Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'll type this slowly for you, Pubic. If he brings home so little money that it is akin to welfare and his family lives off his wife's salary then no way is he netting $250,000 or more. Dim, much?
I dont know where you are getting your information. Never mentioned net nor gross. Libs have their talking points, the media repeats them over and over and over again. Thats why everyone knew what I was talking about when I used the term '$250,000.00 threshold' and loosely I might ad.
I tend to align myself with people who think like PuliousInfinite. Thanks.
Nice language. You must have a great career little fella. Absolutely nothing, It was a kind of an introduction. Maybe if i would have used foul language and started by name calling, maybe I would have appeased more of the readers.
A note about Liberals and Conservatives:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas High Tech Lynching.
I tend to align myself with people who think like PuliousInfinite. Thanks.
Nice language. You must have a great career little fella. Absolutely nothing, It was a kind of an introduction. Maybe if i would have used foul language and started by name calling, maybe I would have appeased more of the readers.
A note about Liberals and Conservatives:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas High Tech Lynching.
Chicky, you are high off your ass if you think this is limited to liberals.
A note about Liberals and Conservatives:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas High Tech Lynching.
Chicky, you are high off your ass if you think this is limited to liberals.
That would be Ms. Chicky to you.
OK, since you are not denying the frequently low level of language and response in a number of board posters, please continue down this road and agree that cursing or casting aspersions is the first thing a Liberal does, and this level of discourse, is in the majority, a left wing hallmark. Every onceinawhile, one of us slips.
Chicky, you are high off your ass if you think this is limited to liberals.
All you are doing exposing yourself as a total partisan when you post stuff like this.
You are aware of that, right?
I have to agree with article on this one! For one cons around here are quick to curse also, it isn't limited to one side or the other. And if cursing doesn't work for a con they simply say liberals have no moral values(there is a whole thread about this) and that we are un american.A note about Liberals and Conservatives:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas High Tech Lynching.
Chicky, you are high off your ass if you think this is limited to liberals.
That would be Ms. Chicky to you.
OK, since you are not denying the frequently low level of language and response in a number of board posters, please continue down this road and agree that cursing or casting aspersions is the first thing a Liberal does, and this level of discourse, is in the majority, a left wing hallmark. Every onceinawhile, one of us slips.
So this part of her statement was a lie: However, he brings home less money than a family of 4 on welfare. So we live off of my income as an inside salesperson working for a small business.
The rest of your post is quite frankly the raving of a madman.
No... the lie was in your would-be annotation of finding a distinction between his gross and his net... Or would you like to deny the Left's incessant drive to strip business of the means to deduct their costs from gross receipts?
Would ya like to deny that the left uses Gross revenue as a source to demand that "Corporations don't pay their fair share"?
And you madman quip is little more than a default concession on your part; declaring yourself unable to address the argument, which were it actually insanity, it would be no problem at all for a same individual to enage it and in so doing readily highlight the fatally flawed reasoning.
Now you're a desperate little gal who would KILL to produce a post which could conclusively point out a fatal flaw in my reasoning; thus reason is served that IF YOU COULD DO SO... YOU WOULD!
Thus you concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(ya did the best ya could, Godblessya!
I'll type this slowly for you, Pubic. If he brings home so little money that it is akin to welfare and his family lives off his wife's salary then no way is he netting $250,000 or more. Dim, much?
Sad for you. Next time try harder...don't pretend that profits that are like welfare to you are going to be affected.
You suck at being a troll.
What?
she said you suck at being a troll.
i concur.
wash his smoke?well ms chicky dont give any good smoke to article...he will just wash it...i still cant believe that...washing your damned smoke...i digress
first the op was going on about how she told some min wage clerk...blah blah blah then she is going on about her husband makes, grosses or nets...1/4 milion dollars a year but they live on less that a welfar family....must i point out the obvious here? that is simply either real stupid or real lies....i go for the latter...
wash his smoke?well ms chicky dont give any good smoke to article...he will just wash it...i still cant believe that...washing your damned smoke...i digress
first the op was going on about how she told some min wage clerk...blah blah blah then she is going on about her husband makes, grosses or nets...1/4 milion dollars a year but they live on less that a welfar family....must i point out the obvious here? that is simply either real stupid or real lies....i go for the latter...
And as for the min wage clerk, I hope they had a bowl to smoke when they got home that day!
This was the part of your previous post that I decided made you nothing but a raving madman.No... the lie was in your would-be annotation of finding a distinction between his gross and his net... Or would you like to deny the Left's incessant drive to strip business of the means to deduct their costs from gross receipts?
Would ya like to deny that the left uses Gross revenue as a source to demand that "Corporations don't pay their fair share"?
And you madman quip is little more than a default concession on your part; declaring yourself unable to address the argument, which were it actually insanity, it would be no problem at all for a same individual to enage it and in so doing readily highlight the fatally flawed reasoning.
Now you're a desperate little gal who would KILL to produce a post which could conclusively point out a fatal flaw in my reasoning; thus reason is served that IF YOU COULD DO SO... YOU WOULD!
Thus you concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(ya did the best ya could, Godblessya!
I'll type this slowly for you, Pubic. If he brings home so little money that it is akin to welfare and his family lives off his wife's salary then no way is he netting $250,000 or more. Dim, much?
No shit Captain Obvious... I've only stated that PRECISE FACT, THREE TIMES IN THE LAST THREE POSTS; wherein I have ALSO stated the absurdity of your running to proclaim as MUCH, in that YOU and The Lord of the Idiots are OVERTLY DOING YOUR BEST TO TAX HIM: NOT ON HIS NET... BUT THAT 250k in gross sales.
It's not a major point witless... yet you can't seem to get past it.
AGAIN: DO YOU WANT TO PUBLICLY, DIRECTLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY DENY THAT THE LEFT IS CHRONICALLY TRYING TO CUT 'DEDUCTIONS' WHICH YOU IDIOTS JUST AS CHRONICALLY AND QUITE ERRONEOUSLY CLAIM ARE METHODS BY WHICH BUSINESS AVOIDS PAYING TAXES?
If so, DO SO... and we'll just file that away for five minutes until you're found crying that "CORPORATIONS DON'T PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE and in doing so hold up some corporate filing which shows a trillion dollars in gross sales and taxes paid on $1.50...
I don't care which way ya go jackass... as you're going to get fed to the bear one way or another... so it's little more that 'ketchup or mustard' issue to me...
wash his smoke?well ms chicky dont give any good smoke to article...he will just wash it...i still cant believe that...washing your damned smoke...i digress
first the op was going on about how she told some min wage clerk...blah blah blah then she is going on about her husband makes, grosses or nets...1/4 milion dollars a year but they live on less that a welfar family....must i point out the obvious here? that is simply either real stupid or real lies....i go for the latter...
And as for the min wage clerk, I hope they had a bowl to smoke when they got home that day!
lol ...
I confided in EZ's thread about stupid things you've left in your pants and then washed that I once ruined a bag of weed in the laundry. bones had been beating me over the head about it ever since
PubliusInfinitum still can't provide any links or proof or evidence whatsoever that the government is trying to tax s-corps on gross income and not net income. Surprise surprise.
wash his smoke?
And as for the min wage clerk, I hope they had a bowl to smoke when they got home that day!
lol ...
I confided in EZ's thread about stupid things you've left in your pants and then washed that I once ruined a bag of weed in the laundry. bones had been beating me over the head about it ever since
i am 55 yrs old...i have lost.... in all that time...2 bags...both located with some searching....but never washed....i have lost 4 joints to canoeing....(gave that shit up fast) and one to tossing it out the window by accident...unreasonable driver would not pull over on the free way...i was willing to go back and get it...that is it...i just dont get someone misplacing...or washing their smoke....get your priorities straight boy and get right with god ....
I am a statistic.
Working middle class; my husband owns a small business that falls into the $250,000.00, talking point threshold, so to speak. However, he brings home less money than a family of 4 on welfare. So we live off of my income as an inside salesperson working for a small business.
While running my daily errands, a store clerk asked me today if I would like to donate my money to help a worthy cause. I told them, "No thank you, Obama will help them". I got a reaction.
It sounds cruel and insensitive, but I would like for anyone who reads this to do the same when someone asks you to give them your money. It just might make a difference.
The point I want to make is this. Our dollar goes much farther when the government stays out of our problems. When large charitable organizations become threatened by lack of public funding, then maybe we can end the corruption in our government.
my husband owns a small business that falls into the $250,000.00, talking point threshold,