So, Correll, labeling America as a Christian Nation is just an empty gesture, without any practical bearing on anyone's life?#818 reply to #812
YOur pretense that you are confused by the difference between an Established Church and a Christian Nation i
Iām not confused.
Here is why. Iām presenting only facts. You donāt have much of a record trying to challenge my facts. The members of the Constitutional Convention were not all Christians. Some were Deist, some were Unitarian, some represented colonies that had established Protestant Christian churches. Some represented colonies that did not have established churches. Etc etc etc.
#818 POINT 1 . At this point they represented the Continental Congress that acted exactly like a government.
#818 POINT 2 They were united in Revolution against monarchy. They were NOT united in any universal belief in Jesus Christ being the only Son of God, born of the Virgin Mary , died on the criss to eradicate mankindās original sin, resurrected and ascended into heaven waiting to come again to reign in a Kingdom here on earth.
But first we must squash your habit of setting up lies to support your grand lie.
You started with:
āIn the definition of the word, "Nation". a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.
and you set up your lie here. I bolded the lie.
āNation is "a large body of people.." That is how the definition of the word "nation" opens. It then discusses how that body of people might be united into a group, and at no point does it even reference the government, as one of those forces.ā
It didnāt take much to find a definition that does:
noun. noun. /ĖneÉŖŹn/ 1[countable] a country considered as a group of people with the same language, culture, and history, who live in a particular area under one government an independent nation the African nations.*1 The Continental Congress had no explicit legal authority to govern, but it assumed all the functions of a national government, such as appointing ambassadors, signing treaties, raising armies, appointing generals, obtaining loans from Europe, issuing paper money (called "Continentals"), and disbursing funds.
So do you concede that your definition of āgovernment-less nation is pure bullshit? And do you admit that Point #818 1 and 2 above are correct?
I do not concede anything. Even in the definition you found that references government, the nation is still defined as the GROUP OF PEOPLE, not the government that they are "under".
Also, I never claimed, nor does my position require that ALL the founders were Christians. That has been clear. Drop the strawman shit. When you play that game, you admit that you have nothing.
Celebrating our heritage, with Pride and Patriotism, is not an empty gesture.
But I would not expect a liberal to understand that.