9/11 and the Rise of the New Conspiracy Theorists

[LA RAM FAN]

low level Langlet shill candyass as always,gets a major ass beating and because of that,is whing to his boos at langley for a riase to put up with the ass beatings. COMEDY GOLD.

 

[badbob85037]

This is great. After seeing the opening bullshit narrative of the article, I decided not to read it, but will post it here for anyone else with nothing to do today.

The persistence of the fringe movement that blames the U.S. government for the 2001 terrorist attacks suggests that QAnon and other digital-age conspiracists may be around for a while

9/11 and the Rise of the New Conspiracy Theorists

The persistence of the fringe movement that blames the U.S. government for the 2001 terrorist attacks suggests that QAnon and other digital-age conspiracists may be around for a while.

www.wsj.com

The day the laws of science and nature took a day off. It's not a conspiracy I worked 10 years with my uncle inn demolition. When I watched the first tower fall I said the same thing I am saying now, controlled demolition. i mean come on!


In 2001 it was impossible to make a cell phone call from 33,000 feet. It was impossible to make a cell phone call from 2,000 feet. It was aldo impossible to fly a 737 through the building coming out the other side unscaved yet the first couple day we saw it over and over again. Never before has a high rise fallen, Even when they burn from top to bottom. Aviation fuel has the same burn as kerosene' Concrete melts at 3,600 to 4,200 degrees . in building 6 there was an armory. All that was left was the concrete that formed around them. 2 months after they were still running into flowing red hot steel and there is only two thing that burn without oxygen, white phosphorus and thermite. Never in history has a plane vanished after crashing to the ground until 9/11. One after hitting 3 light polls disappeared through an 8 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon. The other in a small hole in a field.

And just what the Hell is 'thermal expansion, that occurs at lower temperature and brings down buildings. I still remember when people started coming out public with just what a delusion the whole story was GWB said "You are either with us or against us." There aren't just a couple of reason it couldn't happen as we were told, there were hundreds. Just a couple years age they found bone fragments on a building blocks away from the towers. The buildings fell straight down in their own foot print with no steel beam over 10 foot long. Without any investigation it was packed up and carted off not blown up like the photos show. Conspiracy. What GWB told you is the conspiracy and there is no one that can make me believe anything different. Since that time not one day has gone by we haven't been killing people in some country and the death count is over 2 million.

 

[the other mike]

.....Even when they burn from top to bottom. Aviation fuel has the same burn as kerosene' Concrete melts at 3,600 to 4,200 degrees . in building 6 there was an armory. All that was left was the concrete that formed around them. 2 months after they were still running into flowing red hot steel and there is only two thing that burn without oxygen, white phosphorus and thermite.

There were reports of molten steel over 3 months after into December and January.

 

[badbob85037]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.

If they can get away with 9/11 they can get away with anything no matter how crazy it is.

 

[the other mike]

If they can get away with 9/11 they can get away with anything no matter how crazy it is.

A whole bunch of 'coincidences' on 9/11, like all the FBI evidence on the Enron scandal
being destroyed in Building 7.

 

[the other mike]

The centered collapses meant the falling mass followed the path of maximum resistance. That's the opposite of how we expect a structure to behave when it falls apart in any kind of natural process. Even if the towers were made out of clay, we wouldn't expect them to collapse in such a dead-centered fashion. It's all the more incredible that a steel structure would shred itself by falling into itself instead of falling over.

9-11 Research: Symmetry

911research.wtc7.net

Evidence page

How much do you know? World Trade Center Building 7 was a 47 story skyscraper that was never hit by a plane, yet 'collapsed' on 9/11 after the Twin Towers. Let's examine the evidence...

www1.ae911truth.org

 

[the other mike]

"The accelerated speeds of collapses evident in videos of all three buildings prove that these are not progressive collapses as the government contends. In a progressive collapse a failed structure will encounter resistance--thousands of tons of steel and concrete--and exhibit jolts which will slow down, not accelerate, its decent and will not disintegrate symmetrically into its own footprint. The government's miraculous steel and concrete disintegration theory is fraudulent science. Only in a controlled implosion, using explosives to remove the internal support system, will you get the free-fall speed and vertical decent leaving only a pile of dust and rubble," Smith said.

"The rate of free fall or the gravitational acceleration of Earth is 9.8 meters per second per second, or 9.8/s^2 without air friction coefficients or drag. It is impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near free-fall time of 8.5 to 15 seconds," Smith explained.

In addition to the speed and symmetry of the collapse of WTC 7 and the Twin Towers, many eye witnesses, firefighters, and police officers reported hearing violent explosions from all three building before they fell.

AE911Truth gets positive press in Atlanta Progressive News in advance of our May 21 appearance

Did you know that 3 towers fell on 9/11? World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 after the Twin Towers but was never hit by a plane. How?...

www1.ae911truth.org

 

[the other mike]

 

[north star]

.....Even when they burn from top to bottom. Aviation fuel has the same burn as kerosene' Concrete melts at 3,600 to 4,200 degrees . in building 6 there was an armory. All that was left was the concrete that formed around them. 2 months after they were still running into flowing red hot steel and there is only two thing that burn without oxygen, white phosphorus and thermite.

There were reports of molten steel over 3 months after into December and January.

That's true.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.

There are no facts about 911 being an I side job. You were crushed on that issue years ago.

The government lies often but did not lie about jfk. You were crushed on that years ago

 

[Soupnazi630]

The collapse is called "pancaking". But 110 floors! Almost like a controlled demolition you see by professionals.

You see the molten steel along the edges ?
This doesn't occur from cutting torches.
View attachment 392112

View attachment 392111

At 7:40 you can see that there were 24 of these columns stacked, essentially creating solid columns from the ground up, all around the elevator shafts of each tower.

It does indeed occur from cutting torches.

 

[Soupnazi630]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

False. The impact damage and fire were more than enough to weaken those columns and no evidence of termite exists

 

[Soupnazi630]

I don't respond to disinformation agents, especially not low-level trolls like you.

There are no such agents here. You can respond or not as you please but to use such an excuse is a lie and evidence of intellectual weakness and cowardice

 

[Likkmee]

Looks like the bad guys won.
Nobody gives a shit about the truth anymore.
Americans have become generally just a bunch of pussies.

Yeah the bad guys won again.americans just want to tune into watching football every Sunday and pretend none of the facts about 9/11 being an inside job ever exist. Does it surprise you they don’t care about the truth anymore the fact they stillhave not done anything to get the government to stop lying about the jfk assassination.

If they can get away with 9/11 they can get away with anything no matter how crazy it is.

It sure sold a lot of flags. The economy in Bangladesh soared for 4 months !

 

[Likkmee]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

False. The impact damage and fire were more than enough to weaken those columns and no evidence of termite exists

They should have built the towers out of passports. They came out unscathed

 

[Soupnazi630]

With all the experts that testified to the demolition style of the building collapse and other evidence presented over the years, you cannot deny that the planes were incapable of bringing the structure down. Who is to blame now thats a different story. But, its certain and proven that explosives must have been used to demolish the buildings.

Only thermite charges could have weakened the core columns enough for the towers to collapse straight down the way they did. ( same with tower 7)

False. The impact damage and fire were more than enough to weaken those columns and no evidence of termite exists

They should have built the towers out of passports. They came out unscathed

Only one and it was scathed. Sounds weird but really is not.

 

[the other mike]

They should have built the towers out of passports. They came out unscathed

They rejected my idea - flexible towers.

 

[the other mike]

False. The impact damage and fire were more than enough to weaken those columns and no evidence of termite exists

Yeah. It may have been termites.

 

[the other mike]

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — which is the U.S. government agency that investigated the World Trade Center’s destruction — the Twin Towers came down “essentially in free fall.”

NIST’s theory of the collapses hinges on the idea that the upper section of each tower could continuously accelerate through the lower stories at nearly the rate of gravity, while in the process completely dismembering the steel frames and pulverizing nearly all of the concrete to a fine powder.

Yet NIST provided no modeling or calculations to demonstrate that such behavior was possible. Instead, NIST arbitrarily stopped its analysis at the moment of “collapse initiation,” asserting that total collapse was “inevitable” once the collapses initiated.

Near-Free-Fall Acceleration | Twin Towers

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — which is the U.S. government agency that investigated the World Trade Center’s destruction — the Twin Towers came down “essentially in free fall.” NIST’s theory of the collapses hinges on the idea that the upper section of...

www.ae911truth.org

 

[Soupnazi630]

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — which is the U.S. government agency that investigated the World Trade Center’s destruction — the Twin Towers came down “essentially in free fall.”

NIST’s theory of the collapses hinges on the idea that the upper section of each tower could continuously accelerate through the lower stories at nearly the rate of gravity, while in the process completely dismembering the steel frames and pulverizing nearly all of the concrete to a fine powder.

Yet NIST provided no modeling or calculations to demonstrate that such behavior was possible. Instead, NIST arbitrarily stopped its analysis at the moment of “collapse initiation,” asserting that total collapse was “inevitable” once the collapses initiated.

Near-Free-Fall Acceleration | Twin Towers

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — which is the U.S. government agency that investigated the World Trade Center’s destruction — the Twin Towers came down “essentially in free fall.” NIST’s theory of the collapses hinges on the idea that the upper section of...

www.ae911truth.org

They made so such claim essentially or otherwise.

Like all truther claims the free fall speed claim has been disproven