Liberal says hate crime hoaxes can be learning experiences

“People were forced to think about things that they didn’t think about, maybe, before,” said Amberly Carter, a coordinator at the university’s Multicultural Resource Center who helped organize the rally. “So do we now stop defending black women because of what happened?”

This is (yet another) great example of how ideology distorts thought processes and turns otherwise intelligent people into lunatics.
.
 
Haha how fucking predictable.

Shit like this folks is why Trump is winning.

We the people are so sick of this bullshit.
 
no quote from the link?

I aint got time to follow links
Well, I have plenty of time to follow links.

I love to get lost in the internet.

However, I am well aware after many years of research, which organizations are associated with, and have employees which are members of the ruling class. In other words, PROPAGANDA.

The New York Times is the mast head, the main news source of the Council on Foreign Affairs.

The elites have their own journal the is the official publication, but the NYT is pretty much for everyone else. Thus, you pretty much know it is a waste of your time. . .
 
no quote from the link?

I aint got time to follow links
Well, I have plenty of time to follow links.

I love to get lost in the internet.

However, I am well aware after many years of research, which organizations are associated with, and have employees which are members of the ruling class. In other words, PROPAGANDA.

The New York Times is the mast head, the main news source of the Council on Foreign Affairs.

The elites have their own journal the is the official publication, but the NYT is pretty much for everyone else. Thus, you pretty much know it is a waste of your time. . .
I love to get lost in the internet as well, and typically if I start a thread I include a partial quote, a pic if I can, to make the thread look a bit more interesting. And I do not have time to read and go to the link, at this time. Maybe later, but not now.

I understand, but for a lot of people, they will not follow the link and I think that is not great for your thread. Just my opinion.
 
The learning experience should be if you do it charges await you when it's found out
 
no quote from the link?

I aint got time to follow links
Well, I have plenty of time to follow links.

I love to get lost in the internet.

However, I am well aware after many years of research, which organizations are associated with, and have employees which are members of the ruling class. In other words, PROPAGANDA.

The New York Times is the mast head, the main news source of the Council on Foreign Affairs.

The elites have their own journal the is the official publication, but the NYT is pretty much for everyone else. Thus, you pretty much know it is a waste of your time. . .
I love to get lost in the internet as well, and typically if I start a thread I include a partial quote, a pic if I can, to make the thread look a bit more interesting. And I do not have time to read and go to the link, at this time. Maybe later, but not now.

I understand, but for a lot of people, they will not follow the link and I think that is not great for your thread. Just my opinion.

Basically, the paradigm here, is WHY is the NYT covering this story in the first place?

And HOW are they covering the story?


Their purpose is to divide white against blacks. They want to stir up racial animosity. It is no different than going to Alex Jones and watching that CIA shill's disinfo fear porn. IT's all about making folks angry and fearful. It's about sowing division in the population. . . .
 
Anyone that makes a false claim should be punished for their actions. That doesn't mean that claim never happens, it just means it didn't happen that time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top