Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Harvard has a huge endowment, I doubt they rely on government fundsHarvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism
Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.
How much are you paid to post this nonsense? As long as Harvard accepts government funds they can't discriminate.
.
In this case, the courts said they are not discriminating
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.
Let's check.
"Asian-Americans are among the most successful groups in the United States, but we often forget the discrimination they faced in getting where they are, as well as the challenges they still endure.
Yet despite this discrimination, Asians thrived. They now earn income above the national average of whites and exceed whites in education levels -- but race still affects their entry into America's elite.
My Center for Equal Opportunity this week published a study looking at Asian acceptance rates at three elite universities: Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology. The study's author, Dr. Althea Nagai, looked at acceptance rates at the three schools and found that the two that use race and ethnicity as factors in admission, Harvard and MIT, appear to cap Asian acceptance rates, much as rates of acceptance for Jews were limited by elite schools in early eras.
Isn't it time we quit pretending that using race in college admissions is morally acceptable because it helps some minorities? Asians have suffered enough discrimination over the years; they shouldn't face it now in the name of improving diversity."
Asians Face Ceiling in College Admissions
Remember the last time you were right about anything....anything????
Me neither.
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.
All Rise!
Today's lesson-
Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.
The honorable IM2, Instructor.
Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.
17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.
Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.
Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.
Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.
Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.
My argument has everything to do with this. As for your last sentence, I'm not paying attention to a white with a sub zero IQ even after they have been given everything this government can give, such as you. Without AA, asians don't go to Harvard. And they most certainly don't represent almost 4 times their population at Harvard without the policy.
So be quiet dumbo.
You must have gotten up on the wrong side of the cage this morning.
"Without AA, asians (sic) don't go to Harvard."
Let's check:
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
I always like seeing your posts…they bring a new dimension to the conversation.
Wait…did I say ‘dimension’?
I meant ‘dimentia.’
This above proves how today’s education system is a total fraud and joke
Their insane greed brings in more students to college that could not pass the sat tests
So they just give them the points they needed and helped them get monster student debt
All for enriching the crooked educators
And now educators are also covering up science instead of going with science
They cover up
Science that says abortion is murder of a human being with its own DNA code
A lot of democrats and deep
State must face the gallows !
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.
Let's check.
"Asian-Americans are among the most successful groups in the United States, but we often forget the discrimination they faced in getting where they are, as well as the challenges they still endure.
Yet despite this discrimination, Asians thrived. They now earn income above the national average of whites and exceed whites in education levels -- but race still affects their entry into America's elite.
My Center for Equal Opportunity this week published a study looking at Asian acceptance rates at three elite universities: Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology. The study's author, Dr. Althea Nagai, looked at acceptance rates at the three schools and found that the two that use race and ethnicity as factors in admission, Harvard and MIT, appear to cap Asian acceptance rates, much as rates of acceptance for Jews were limited by elite schools in early eras.
Isn't it time we quit pretending that using race in college admissions is morally acceptable because it helps some minorities? Asians have suffered enough discrimination over the years; they shouldn't face it now in the name of improving diversity."
Asians Face Ceiling in College Admissions
Remember the last time you were right about anything....anything????
Me neither.
Try using facts and not townhall bullshit.
Except the majority of Asians are democrats. Whites discriminate against Asians just as they do everyone else who is not white.Take a wild guess why Democrats don't entertain Asian people? It's because they're primarily hard-working, honorable, intelligent people and don't suit "the crutch". They could give a flying fuck this discrimination has occurred. They're just trying to "level the playing field" to the lowest common denominator.
So you know, white people discriminate against "people of color", unless of course they're Asian, somehow.
Throw the blacks a bone and keep them in their place. Tell U.S. citizens they're better off replaced by illegal Hispanics, replace Christianity and Judaism with Islam, and run the entire country right down the shit-hole. That's today's left.
Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?What would you have done if you were judge?Shocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
PC is a sellout. If she was black she'd be an Uncle Tom. She suffers from internalized racism. She lacks self esteem and pride in her heritage.
Internalized racism is defined as the "internalization of racial oppression by the racially subordinated." In a study named “The Psychology of Racism”, Robin Nicole Johnson points out that internalized racism entails both "conscious and unconscious acceptance of a racial hierarchy in which whites are consistently ranked above people of color." People who suffer from internalized racism believe negative stereotypes of their own race. They will adopt white standards and thinking. Doing these things mentally lets them deny that racism exists.
Internalized racism reinforces racism. Internalized racism keeps racism alive. It creates a justification for racism. This acceptance of white supremacy as the norm leads to conclusions that racism is not a problem, or that it does not exist.
Lest we doubt this, PC has adopted the white racist claim of there is no such thing as white supremacy. There are many other dysfunctions she suffers from but that's a thread topic by itself.
Most asians are not like her. She's a loser incel female unable to function in society because she wants to be white instead of being herself.
18MillionRising.org
18MillionRising.org (18MR.org) brings Asian American communities together online and offline to reimagine Asian American identity with nuance, specificity, and power. We are using this Asian American identity as the foundation to build a more just and creative world where our experiences are affirmed, our leadership is valued, and all of us have the opportunity to thrive.
Using technology and popular culture, we develop new ways for Asian Americans and our allies to collaborate, create new ways of being, and transform the world around us. We utilize digital-first advocacy tactics to elevate the voices of and mobilize our over 120,000 members to take action on issues that matter to them. We create meeting places online where young Asian Americans can deliberate together about what it means to be Asian American in the 21st century.
As a member of the Allied Media Projects Sponsored Projects Network, we also hold the AMP Network Principles as central to our work.
Operating Principles
Who We Are, Where We’re From
Co-Conspirators Instead of Allies
- We do not see the Asian American identity as monolithic. We come from South, Southeast, and East Asian diasporas; we are multiracial; we come from many waves of immigration. As we build together, we highlight and celebrate the differences in our cultures, languages, and values while uplifting the principles that bring us together in the first place.
- We understand that the intersections of multiple identities make many in our communities more vulnerable while making our solutions more sustainable: not only are we people of color, we are also transgender, women, Muslims, queers, working class or poor, disabled, and/or undocumented, just to name a few. In order to build a more just world, we must understand the ways in which these identities create barriers and opportunities in our organizing.
- We acknowledge that the United States was founded on the genocide of native people and the labor of Black people forcibly brought to this continent through chattel enslavement. These truths underlie many of the large social dynamics we work to combat, and we acknowledge that we must fight our own complicity in anti-Black racism and settler colonialism. As communities of color in solidarity with other communities of color, we are committed to ending white supremacy.
- We acknowledge the pervasive role capitalism has played in ripping our communities apart through mass incarceration, gentrification, deportation, climate change, and consumerism. We know that capitalism extracts value from all people and resources in its path, and we must adapt to dismantle, supplant, and replace it with sustainable alternatives.
Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?What would you have done if you were judge?Shocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
AWRIGHT!FAILShocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed
Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
You forgot to post anything about men being better than women
Men are more logical than women which makes them harder to fool and makes them understand what is the correct justice that brings progress
Sucks being AsianOk, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?What would you have done if you were judge?
I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?What would you have done if you were judge?
I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?
I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.
justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice
1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
It is becoming very obvious that you dont have productive solutions you just want to post partisan complaints. Prove me wrong.
No no no. You don’t get to dodge my question 5 times and then continue to ignore it to keep asking me questions. I answered yours and I’m happy to answer more but it’s a give and take thing. Give me a straight answer and then I’ll do the same for you. For the 6th time... what would you do to fix the problem?I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.Ok, so what does that entail? How would you rectify the situation?
This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
It is becoming very obvious that you dont have productive solutions you just want to post partisan complaints. Prove me wrong.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
No no no. You don’t get to dodge my question 5 times and then continue to ignore it to keep asking me questions. I answered yours and I’m happy to answer more but it’s a give and take thing. Give me a straight answer and then I’ll do the same for you. For the 6th time... what would you do to fix the problem?I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.This is the third request that you answer the question.
Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
It is becoming very obvious that you dont have productive solutions you just want to post partisan complaints. Prove me wrong.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
What does the current situation prove about this sort? That’s your big question? I guess the answer you want to hear is that Libs Dems and Progs are big bad racists.No no no. You don’t get to dodge my question 5 times and then continue to ignore it to keep asking me questions. I answered yours and I’m happy to answer more but it’s a give and take thing. Give me a straight answer and then I’ll do the same for you. For the 6th time... what would you do to fix the problem?I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.I’m very happy to answer your questions but you’ve dodged mine 4 times now. I keep asking what you would do and you keep squirming away from an answer and then Pasting a bunch of crap that’s not related to my question. If you want the respect of a straight answer then you should start giving straight answers.
With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?
You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
It is becoming very obvious that you dont have productive solutions you just want to post partisan complaints. Prove me wrong.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
Actually, I do.
I get to do whatever I wish.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
What does the current situation prove about this sort? That’s your big question? I guess the answer you want to hear is that Libs Dems and Progs are big bad racists.No no no. You don’t get to dodge my question 5 times and then continue to ignore it to keep asking me questions. I answered yours and I’m happy to answer more but it’s a give and take thing. Give me a straight answer and then I’ll do the same for you. For the 6th time... what would you do to fix the problem?I never denied anything in the OP. I’ve just asked what you’d do to fix the problem and this is the 5th time now you’ve dodged answering. I gave you the respect of a direct answer why can’t you do the same.You voluntarily subscribed to this thread, the OP authored by moi.
Nothing I've posted is deniable.
"With that said, I’ll be the bigger person and answer your question...
The SAT discrepancies do not seem legit
Now you answer mine. If you were in charge, what would you do about it to fix the problem?"
Which leads, ineluctably to this:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
It is becoming very obvious that you dont have productive solutions you just want to post partisan complaints. Prove me wrong.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
Actually, I do.
I get to do whatever I wish.
Finish answering the question:
Liberals, Democrats, Progressives own and operate the education system.
What does the current situation prove about this sort?
In the past I have exposed several of your lies.
I'm giving you the opportunity to be honest.
Ok so now that’s out of the way... can you answer my question that I’ve asked 7 times now?
