Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: how about dropping the fuckYoos and spending a little more pixels CarsomyrPlusSix and communicating whatever the hell it is, you’re trying to say?

Read the 10th Amendment and comprehend it, moron, and / or just go sodomize yourself with a rusty halberd.

You quoted me and went on about nonsense that confirmed your lack of reading comprehension. I don’t care about your incomprehensible nonsense tangents. I don’t care about your obsession with surfactant. I don’t care with your nonsensical obsession with human lives only being worthy of protection when others are aware of the victim and their life…

… or your now disproven concept that murder laws are only justified because of the harm done to others when a human is killed, instead of being needed to provide justice for the victim out of respect for their intrinsic, individual human rights.

If a homeless old vagrant with no friends and family is killed in the woods, that is still murder and justice demands we hunt down their killer if possible. No one is aware of the homeless old vagrant, no one’s life or wellbeing is harmed by the random old vagrant they never knew being killed, and that is completely fucking irrelevant to the injustice of them being murdered and their inherent human rights.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Read the 10th Amendment and comprehend it, moron,

NFBW: Why should I re-read the Tenth Amendment. Women have a right to privacy to keep the noses of atheists like you who hate women out of their uteruses. Woman oppression just lost in South Carolina based on privacy - a Red State.

Cplus6221130-#6,034 The Constitution’s silence is explicitly why it is a 10th Amendment matter… as anyone who didn’t flunk civics already knows.

Cplus6221130-#5,991 Roe cited a fictional "right to privacy" and hallucinated that this fictional right had a penumbra, a shadow right, which meant that you can kill your own kid just because, and it was always in the Constitution, just because of course it was.

Cplus6221130-#5,991 This garbage nonsense stands repealed as it should have been.

Cplus6221130-#5,991 Nothing based on this "right to privacy" has any legitimacy whatsoever, and all of it, not just Roe, should be repealed immediately.

South Carolina Supreme Court Strikes Down State Abortion Ban​

The South Carolina ban on abortions after cardiac activity is no more after the latest legal challenge to the state’s 2021 law proved successful.​

JAMES POLLARD

Jan 5, 2023, 11:45 AM ESTi COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — The South Carolina ban on abortions after cardiac activity is no more after the latest legal challenge to the state’s 2021 law proved successful. •••• The state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the restrictions violate the state constitution’s right to privacy.​

END2301051753

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: Why should I re-read the Tenth Amendment.

Because you don’t understand it and think the nation doesn’t need to adhere to it, you useless fucktarded shitstain.

Women have a right to privacy

No. Read the Constitution, idiot.

Or still, preferably, drink a lot of bleach.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW: Big “right to privacy” state Supreme Court decision in the South. and part of the Bible Belt. Justice Kaye Hearn, who was involved in the decision said:

“Most women who are pregnant at six weeks do not want anyone to know, she said, and many women do not want anyone to know if they have had an abortion. •••• “I know you’re not a woman,” she told a lawyer for the state government. “But what could be more personal than that decision?”​

Cplus6221103-#13 CarsomyrPlusSix “Because Congress has no authority in setting the criminal code of the 50 states and abortion is not (and could not be) a “Constitutional right.””
^
^
Pellinore221105-#15 Pellinore That is incorrect. The Supremacy Clause in the Constitution establishes that all federal laws (starting with the Constitution and heading down) apply to the States. A State trying to pass a law that says a federal law does not apply to them is called nullification, and that was resolved in the 1830s. •••• The federal government is not only allowed but expected to pass federal laws defending Constitutional rights against anyone, including State legislatures, trying to abridge them. Congress has been doing this since day one, even protecting unenumerated rights (under the 9th Am.) such as the rights to vote or to privacy. There is no legal reason why they couldn't do the same for bodily autonomy, for example, and prohibit State laws from nullifying it.


NFBW: The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled today 01/05/23 that the ‘six weeks heartbeat abortion restrictions’ violate the state constitution’s right to privacy.

South Carolina's 6-week abortion ban is unconstitutional, state Supreme Court rules

COLUMBIA, S.C. — The South Carolina Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the state’s six-week abortion ban, ruling it violated the state’s constitutional right to privacy. In a 3-2 vote, the state’s high court wrote, in part, “We hold that our state constitutional right to privacy extends to a...

www.rawstory.com

Justice Kaye Hearn, who wrote the opinion issued Thursday, is the only woman, and the second woman to serve on the court.​

South Carolina Constitution Includes Abortion Right, State Supreme Court Rules (Published 2023)

The decision overturns the state’s six-week ban on abortion, a major victory for abortion rights in the South, where the procedure is strictly limited.

www.nytimes.com

Chief Justice Donald Beatty, the second Black justice elected since Reconstruction, joined her in the opinion along with Justice John C. Few. •••• Justice Hearn seemed to indicate some sympathy toward the abortion providers during oral arguments. She noted that the plaintiff’s side of the courtroom was all female and the state’s side was all male. Most women who are pregnant at six weeks do not want anyone to know, she said, and many women do not want anyone to know if they have had an abortion. •••• “I know you’re not a woman,” she told a lawyer for the state government. “But what could be more personal than that decision?”​

NFBW: Why can one state give a woman reproductive freedom based on a right to privacy and another state can restrict
reproductive freedom therefore allow the state to invade a pregnant woman’s privacy

When a woman lives in a state like South Carolina where reproductive freedom exists but has a job opportunity in a white Christian dominated state that bans abortion; why isn’t her freedom of movement and freedom of conscience interfered with if she does not want to live in a state where mostly white and mostly Christian men in state legislatures want pregnant women to submit to their religious beliefs that life and full blown human rights and personhood begins at conception?

END2301052237

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW230104-#6,638 Actual I do. Women who are pregnant provide the human value and human rights for the living organism that is developing inside the womb that she is providing for it.
^
^
Cplus6230104-#6,640 You think mothers provide “rights,” and can take them away on a whim.

NFBW: You are a liar CarsomyrPlusSix - I wrote about the specific circumstances of “Women who are pregnant” - I did not say anything about “mothers” . And you as a foul mouthed atheist have zero moral authority to proclaim as you repeatedly do that “the living organism that is developing inside the womb” have the same human rights and value as the pregnant woman who sustains it.

END2301052311

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: You are a liar CarsomyrPlusSix - I wrote about the specific circumstances of “Women who are pregnant” - I did not say anything about “mothers”

You fucking moron. Women who have sexually reproduced and made offspring are mothers. Pregnant women are mothers.

There is no argument against this. You are just that stupid. Drink cyanide while sticking forks in electrical sockets.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Pregnant women are mothers.

NFBW: No.

expectant mother​

noun​

: a woman who is pregnant

Definition of EXPECTANT MOTHER

a woman who is pregnant… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

END230106

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: No.

Look you uneducated layman filth, there is no living organism on this planet that doesn’t have parent organism, and sexually reproducing organisms like humans have two.

The female parent is a mother. The male parent is a father. This is basic biology. Words mean things.

Once you have created new organisms, they are your offspring and you are a parent.

Whatever laymen nonsense you spew won’t alter that reality one iota.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Cplus6230106-#6,648 CarsomyrPlusSix “The female parent is a mother.”

NFBW: (1) Yes. And so why is your nose in an expectant mother’s uterus during the privacy of her pregnancy when you are not the expectant father. Are you a pervert or something? Who do you think you are?

NFBW: (2) Yes. And so why is your nose in an expectant mother’s uterus during the privacy of her pregnancy at the time and prior to the moment when the living human organism ceases to be a part of it’s mother’s body when the cord is cut and the first breaths of the viable newborn baby are recorded in a normal civil society?

Why won’t you discuss South Carolina’s State Supreme Court’s ruling in the Constitutional right of privacy keeping abortion legal up to twenty weeks at about the time that fetal viability outside the womb comes into decision time for expectant mothers?

END2301060993 Happy failed insurrection day for election losers like Trump and you.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Yes.

Good, you understand the basic concept for once. Now stop breathing so you can end on a high note.

privacy

Irrelevant, fucktard.

Are you a pervert or something? Who do you think you are?

Someone who doesn’t like needless violence, not a piece of shit waste of oxygen fucktard like you.

ceases to be a part of it’s mother’s body

We would have to be a part of our mother’s body, EVER, to stop being part of her body. Fuck you, troll, you will never learn basic fact, stop wasting oxygen.

Why won’t you discuss South Carolina

Because I don’t care about your constant non-sequitur change the subject bullshit that you don’t even understand and can’t relate in the first place. Stop wasting oxygen.

Happy failed insurrection day

There was no “insurrection,” you are beyond retarded, you are genetic poison, you need to be removed from the gene pool for the good of humanity. Your eventual death will be cause for great celebration.

Stop wasting oxygen.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Leo123230102-#1 Leo123 Trump blamed pro-lifers for 2020 election. He said: “ •••• “It wasn’t my fault that the Republicans didn’t live up to expectations in the MidTerms. I was 233-20! It was the ‘abortion issue,’ poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on No Exceptions, even in the case of Rape, Incest, or Life of the Mother, that lost large numbers of Voters.”

Delldude2310102-#13 @Delldude Who holds the House?

NFBW: 20 election, denying, Jan6 insurrection supporting, MAGA
Absolutely imbecilic Trump diehard Republicans Holding the House hostage.

But alas, if you wanna blame anybody for the GOP losing the Senate and barely winning the house, you would blame Trump and the three Catholic judges that he put on the Supreme Court who fucked up and scheduled the Dobbs decision prior to the midterms.

However, Trump is correct this time just like he was once before when he was running for president the first time and told the GOP masses that the invasion of Iraq was a big fuck up and it was based on a lie.

Trump has actually told the truth a few times.

END2301061308

 

[beagle9]

NFBW: No.

expectant mother​

noun​

: a woman who is pregnant

Definition of EXPECTANT MOTHER

a woman who is pregnant… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

END230106

So you are a leftist straight out of hell eh ?

A woman pregnant is a mother at the time of conception.

No if and's or but's about it.

But that's just it, you are part of the crowd that is attempting to change language, math, history, people's biological make up, otherwise by agreeing with the bull shite that they are dreaming up in their head's etc.

You know, if a poor uneducated person (that has no common sense to boot), were to read your ridiculous bull crap, then they might actually be fooled by it, but thank God there's more with good common sense than there are of those who think like you, and have no common sense atall.

Now take this and go write one of your boring long book like post that no one gives a shite about.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

beagle9230106-#6,652 beagle9 A woman pregnant is a mother at the time of conception. •••• No if and's or but's about it.

NFBW: Yes. She is an expectant mother.

What is your point ? Are you banning words like “expectant” now? I posted recent important news related to this thread. Have you anything to say about it?

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled today 01/05/23 that the ‘six weeks heartbeat abortion restrictions’ violate the state constitution’s right to privacy.​

​

abortion.jpg.webp​

​

South Carolina's 6-week abortion ban is unconstitutional, state Supreme Court rule​

​

COLUMBIA, S.C. — The South Carolina Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the state’s six-week abortion ban, ruling it violated the state’s constitutional right to privacy. In a 3-2 vote, the state’s high court wrote, in part, “We hold that our state constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s decision to have an abortion.”​

END2302061923

 

[NotfooledbyW]

DGS48221009-#11 Abortion is wrong because it is the taking of a human life. The circumstances surrounding the creation of that life are not relevant, any more than they would be relevant with a small child.

NFBW: Here is a fact that has never been refuted on this thread:

Legal Abortion is a private decision by a pregnant woman to take a not viable human life that is using her body, brain heart and lungs to be alive.

Why do you always leave the pertinent qualification out when you push an agenda to have government force pregnant women carry pregnancies to full term?

You must be aware that a small child has proven to be viable outside of a womb and a 16 week fetus is biologically not capable of surviving outside of the pregnant woman’s womb where it lives.

END2301062003

 

[beagle9]

beagle9230106-#6,652 beagle9 A woman pregnant is a mother at the time of conception. •••• No if and's or but's about it.

NFBW: Yes. She is an expectant mother.

What is your point ? Are you banning words like “expectant” now? I posted recent important news related to this thread. Have you anything to say about it?

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled today 01/05/23 that the ‘six weeks heartbeat abortion restrictions’ violate the state constitution’s right to privacy.​

​

abortion.jpg.webp​

​

South Carolina's 6-week abortion ban is unconstitutional, state Supreme Court rule​

​

COLUMBIA, S.C. — The South Carolina Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the state’s six-week abortion ban, ruling it violated the state’s constitutional right to privacy. In a 3-2 vote, the state’s high court wrote, in part, “We hold that our state constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s decision to have an abortion.”​

END2302061923

Are you stupid or something, now why would I want to ban any word's ? That's something you on the left champion all the time, and not as you claim we might do who are on the right.

Nobody cares about that hillbilly hell hole down there in South Carolina, so let's move on to the next dumb bull crap lame accusation or News from your idiocy which is what ??? Don't strain yourself now.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Are you stupid or something, now why would I want to ban any word's ? That's something you on the left champion all the time, and not as you claim we might do who are on the right.

Nobody cares about that hillbilly hell hole down there in South Carolina, so let's move on to the next dumb bull crap lame accusation or News from your idiocy which is what ??? Don't strain yourself now.

He’s straining with laymen ignorance and trying to pretend that biology - which he hates and doesn’t understand- doesn’t exist whenever possible, especially when inconvenient to him.

In this, he literally is calling me a “liar” for calling mothers “mothers,” and I am beyond sick of his bullshit.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: Here is a fact that has never been refuted on this thread

From a lying piece of shit allergic to facts, I doubt it.

Legal Abortion is a private decision

Legal abortion is a human rights abuse
It is a homicide. Like most homicides, the perpetrator wants it done in secret to avoid the knowledge of others and thus any repercussions. But of course because this is aggressive violence, “privacy” is of zero concern whatsoever.

Refuted.

by a pregnant woman to take a not viable

Irrelevant. With your braindeath, we should not consider you viable at this point.

Refuted.

Corrected:
“Legal abortion is a human rights abuse, because it aggressive violence by one human against another must be prosecuted by a just government and has no expectation of privacy whatsoever. Abortion is when a mother hires a contract killer who then uses a variety of methods to kill her own son or daughter, which is obviously depraved and deplorable to any sensible and moral person, as individuals attacking and committing the homicide of the innocent is never morally justifiable, and moreover this perpetrator is the protector and provider for this victim, entirely responsible for providing their well-being, based upon their own action, their own choice, to commit the action that makes kids.”

There you go, you subhuman filth that ought to be loaded up on an abortion truck: the revision makes it accurate, factual, and irrefutable.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Cplus6230107-#6,656 CarsomyrPlusSix He’s straining with laymen ignorance and trying to pretend that biology - which he hates and doesn’t understand- doesn’t exist whenever possible, especially when inconvenient to him.

NFBW: The establishment by the Supreme Court of South Carolina this past week is huge in that an expectant mother’s right to privacy is recognized by a God-fearing, Bible Thumping, white Christian nationalist southern state is a legitimate human right. ITS A RIGHT that no Government can deny including a woman’s right to a safe and legal abortion within the limit of doing it before potential viability which can be set as early as the twentieth week of pregnancy.

beagle9230106-#6,655 beagle9 Nobody cares about that hillbilly hell hole down there in South Carolina, ••••

NFBW: Of, Course you two who are posting as members of the irrational, emotional and cruel anti-woman, American Taliban - find South Carolina inconvenient to be discussed among rational human beings such as myself Thanks for the removal of any doubt that such reality may be true.

You celebrated Dobbs decision is a huge dud for you Taliban who want to beat all women into submission to your extremist white American Christian will.

You should have paid attention to what Alito said:

NFBW2212-#6,207 “Alito is a highly educated Catholic on the Supreme Court. Alito said along with the Dobbs decision the following quote:”

“For our part, we do not question the motives of either those who have supported and those who have opposed laws restricting abortion,” Sam Alito..​

END2301070840

 

[NotfooledbyW]

It is a homicide.

NFBW: Not considered publically to be so by Sam Alito.

“For our part, we do not question the motives of either those who have supported and those who have opposed laws restricting abortion,” Sam Alito..

Who do you think you are CarsomyrPlusSix ????? Are you Mankind’s first Atheist Moses presenting commandments in stone from the outer reaches of primordial darkness?

You are a couple and a half centuries too late in America because if quickening and important legal language that Alito has written and a 1908 rape case in Portland Oregon.

A.Tang220602 Appearing before the Oregon Supreme Court, attorneys for the state insisted that “abortion is not a crime” under Oregon law unless it results in the death “of a quick fetus.” Dunn had accordingly broken no law because he performed Kruse’s abortion prior to quickening—the point at which a fetus makes its first noticeable movement, as early as fifteen or sixteen weeks in pregnancy.​

​

This is devastating for Alito’s argument. Here’s why.​

What Justice Alito Can Learn From a 114-Year-Old Sex Abuse Scandal​

Recall that the leaked opinion overturns Roe v. Wade on the basis of a particular legal test: The Constitution, it says, can only protect the right to abortion if it is “deeply rooted in our nation’s history and tradition.” Alito recognizes that this test is actually terrible for him as of the founding because every state then in the union respected the “distinction between pre- and post-quickening abortion” and treated the former as no crime at all.​

NFBW: South Carolina’s Supreme Court just ruled that “right to privacy” covers “right to abortion prior to quickening” same as it was legally true in all thirteen colonies when the Constitution was written .
I see why CarsomyrPlusSix and beagle9 do not want to talk about it.

END2301070856

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: Not considered

Words have meanings, retard.

You have conceded abortion victims are human beings.

Every killing of a human being is a homicide, by definition.

You lose, as always. You are a perpetual loser. You can be nothing else.

Fuck off already. Off the mortal coil, preferably, and into the abyss where you belong.