It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.
JoeB131, I have several college degrees you douchebag. Negroes not being able to obtain those degrees is not my problem you punk! By the way, I have color, non-Whites are like brown and black, which is not color.
No, they are currently experiencing systemic and institutional racism....
Shocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
Harvard has a huge endowment, I doubt they rely on government fundsHarvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism
Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.
How much are you paid to post this nonsense? As long as Harvard accepts government funds they can't discriminate.
.
FAILShocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed
Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
Yes, those whites that get slots for crew and water polo even if they never played the gameNo, they are currently experiencing systemic and institutional racism....
Not really. College admissions take a lot of factors into account.
We have affirmative action for white people. they are called "Legacies" and "Athletics"
FAILShocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed
Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
You forgot to post anything about men being better than women
Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?What would you have done if you were judge?Shocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.
This seem legit to you????
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????
Then you must be a Liberal.
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.
All Rise!
Today's lesson-
Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.
The honorable IM2, Instructor.
Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.
17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.
Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.
If laws don't remain on the books, we will go back to overt discrimination. This case was a prime example of how whites are playing non whites against each other in order to move us backwards.Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism
Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.
All Rise!
Today's lesson-
Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.
The honorable IM2, Instructor.
Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.
17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.
Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.
Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.
Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.
Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.
All Rise!
Today's lesson-
Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.
The honorable IM2, Instructor.
Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.
17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.
Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.
Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.
Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.
Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.
My argument has everything to do with this. As for your last sentence, I'm not paying attention to a white with a sub zero IQ even after they have been given everything this government can give, such as you. Without AA, asians don't go to Harvard. And they most certainly don't represent almost 4 times their population at Harvard without the policy.
So be quiet dumbo.
Except the majority of Asians are democrats. Whites discriminate against Asians just as they do everyone else who is not white.Take a wild guess why Democrats don't entertain Asian people? It's because they're primarily hard-working, honorable, intelligent people and don't suit "the crutch". They could give a flying fuck this discrimination has occurred. They're just trying to "level the playing field" to the lowest common denominator.
So you know, white people discriminate against "people of color", unless of course they're Asian, somehow.
Throw the blacks a bone and keep them in their place. Tell U.S. citizens they're better off replaced by illegal Hispanics, replace Christianity and Judaism with Islam, and run the entire country right down the shit-hole. That's today's left.
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....
Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.
Shocker, huh?
Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.
1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.
The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."
2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”
To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.
2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.
The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.
Proof abounds.
Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed
Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.
All Rise!
Today's lesson-
Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.
The honorable IM2, Instructor.
Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.
17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.
Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.
Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.
Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.
Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.
My argument has everything to do with this. As for your last sentence, I'm not paying attention to a white with a sub zero IQ even after they have been given everything this government can give, such as you. Without AA, asians don't go to Harvard. And they most certainly don't represent almost 4 times their population at Harvard without the policy.
So be quiet dumbo.
You must have gotten up on the wrong side of the cage this morning.
"Without AA, asians (sic) don't go to Harvard."
Let's check:
"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
I always like seeing your posts…they bring a new dimension to the conversation.
Wait…did I say ‘dimension’?
I meant ‘dimentia.’