Liberal Judge Rules In Favor Of Racism

JoeB131, I have several college degrees you douchebag. Negroes not being able to obtain those degrees is not my problem you punk! By the way, I have color, non-Whites are like brown and black, which is not color.

Guy, nobody believes you have more than a High School education, if that. You can't even write a simple sentence.

Now, if you learned how to use a comma, I'd be more impressed.

Here, let me help you out.

shopping


Oh, Brown is a color. Black and white are shades.
 
Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed

Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
 
Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.
Harvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?


How much are you paid to post this nonsense? As long as Harvard accepts government funds they can't discriminate.

.
Harvard has a huge endowment, I doubt they rely on government funds

In this case, the courts said they are not discriminating
 
Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed

Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
FAIL

You forgot to post anything about men being better than women
 
No, they are currently experiencing systemic and institutional racism....

Not really. College admissions take a lot of factors into account.

We have affirmative action for white people. they are called "Legacies" and "Athletics"
Yes, those whites that get slots for crew and water polo even if they never played the game
 
Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed

Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world
FAIL

You forgot to post anything about men being better than women

Men are more logical than women which makes them harder to fool and makes them understand what is the correct justice that brings progress
 
Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.
What would you have done if you were judge?



I'm far too honest to be a Obama-appointee.




This seem legit to you????

"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




You like the idea that America is a classed society based on melanin????

Then you must be a Liberal.
Oh, I’m just asking what you would do if you were the judge in this case?



I'd decide in favor of justice and American ideals.....not Liberal ones.


justice
noun
jus·tice | \ ˈjə-stəs \
Definition of justice


1a: the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments Definition of JUSTICE



Now...how 'bout you answer the question:
This seem legit to you????

"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply
 
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.

All Rise!

Today's lesson-

Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.

The honorable IM2, Instructor.

Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.

17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.

Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.

th



How deftly I force the lesser among us to devolve to vulgarity.


It is the ultimate proof, both, that I am correct, and that he is deeply, deeply, injured.


Excellent.
 
Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.
If laws don't remain on the books, we will go back to overt discrimination. This case was a prime example of how whites are playing non whites against each other in order to move us backwards.



Now that you're here, perhaps you'd care to answer a question I asked you ....that caused you to run with your tail between your legs.


Try answering now:


With respect to the education gap, how is it that 'racism' is responsible for these areas in which black students fall short when compared to white and Asian students:

The number of days absent from school

The number of hours spent watching TV

The number of pages read for homework

Quantity and quality of reading material in the home

The presence of two parents in the home.





How does 'racism' explain these ...deficiencies????
 
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.

All Rise!

Today's lesson-

Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.

The honorable IM2, Instructor.

Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.

17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.

Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.

th

Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.

Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.

Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.




Asian were lucky enough not to have Liberals/Democrats there to 'help' them.


Otherwise, we might be as vulgar and ignorant as that dunce, waiting around to be 'helped.'


"It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived."
Coulter
 
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.

All Rise!

Today's lesson-

Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.

The honorable IM2, Instructor.

Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.

17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.

Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.

th

Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.

Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.

Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.

My argument has everything to do with this. As for your last sentence, I'm not paying attention to a white with a sub zero IQ even after they have been given everything this government can give, such as you. Without AA, asians don't go to Harvard. And they most certainly don't represent almost 4 times their population at Harvard without the policy.

So be quiet dumbo.



You must have gotten up on the wrong side of the cage this morning.



"Without AA, asians (sic) don't go to Harvard."


Let's check:

"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




I always like seeing your posts…they bring a new dimension to the conversation.

Wait…did I say ‘dimension’?

I meant ‘dimentia.’
 
Take a wild guess why Democrats don't entertain Asian people? It's because they're primarily hard-working, honorable, intelligent people and don't suit "the crutch". They could give a flying fuck this discrimination has occurred. They're just trying to "level the playing field" to the lowest common denominator.

So you know, white people discriminate against "people of color", unless of course they're Asian, somehow.

Throw the blacks a bone and keep them in their place. Tell U.S. citizens they're better off replaced by illegal Hispanics, replace Christianity and Judaism with Islam, and run the entire country right down the shit-hole. That's today's left.
Except the majority of Asians are democrats. Whites discriminate against Asians just as they do everyone else who is not white.


"Whites discriminate against Asians just as they do everyone else who is not white."


Must be why the Muslim was elected twice, huh?



If I ever needed a brain transplant I’d want yours….’cause I’d want one that had never been used.
 
It needs to be explained because left wingers/democrats are irrational....

Asian Americans haven't experienced 400 years of systematic and institutional racism.


Let's check.


"Asian-Americans are among the most successful groups in the United States, but we often forget the discrimination they faced in getting where they are, as well as the challenges they still endure.

Yet despite this discrimination, Asians thrived. They now earn income above the national average of whites and exceed whites in education levels -- but race still affects their entry into America's elite.


My Center for Equal Opportunity this week published a study looking at Asian acceptance rates at three elite universities: Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology. The study's author, Dr. Althea Nagai, looked at acceptance rates at the three schools and found that the two that use race and ethnicity as factors in admission, Harvard and MIT, appear to cap Asian acceptance rates, much as rates of acceptance for Jews were limited by elite schools in early eras.

Isn't it time we quit pretending that using race in college admissions is morally acceptable because it helps some minorities? Asians have suffered enough discrimination over the years; they shouldn't face it now in the name of improving diversity."
Asians Face Ceiling in College Admissions




Remember the last time you were right about anything....anything????



Me neither.
 
Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Today’s educators have been proven as total fraudsters with insane greed

Today’s educators are the biggest liars and hypocrites in the world



Everything taken over by the Liberals/Democrats/Progressives, suffers as a result.
 
This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.

All Rise!

Today's lesson-

Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.

The honorable IM2, Instructor.

Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.

17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.

Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.

th

Based on this argument (and I use that term loosely), I suspect you didn't graduate from Harvard or even High School.

Your basic premise has nothing to do with what happened.

Asians are smater than blacks. End of discussion.

My argument has everything to do with this. As for your last sentence, I'm not paying attention to a white with a sub zero IQ even after they have been given everything this government can give, such as you. Without AA, asians don't go to Harvard. And they most certainly don't represent almost 4 times their population at Harvard without the policy.

So be quiet dumbo.



You must have gotten up on the wrong side of the cage this morning.



"Without AA, asians (sic) don't go to Harvard."


Let's check:

"Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




I always like seeing your posts…they bring a new dimension to the conversation.

Wait…did I say ‘dimension’?

I meant ‘dimentia.’


This above proves how today’s education system is a total fraud and joke

Their insane greed brings in more students to college that could not pass the sat tests

So they just give them the points they needed and helped them get monster student debt

All for enriching the crooked educators

And now educators are also covering up science instead of going with science

They cover up
Science that says abortion is murder of a human being with its own DNA code


A lot of democrats and deep
State must face the gallows !
 

Forum List

Back
Top