Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
we wont ban guns because we are a primitive species.
Alas if we were only all elitists liberal city snobs like you, eh plasma?
No, just men.
90% of murderers are men.
we wont ban guns because we are a primitive species.
Alas if we were only all elitists liberal city snobs like you, eh plasma?
so there are no people in cities who own guns?
who knew?
btw, not wanting guns doesn't make one a snob. i'd say you're the snob for implying that.
Doesnt matter. There are people, some of them powerful, who do want to ban all guns.Apparently banning all guns is the new conservative lie to be repeated often enough in the hope it's perceived to be true.
Except it isn't a lie, skippy.
Apparently "no one wants to ban all guns" is the liberal lie. We see it repeated here endlessly, despite obvious evidence it isn't true.
What is the national support for banning all guns? As in public opinion. Do you have any evidence it's more than 1%?
More than 5%?
More than 10%?
Who's the we? Aside from the military, the only other folks with guns would be the police. How would you track them down? Armed robberies would increase, especially at convenience stores and gas stations. We can't have armed store owners there now can we?This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.If we banned all guns
Not after we shoot a few thousand of them, for not being in uniform and just having a gun. See how that works now, Skippy?
Doesnt matter. There are people, some of them powerful, who do want to ban all guns.Except it isn't a lie, skippy.
Apparently "no one wants to ban all guns" is the liberal lie. We see it repeated here endlessly, despite obvious evidence it isn't true.
What is the national support for banning all guns? As in public opinion. Do you have any evidence it's more than 1%?
More than 5%?
More than 10%?
But even those claiming they dont, we know what happens. They start with gun restriction. Then there's an incident. So they increase restrictions. Another incident. More restrictions. Another incident. Until finally the only solution is a ban or its equivalent. This is exactly what happened in Germany through the 1970s and on.
Doesnt matter. There are people, some of them powerful, who do want to ban all guns.What is the national support for banning all guns? As in public opinion. Do you have any evidence it's more than 1%?
More than 5%?
More than 10%?
But even those claiming they dont, we know what happens. They start with gun restriction. Then there's an incident. So they increase restrictions. Another incident. More restrictions. Another incident. Until finally the only solution is a ban or its equivalent. This is exactly what happened in Germany through the 1970s and on.
It certainly does matter because you're trying to demagogue the issue by constructing a strawman of totally banning guns that has no place in a real world discussion of gun control.
The Supreme Court struck down the Chicago handgun ban as a violation of the 2nd Amendment. Nobody is going to get a ban past that, and the Supreme Court is not about to reverse it, now or in the future.
And the alternative, repealing the 2nd amendment, is an absurdity.
I'm okay with banning nearly all of them, and if you have one and aren't in uniform, we shoot you dead no questions asked. Problem solved.OK. let's say the Diane Feinsteins of the world got their wish and the US imposed a total ban on guns, no private citizen was allowed to own one. I realize the Supreme Court made that impossible, but let's say it's wet dream week at the DNC.
Then what?
The civil disobesdiance would make Prohibition look like child's play. If the gov't tried to enforce the edict going to house to house they would have a rebellion of major proportions in many places. Sure, not in Commieformia, where men are limp dicks. But in more rural areas, forget it. There isn't an army big enough to enforce that.
OK, so let's say we simply enacted "common sense" gun control like they want. Basically a re-enactment of the Assault Weapons Ban and other provisions like registration of guns, no private sales, etc.
We know what the old AWB did. Nothing. OK, not nothing It drove up the price of hi cap mags and pre ban weapons. It sure didnt stop a single shooting or crime. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result.
There are over 300M guns in this country. The genie is not going back in the bottle.
nice rant. but who wants to ban all guns? i just don't want them in the hands of criminals and crazies.... like most normal people.
This would never happen, by let's say hypothetically it does, then those who'd turn in their guns would be the law abiding citizens. Those left with guns would be the police and criminals. Criminals would start coming out of the woodwork. They'd know that they can commit crimes at will since the only resistance they'll encounter will be from the police. Crime rates will skyrocket.If we banned all guns
Not after we shoot a few thousand of them, for not being in uniform and just having a gun. See how that works now, Skippy?
Doesnt matter. There are people, some of them powerful, who do want to ban all guns.
But even those claiming they dont, we know what happens. They start with gun restriction. Then there's an incident. So they increase restrictions. Another incident. More restrictions. Another incident. Until finally the only solution is a ban or its equivalent. This is exactly what happened in Germany through the 1970s and on.
It certainly does matter because you're trying to demagogue the issue by constructing a strawman of totally banning guns that has no place in a real world discussion of gun control.
The Supreme Court struck down the Chicago handgun ban as a violation of the 2nd Amendment. Nobody is going to get a ban past that, and the Supreme Court is not about to reverse it, now or in the future.
And the alternative, repealing the 2nd amendment, is an absurdity.
2.4 million hits on the search "repeal the second amendment." Yeah, tell me no one is pushing for this. That includes articles by law professors, btw.
So there are people who want to, Repeal the 2A, ban all guns, impose "reasonable restrictions" on gun owners. And not one of those things will do anything to stop gun violence. Not one.
It certainly does matter because you're trying to demagogue the issue by constructing a strawman of totally banning guns that has no place in a real world discussion of gun control.
The Supreme Court struck down the Chicago handgun ban as a violation of the 2nd Amendment. Nobody is going to get a ban past that, and the Supreme Court is not about to reverse it, now or in the future.
And the alternative, repealing the 2nd amendment, is an absurdity.
2.4 million hits on the search "repeal the second amendment." Yeah, tell me no one is pushing for this. That includes articles by law professors, btw.
So there are people who want to, Repeal the 2A, ban all guns, impose "reasonable restrictions" on gun owners. And not one of those things will do anything to stop gun violence. Not one.
Stop. There is no chance the 2nd amendment will be repealed, and thus there is no chance all guns will be banned.
We know who has the guns, you buy bullets. In that case, if you didn't turn them in, we blow your house up. See ya.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
We know who has the guns, you buy bullets. In that case, if you didn't turn them in, we blow your house up. See ya.
At least 100 million people own firearms, if only 1 percent resist that is 1 million armed people, the army is not big enough.
I don't need an army, I need GPS. You brought at AR-15 to drone fight. Good luck with that.
........
2.4 million hits on the search "repeal the second amendment." Yeah, tell me no one is pushing for this. That includes articles by law professors, btw.
So there are people who want to, Repeal the 2A, ban all guns, impose "reasonable restrictions" on gun owners. And not one of those things will do anything to stop gun violence. Not one.
Stop. There is no chance the 2nd amendment will be repealed, and thus there is no chance all guns will be banned.
No, they will just keep whittling away at what gun we can own, until we are down to .22 smart guns that can be jammed at will. Of course the police will not restrict themselves to the same weapons.
Stop. There is no chance the 2nd amendment will be repealed, and thus there is no chance all guns will be banned.
No, they will just keep whittling away at what gun we can own, until we are down to .22 smart guns that can be jammed at will. Of course the police will not restrict themselves to the same weapons.
'They' couldn't even get a background check loophole closing past the Senate, and you people wallowing in paranoia think 'they' are going to ban guns wholesale?
Nonsense.
I'm okay with banning nearly all of them, and if you have one and aren't in uniform, we shoot you dead no questions asked. Problem solved.OK. let's say the Diane Feinsteins of the world got their wish and the US imposed a total ban on guns, no private citizen was allowed to own one. I realize the Supreme Court made that impossible, but let's say it's wet dream week at the DNC.
Then what?
The civil disobesdiance would make Prohibition look like child's play. If the gov't tried to enforce the edict going to house to house they would have a rebellion of major proportions in many places. Sure, not in Commieformia, where men are limp dicks. But in more rural areas, forget it. There isn't an army big enough to enforce that.
OK, so let's say we simply enacted "common sense" gun control like they want. Basically a re-enactment of the Assault Weapons Ban and other provisions like registration of guns, no private sales, etc.
We know what the old AWB did. Nothing. OK, not nothing It drove up the price of hi cap mags and pre ban weapons. It sure didnt stop a single shooting or crime. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result.
There are over 300M guns in this country. The genie is not going back in the bottle.
nice rant. but who wants to ban all guns? i just don't want them in the hands of criminals and crazies.... like most normal people.
...................... and 
No, they will just keep whittling away at what gun we can own, until we are down to .22 smart guns that can be jammed at will. Of course the police will not restrict themselves to the same weapons.
'They' couldn't even get a background check loophole closing past the Senate, and you people wallowing in paranoia think 'they' are going to ban guns wholesale?
Nonsense.
The control battle is in the states now. Jersey has a law on the books stating that if smart guns become a reality they would be the only gun purchasable by people. NY passed the unconstitutional SAFE act, and local courts are just letting it go by.
Bans may not be de jure, but in some localities we are getting to the point that they are de facto. Every part of NYC's gun laws are designed to make it difficult for ANYONE to get a permit for a gun.
We know who has the guns, you buy bullets. In that case, if you didn't turn them in, we blow your house up. See ya.
Say "Hello" to my little friend.
We know who has the guns, you buy bullets. In that case, if you didn't turn them in, we blow your house up. See ya.
Say "Hello" to my little friend.
good for you
i have a Dillon XL650
fantastic outfit.
OK. let's say the Diane Feinsteins of the world got their wish and the US imposed a total ban on guns, no private citizen was allowed to own one. I realize the Supreme Court made that impossible, but let's say it's wet dream week at the DNC.
Then what?
The civil disobesdiance would make Prohibition look like child's play. If the gov't tried to enforce the edict going to house to house they would have a rebellion of major proportions in many places. Sure, not in Commieformia, where men are limp dicks. But in more rural areas, forget it. There isn't an army big enough to enforce that.
OK, so let's say we simply enacted "common sense" gun control like they want. Basically a re-enactment of the Assault Weapons Ban and other provisions like registration of guns, no private sales, etc.
We know what the old AWB did. Nothing. OK, not nothing It drove up the price of hi cap mags and pre ban weapons. It sure didnt stop a single shooting or crime. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result.
There are over 300M guns in this country. The genie is not going back in the bottle.
It's amazing the fantasies you people indulge about the left. There's reality about the left, and theres the reality you wish was true Rabbi. It really simplifies your understanding about things doesn't it? It makes it easy for you to demonize those who have different political beliefs from you doesn't it?
NO ONE IMPORTANT wants to ban ALL guns. No democrat in office wants to repeal the 2nd amendment. None of them. Many democrats are gun owners themselves.
