Eight point turnaround, for Hillary Clinton, ten days

Trump's loss would be a tragic loss to western values... welcome to banana-republic.
 
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.
 
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.
If you believe that, which you should have learned that mistake when Romney got spanked, you are out of your mind. The polling isn't wrong, Trump is.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
 
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Just like with Romney.....Right?
 
Three points is a virtual tie, dope. LOL
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Reuters got popped for it last week
 
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Just like with Romney.....Right?
The Romney landslide is now the Trump landslide. These people never learn.
 
Three points is a virtual tie, dope. LOL
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Reuters got popped for it last week
Three is perfectly fine. It will probably end up, in the popular vote which doesn't matter, 53-47 for Clinton.
 
Three points is a virtual tie, dope. LOL
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Reuters got popped for it last week
Three is perfectly fine. It will probably end up, in the popular vote which doesn't matter, 53-47 for Clinton.

Meh...go attempt to snow someone else. I don't trust polls. That one last week saying Clinton won the debate....then the demos reveal 40% of the respondents didn't see the debate or saw clips. Worthless but you window lickers peed all over yourselves at the "news"
 
I guess the debate and a few dozen other Trump fails had some legs:

White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Hate to break it to you but in actuality these numbers show she's down by at least 2 points. Most polls BEFORE the debate (Ramussen included) were sampling Dems +0 some were at +2-4. Polls post debate are sampling Dems +10.

It's all a game. They'll continue to fuck with the sampling all the way until the election to sucker the suckers into believing Clinton holds the lead.

Just like with Romney.....Right?
Wrong....the polling with Romney was on the up. They didn't fuck with the sampling so wildly as they are doing now.

Why do you think Trump was supposedly closing in on Hillary as the debate drew near? They were sampling Dems on average at +2 which was down from +14 in some polls.
 

Forum List

Back
Top