The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,574
- 918
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #221
Why don't you stop yapping?challenge what?
Why don't you post something that is worthy of indictment?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why don't you stop yapping?challenge what?
Why don't you post something that is worthy of indictment?
Wrong.Pick one to challenge.
No, it means that people will be more likely to notice and not make a follow up post claiming the obvious that it was my opinion.Yep, it's usually what capitalizing means. And does that mean it means more? LOL
I already did.Wrong.
Burden of proof is on you
And you can't deliver.
You did not, and you know you did not.I already did.
He indisputably "incited" it.
Where only the Demcorats got to bring witnesses,You did not, and you know you did not.
Disagree?
Cite the post and copy/paste the text to that effect.
You didn't hear the sworn testimony of those who were there.No, he held a rally like so many of the Communists have and they said much more caustic things than Trump ever did. Remember Trump offered to have the National Guard there from the beginning of the day that was refused by the Capitol police chief under advisement that it would give "bad optics."
I know you're a leftist and therefore hate our Constitution. But we all have the right to free speech in this country. And unless you can show us any words used by Trump that specifically ordered the crowd to attack the Capitol, you have no case because Thought Police are only in your Holy Bible and it's not reality.
Ray,
Do you frequently opine on matters with which you are entirely unfamiliar?
I bet you also dabble in Virology.
Yes.Where only the Demcorats got to bring witnesses,
They deposed everyone at the WH on the 5th and 6th...the only one left is Meadows, and he doesn't want to talk under oath.
You cannot demonstrate that Trump incited anything re: Jan 6.
I can cite at least one Republican who was there....and is a lawyer.
CAN YOU SEE IT NOW?
Ray,If there are any highlights of that bore fest, evil right-wing television plays them. And so far on USMB, all I've seen was "could have, should have, would have" so you apparently have nothing either. Your leaders won't push this matter very hard either because they know the retaliation that's going to take place with the change of gavel. We're going to have a real 1/6 investigation where the Republicans are going to ask the questions and leftist witnesses will have to answer unless they plea the 5th which I expect a lot of. I anxiously await the questioning of Piglosi, the police Chief, Wray and others.
We'll see who laughs last in this matter.
So, we're back to...Yes.
I can see - with absolute clarity - you have no idea whatsoever what constitutes "proof"
Thanks for playing.
The part where what you posted proves anything, much less your claim.What part do you challenge?
To whom?The part where what you posted proves anything, much less your claim.
To any rational, reasoned person who undertsand the concept of "proof".To whom?
Most people keep their opinions to themselvesNo, it means that people will be more likely to notice and not make a follow up post claiming the obvious that it was my opinion.
It doesn't always work but all I can do is try.
Some of them did plan, do agree with you that many of them did not think about the possible consequences, and just got caught up in the madness.Insurrections are planned.
Those mentally ill clowns didn’t get together and plan anything.
The question is the numerical value of "some".Some of them did plan, do agree with you that many of them did not think about the possible consequences, and just got caught up in the madness.
Before we go any further...To any rational, reasoned person who undertsand the concept of "proof".
Yeah, I can see where people wouldn't want to share opinions on a political message board. Lol.Most people keep their opinions to themselves