- Thread starter
- Banned
- #141
Liar. You are lying to this board. You have falsified a ruling by the court by inserting the April 4 date into the judge's decision.
The April 4 Statement of facts does not specify any "other crime" theories. Vague statements that can be considered to be in support of any theory are not sufficient, and the judge said as much in that paragraph I quoted, citing Mackey.
The "other crimes" were specified in a Bill of Particulars, which the Trump attorneys demanded and received sometime around the end of 2023. The judge referred to that supplemental, and called it adequate to satisfy CPL 200.95 in February.
Those "other crimes" that were specified were recited by the judge, and one of them was dismissed. The judge also enjoined the DA from introducing any new theories at the trial.
You have been outed. And stop lying to this board.
The April 4 date is of the statement of facts. You keep repeating shit that is untrue. You are as imbecilic as your inane posts.
carry on