NFBW230208-
#7,217 •
Fetuses are not recognized as persons by the US constitution. Slaves were considered persons by virtue of being born.
~~
HeyNorm230206-
#7,180 7180
NFBW230208-
#7,217 • No evidence needs to be produced because all fetuses under RvW were in the same situation at 23 weeks gestation. The starting point and subsequent duration are exactly the same for all unwanted fetuses. Their mothers have 23 weeks to abort them.
~~
HeyNorm230206-
#7,180 7180
NFBW230208-
#7,217 •
All fetuses are inside mothers. Under RvW No mother of an unwanted fetus is required by the government to prove the fetus she intends to abort {because it} has not reached a stage of development where it could survive outside the womb
, All unwanted fetuses are treated the same
~~
HeyNorm230402-
#7,113 7113
NFBW230208-
#7,217 • No. I agree with RvW to limit a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy prior to the third trimester. Government protection during the third trimester is not necessary because they are all fetuses that are inside women who intend to deliver them by willfully taking the risk of giving birth
~~
HeyNorm230202-
#7,079 7079 slavery.
NFBW230208-
#7,217 • Throughout the document, slaves are referred to as persons to underscore their humanity. As James Madison remarked during the
constitutional convention, it was “wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men.” •••• The Constitution refers to slaves using three different formulations: “other persons” (
Article I, Section 2, Clause 3), “such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit” (
Article I, Section 9, Clause 1), and a “person held to service or labor in one state, under the laws thereof” (
Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3).
~~
HeyNorm230202-
#7,060 7060
NFBW230208-
#7,217 •
all fetuses are inside mothers. All mothers had the right to privacy until the start of the third trimester..Some mothers keep a developing fetus with the intent of giving birth. Other mothers abort their fetuses when it’s legal . There are no abortions for convenience during the third trimester., Therefore no fetus needs or get’s protection of a right to life. They already have it
~~
HeyNorm230130-
#6,995 6995
~~
HeyNorm230129-
#6,987 6987
~~
HeyNorm230127-
#6,929 6929
~~
HeyNorm230117-
#6,762 6762
NFBW230208-
#7,217 • when a fetus remains inside its mother it is not recognized to possess a separate individual right to life. RvW did not create personhood for a viable fetus during the third trimester.
~~
HeyNorm230119-
#322 0322
~~
HeyNorm230120-
#249 0249
^^
HeyNorm230208-
#7,218 • Poor Biff, still beating this dead horse.
NFBW: Yes I am beating a dead race horse named SpeciousArgument that DNF’d every race it entered
But just for shits giggles
HeyNorm could you post an authoritative constitutional or civil rights scholar or intellectual person from whom you acquired your
similarly situated fetus classes suffering civil rights violations in the womb and any person not endorsing your right-wing MAGA anti/abortion hocus-pocus is a racist with a slave owner mentality. Surely there is at least one expert on such matters but all you have endorsing your absurdity thus far Iare Civilization must love Jesus @beagle and atheist cussed everybodyout
CarsomyrPlusSix who believe in such pure MAGA bullshit.
END2302081127