Illegal Voters Removed....

[jc456]

how do you know? Nope it says illegals and inactive. learn to read.

the actual judicial watch article does not mention illegal.

that comes from hype sites like dynamite candy.

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.[/QUOTE]
I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

 

[jc456]

how do you know? Nope it says illegals and inactive. learn to read.

the actual judicial watch article does not mention illegal.

that comes from hype sites like dynamite candy.

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

Have we been found out as fuckin gullible idiot...[/QUOTE]
yes you are.

 

[iceberg]

the actual judicial watch article does not mention illegal.

that comes from hype sites like dynamite candy.

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

 

[Dragonlady]

Lol, they weren't illegals.

We've been over this already kiddo. They were inactive voters. That is people who haven't voted in the last however many election . Only your RWNJ fake news source said anything about illegals.

how do you know? Nope it says illegals and inactive. learn to read.

the actual judicial watch article does not mention illegal.

that comes from hype sites like dynamite candy.

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.[/QUOTE]

Lying Russian pieces of shit. You Russians keep pushing this illegal voter narrative to destroy faith in the election process. You're not fooling anyone.

 

[iceberg]

how do you know? Nope it says illegals and inactive. learn to read.

the actual judicial watch article does not mention illegal.

that comes from hype sites like dynamite candy.

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

Lying Russian pieces of shit. You Russians keep pushing this illegal voter narrative to destroy faith in the election process. You're not fooling anyone.[/QUOTE]
and now look - a counter extreme idiot is posting fake russian shit.

you're not fooling anyone.

 

[jc456]

dirty names was his quote.

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23337986, member: 46512"]Tom Fitton on Twitter

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

 

[xband]

The Democrats yet again.

 

[iceberg]

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

What? I thought there weren't any illegals voting. What?

Conservatives Win Massive Lawsuit, 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voters Removed

A bombshell report has proven that President Donald Trump was right — and it’s good news to all patriotic Americans.

As it turns out, there were potentially millions of illegal aliens and ineligible citizens registered to vote in American elections all over the United States in 2016 — and they’re being removed from the voter rolls.

A successful lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch means at least 1.59 million “inactive” and “illegal” registered names on voter rolls in California will be removed.

Back in January, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the State of California and County of Los Angeles amid evidence that potentially millions of people were allowed to illegally vote in American elections.

Voter Fraud is a Voting Rights Violation.
The Racist Democrats are against the Right to Vote

 

[jc456]

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did. All I did was a post a story. you got a problem with the story go bitch at the company that reported it.

BTW, where is the largest illegal population in LA? LA County.

 

[CowboyTed]

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

But you have been found out as posting false information, already debunked a few times...

So read something that just made you feel better, so what if it is false, it made you feel better... The person who wrote this knew you wouldn't check the facts because it makes you feel better... You are used as a tool...

 

[iceberg]

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

again - you didn't post a news story - you posted "dynamite candy" - a hype click bait site who rewrote the original story to get people, like you, riled up. look, it worked.

carry on.

 

[jc456]

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

But you have been found out as posting false information, already debunked a few times...

So read something that just made you feel better, so what if it is false, it made you feel better... The person who wrote this knew you wouldn't check the facts because it makes you feel better... You are used as a tool...

I posted a news story, prove it isn't accurate. be a fking man douchebag, prove there aren't any names of illegals on the list.

 

[jc456]

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

carry on.

yep, so what? you can't prove them wrong.

 

[iceberg]

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

carry on.

yep, so what? you can't prove them wrong.

that's your defense?

 

[jc456]

i'm not going to go dancing all over internet trying to prove you correct when your base reference article from judicial watch never at any point in time says "illegal". you reference it, you tell me how ineligible=illegal.

this is your stretch armstrong and from the source, you are incorrect. all there is to it but rage on. find dynamite candy to say you're right and have a day.

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

you want me to repost your first post? I'm happy to.

 

[iceberg]

I don't fking care dude. you stuck you're little catnip nose in.

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

you want me to repost your first post? I'm happy to.

wait til my laughter dies down. i won't want to miss this.

 

[jc456]

cause you're being an idiot. you rage on for others for making shit up or twisting the truth then run to do it yourself and get all butthurt when called on it.

im the one who should be mad. you made me agree with Crepitus and i'm pretty sure that's a party foul on any board out there.

I posted a fking news story and you came in your pants fk face. I'm not letting you off on this. Do you know for a fact there aren't names of illegals on the list? can you say that? if not, then all you did was inject your goody two shoes shit in my thread.

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

again - you didn't post a news story - you posted "dynamite candy" - a hype click bait site who rewrote the original story to get people, like you, riled up. look, it worked.

carry on.

What? I thought there weren't any illegals voting. What?

Conservatives Win Massive Lawsuit, 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voters Removed

A bombshell report has proven that President Donald Trump was right — and it’s good news to all patriotic Americans.

As it turns out, there were potentially millions of illegal aliens and ineligible citizens registered to vote in American elections all over the United States in 2016 — and they’re being removed from the voter rolls.

A successful lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch means at least 1.59 million “inactive” and “illegal” registered names on voter rolls in California will be removed.

Back in January, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the State of California and County of Los Angeles amid evidence that potentially millions of people were allowed to illegally vote in American elections.

dynamite candy?
another BOMBSHELL?

wish "news" would go back to being news, not something to incite others with.

You inferred I intentionally posted a news story to incite my base. I have no base. Did the story lie? can you actually prove they lied? no, you can't.

 

[iceberg]

heh - i disagreed with you and you went snowflake rage worthy.

you go, you.

if goody two shoes means we need to be honest, guilty as charged. what would you call it if someone was making things up and twisting around facts so they can attack trump?

don't do the shit that pisses you off and you't not be foaming at the mouth right about now telling me i'm all upset cause you are.

please calm down just enough to relearn how to quote. it would help quite a bit for the rest of us to follow your rage-page.

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

again - you didn't post a news story - you posted "dynamite candy" - a hype click bait site who rewrote the original story to get people, like you, riled up. look, it worked.

carry on.

What? I thought there weren't any illegals voting. What?

Conservatives Win Massive Lawsuit, 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voters Removed

A bombshell report has proven that President Donald Trump was right — and it’s good news to all patriotic Americans.

As it turns out, there were potentially millions of illegal aliens and ineligible citizens registered to vote in American elections all over the United States in 2016 — and they’re being removed from the voter rolls.

A successful lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch means at least 1.59 million “inactive” and “illegal” registered names on voter rolls in California will be removed.

Back in January, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the State of California and County of Los Angeles amid evidence that potentially millions of people were allowed to illegally vote in American elections.

dynamite candy?
another BOMBSHELL?

wish "news" would go back to being news, not something to incite others with.

You inferred I intentionally posted a news story to incite my base. I have no base. Did the story lie? can you actually prove they lied? no, you can't.

can you prove it true? no you can't. so you ask me to prove what you said is a lie.

what i can tell you is dynamite candy used judicial watch as a source and twisted what they reported to insert illegals cause it's a key word to set people off.

see mirror as an example.

 

[jc456]

no you didn't fkwad. you insulted me. fk you. post the actual names of the 1.5 million and show me there are no illegal names in there.

i told you that you were wrong. your own source doesn't say what you said it was. if that is an insult to you then sure. but to the rest of the world it's just pointing out inaccuracies.

your list. you prove it. you said they are illegal - show me a few. back up what you say and stop raging at people not raging with you. that so.. so ... snowflake.

it is a list of whatever we want it to be. no one actually knows. It's a crap shoot. the issue is that you don't know and it could be, so it isn't wrong. You're just pontificating as usual. I merely posted a fking news story. you went off. you have no way to prove it isn't true. and yet you injected like you did.

your source - judicial watch - never says illegal.

your hype site did.

the rest is you just being mad it wasn't what you want it to be so it's my fault for noticing. when noticed, you rage at me and tell me to prove you incorrect when i already did referencing your very own source. if you want to prove they MEANT illegals, ask judicial watch to clarify. they should know, it's their lawsuit.

again - you didn't post a news story - you posted "dynamite candy" - a hype click bait site who rewrote the original story to get people, like you, riled up. look, it worked.

carry on.

What? I thought there weren't any illegals voting. What?

Conservatives Win Massive Lawsuit, 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voters Removed

A bombshell report has proven that President Donald Trump was right — and it’s good news to all patriotic Americans.

As it turns out, there were potentially millions of illegal aliens and ineligible citizens registered to vote in American elections all over the United States in 2016 — and they’re being removed from the voter rolls.

A successful lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch means at least 1.59 million “inactive” and “illegal” registered names on voter rolls in California will be removed.

Back in January, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the State of California and County of Los Angeles amid evidence that potentially millions of people were allowed to illegally vote in American elections.

dynamite candy?
another BOMBSHELL?

wish "news" would go back to being news, not something to incite others with.

You inferred I intentionally posted a news story to incite my base. I have no base. Did the story lie? can you actually prove they lied? no, you can't.

can you prove it true? no you can't. so you ask me to prove what you said is a lie.

what i can tell you is dynamite candy used judicial watch as a source and twisted what they reported to insert illegals cause it's a key word to set people off.

see mirror as an example.

I don't have to prove it true, it was an article that i chose to share and I violated nothing to do such a thing. Now if you want to say it isn't true, than post the piece that contradicts the story. It's simple debate 101.