about 9/11 truthers because you guys have nothing to say.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Please feel free to post your competing narrative to the 9/11 Commission Report. Same challenge I've made for years. Nobody has ever provided a counter-narrative.

Just as I thought.... You've got nothing.

 

[the other mike]

I don't respond to disinformation agents, especially not low-level trolls like you.

 

[candycorn]

I don't respond to disinformation agents, especially not low-level trolls like you.

You're blaming Americans for not listening to you.
Yet you have nothing to say.

You're an idiot.

 

[the other mike]

^Ouch^.
Another anonymous troll insult.
How will I ever overcome the pain ?

World Trade Center 7 building did not collapse due to fire: Report - Daily Commercial News

A group of engineers and architects is demanding the American National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) retract and correct a 2008 report that concluded one of three World Trade Center buildings collapsed because fire weakened the steel suppor

canada.constructconnect.com

 

[the other mike]

 

[Real with True]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

 

[the other mike]

 

[candycorn]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

 

[the other mike]

Did candycorn learn a new word today ?
Conspiracy theory is two though.

 

[the other mike]

 

[the other mike]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

 

[22lcidw]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

The collapse is called "pancaking". But 110 floors! Almost like a controlled demolition you see by professionals.

 

[the other mike]

The collapse is called "pancaking". But 110 floors! Almost like a controlled demolition you see by professionals.

You see the molten steel along the edges ?
This doesn't occur from cutting torches.

At 7:40 you can see that there were 24 of these columns stacked, essentially creating solid columns from the ground up, all around the elevator shafts of each tower.

 

[candycorn]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

The collapse is called "pancaking". But 110 floors! Almost like a controlled demolition you see by professionals.

At no point did all 110 floors collapse.