whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,278
- 6,115
- 245
NFBW230209-#7,241 • I support a woman’s freedom to end the development of a brainless human unwanted organism that is part of her body …….
^^
beagle9230211-#7,260 So you are for the unregulated/ignorant/unprotected sexual activity of humans,
NFBW: It could be a highly civilized conversation between “persons” such as we understand ourselves to be, with differing views on “personhood” beagle9 if you could cease dehumanizing me below your perfect Christian ethical ‘personhood at conception’ by dictating to me what “NFBW” is for and what “NFBW” is against.
I support a woman’s freedom of conscience (do you beagle9 ????? ) as long as her behavior does not cause harm, pain, injury or death to any other person. Relative to that, a person to me, as a very and wholly civilized rational theist, is defined as one who has passed the moment when it’s newly unique brain has physically developed while it was a fetus living and being situated inside the womb between conception and birth.
IN UTERO I made myself a BRAIN and only then did I NFBW become a person.
230212^a
What is ‘personhood’? The ethics question that needs a closer look in abortion debates
What is 'personhood'? The ethics question that needs a closer look in abortion debates Published: May 13, 2022 Nancy S. Jecker, University of Washington •••• Debate about abortion is a debate about rights – but whose?
NFBW: Why do you try to force the debate to the ‘value of Christianity being the only “civilized” state of mind’ for “persons” who succeeded in developing his or her functional brain in utero followed by live birth?
Will you answer that beagle9 ????
END2302120944
Last edited: