Watch Trump reverse Biden's dumpster-fire economy, and then watch Dems try to take credit for the success

[Captain Caveman]

You are incorrect. There will be jobs ost by people who have products or services the people you mention purchase.

My post should have been$1.2trillion.

Which products and services? But just think of all the jobs when Trump boots the illegals out. Just asking, don't get upset, are you on that list?

 

[struth]

At a certain point trump owns the failure he left for Biden. Biden has created the number one economy on earth at this time. That's what he owns.

He left xiden three vaccines, folks pouring back to work, and a virus that was under control

Xiden undid all those things, gave us record Covid deaths, and destroyed the economy

 

[Mac1958]

We will benchmark the Biden economy and compare it to the Trump economy.
Below are current figures on the economy. We will compare these measures in 1 year.
4.2% unemployment
GDP -30.8 trillion
GDP growth 2.8
Inflation 2.8%
Exports Oct 265.7 trillion
Imports Oct 339.7 trillion
Consumer spending + .5% growth
Wealth distribution - possibly the most importny measure. we need to close the gap between the rich and poor
In the second quarter of 2024, the top 10% of households owned 67% of the total household wealth, while the bottom 50% owned 2.5%. The top 10% had an average of $6.9 million in wealth, while the bottom 50% had an average of $51,000.

Good idea, but it won't matter. Anything he does will be beloved and defended, and any bad future numbers will be Biden's fault.

They actually think he's going to reverse prices. They really think the economy is horrible.

 

[hadit]

Like I said, it’s hard for people to be rational about the economy.

hadit has proven they can’t be. The vast majority of republicans can’t.

Now, that's poor form, talking about me as if I'm not right here. Obviously, you've not read much of what I post because I illustrate absurdity by being absurd, it's a classic tactic. Now, since you want to be rational, what shall we discuss? Do you want to talk about the roles of overspending, the debt load, and the tax structure in the performance of the economy? Perhaps the ever-growing government bureaucracy that always needs more taken from the economy, or the duplication of federal agencies that end up overlapping in their responsibilities the additive effect of their increasing budgets? Should we discuss the role of short-term stimuli on the long-term performance of the economy? Maybe baseline budgeting?

 

[Marener]

Now, that's poor form, talking about me as if I'm not right here. Obviously, you've not read much of what I post because I illustrate absurdity by being absurd, it's a classic tactic. Now, since you want to be rational, what shall we discuss? Do you want to talk about the roles of overspending, the debt load, and the tax structure in the performance of the economy? Perhaps the ever-growing government bureaucracy that always needs more taken from the economy, or the duplication of federal agencies that end up overlapping in their responsibilities the additive effect of their increasing budgets? Should we discuss the role of short-term stimuli on the long-term performance of the economy? Maybe baseline budgeting?

lol, look at you trying to sound rational.

We know that partisanship has a huge role in how people think the economy is doing. It happens in both sides but the effect is more pronounced among Republicans.

Republican voters view economy through partisan-colored glasses

It’s beyond doubt that partisanship plays a key role in what people tell pollsters about the economy.

www.msnbc.com

Weren’t you one of the partisans that was gleefully trying to tell everyone there was a recession in 2022?

 

[initforme]

If wage increases are part of the plan the nation will be on board, big time.

 

[Delldude]

If wage increases are part of the plan the nation will be on board, big time.

California doing it's part, that law they passed for the $20 minimum wage has resulted in over 6000 people losing their jobs.

Off to a great start.

 

[hadit]

lol, look at you trying to sound rational.

We know that partisanship has a huge role in how people think the economy is doing. It happens in both sides but the effect is more pronounced among Republicans.

Republican voters view economy through partisan-colored glasses

It’s beyond doubt that partisanship plays a key role in what people tell pollsters about the economy.

www.msnbc.com

Weren’t you one of the partisans that was gleefully trying to tell everyone there was a recession in 2022?

Wasn't that when the democrats were trying to redefine what a recession is to avoid saying there was one going on? At any rate, now you're running away from a rational discussion. Why is that?

 

[Marener]

Wasn't that when the democrats were trying to redefine what a recession is to avoid saying there was one going on? At any rate, now you're running away from a rational discussion. Why is that?

It wasn’t. It was when you didn’t know what the definition of a recession is and despite being shown proof that you were wrong, continued to believe what you wanted to believe. There was no recession in 2022, no matter how badly you wanted there to be one.

This shows your irrationality. You reject facts in favor of narrative.

It’s common in both parties, but when it comes to economics, Republicans are especially bad.

 

[hadit]

It wasn’t. It was when you didn’t know what the definition of a recession is and despite being shown proof that you were wrong, continued to believe what you wanted to believe. There was no recession in 2022, no matter how badly you wanted there to be one.

This shows your irrationality. You reject facts in favor of narrative.

It’s common in both parties, but when it comes to economics, Republicans are especially bad.

Yet again you won't discuss any of the topics I raised, instead worrying about the redefinition of a recession from 2 years ago. And you had me thinking you might actually want a rational economic discussion. You don't.

 

[Marener]

Yet again you won't discuss any of the topics I raised, instead worrying about the redefinition of a recession from 2 years ago. And you had me thinking you might actually want a rational economic discussion. You don't.

The question is whether you are capable of rational conversation. I have ample reason to doubt this.

 

[hadit]

The question is whether you are capable of rational conversation. I have ample reason to doubt this.

I work with what I'm given. If you give me rational discourse, you get it back. Go irrational, as you have been, and you don't. I am absurd to illustrate absurdity.

 

[IM2]

If wage increases are part of the plan the nation will be on board, big time.

Wages increased durng Biden.

 

[jc456]

Watch Trump reverse Biden's dumpster-fire economy, and then watch Dems try to take credit for the success​

When Trump brings the economy back from the brink, Biden and his Democrat allies will deserve no credit​

Watch Trump reverse Biden's dumpster-fire economy, and then watch Dems try to take credit for the success

Trump will free America’s economy from Biden’s regulatory nightmare to encourage economic growth and domestic energy production, meaningfully reducing government overreach and lowering energy costs.

www.foxnews.com

6 Dec 2024 ~~ Andy Puzder

Democrats have no equals when it comes to taking undeserved credit and evading well-deserved blame. Consider a recent Time article titled "Don’t Give Trump Credit for the success of the Biden Economy." Of course, no one, including President-elect Trump, wants credit for Biden’s dumpster fire economy. That debacle just cost the Democrats an election. 
So, what is Time’s piece all about? Well, it is part of an effort to position Democrats to take credit for what even they see as Trump’s coming economic turnaround.
It’s not the first time Democrats have tried to take credit for Trump’s economic success.
~Snip~
In three years, America’s economy went from stagnating to thriving precisely because Trump reversed virtually every one of Obama’s stifling big government policies and adopted energizing free market policies. Obama nonetheless attempted to claim credit for that success. 
NBC News, among other legacy media sources, predictably ran a piece supporting this notion claiming that "Trump didn’t build a great economy he inherited it."
So, here we go again.
~Snip~
As a result, four years later, Biden is handing over an economy encumbered by an astounding record high debt of over $36 trillion and a record high annual deficit of $1.8 trillion. And the damage isn’t done. Recently, in just over the last 100 days, the federal debt soared an additional $1 trillion.
There are consequences for that kind of fiscal irresponsibility and both working- and middle-class Americans are suffering those consequences.
~Snip~
Obviously, we don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. We need to meaningfully reduce spending while we simultaneously increase tax revenue through economic growth.
To accomplish those goals, Trump will undo Biden’s economic policies as he did Obama’s.
To continue increasing tax revenue, Trump will keep the current low rates in place and selectively reduce rates to further encourage economic growth. This worked for Presidents Kennedy, Reagan and Trump (in his first term). It’s the plan for his second term, and it will work – again.

Commentary:
It's obvious that even before Trump has taken his oath of office once again that the economy is responding positively.
Buden's "Bidenomics" has resulted in inflation and massive spending that cannot be tolerated.
There's no doubt that Neo-Marxist Democrats will claim Trump inherited their peace dividend too. One would have to ask what Peace?
The only commonality for the Neo- Marxists is "Hatred". Hatred for Christians, hatred for America, hatred for Jews, hatred for Israel. hatred for MAGA's and especially hatred for DJT.

yep, you know it's a coming.

 

[jc456]

Wages increased durng Biden.

how did that happen when he illegally brought in 12 million illegals who work for dimes?

 

[jc456]

You are incorrect. There will be jobs ost by people who have products or services the people you mention purchase.

where's you receipt?

 

[jc456]

Actually Biden set a record excluding the jobs that were here during the pandemic. But you want to give trump credit for jobs before the pandemic but make excuses for he jobs he lost during the pandemic.

post a receipt cuck

 

[jc456]

Actually Biden set a record excluding the jobs that were here during the pandemic. But you want to give trump credit for jobs before the pandemic but make excuses for he jobs he lost during the pandemic.

naw, here's the report, 22 million lost at pandemic, 40% were recovered before joe, so joe only gets a few million since over 11 million were recovery jobs. oops!

Biden's Misleading Claims About the Economic Recovery and Unemployment - FactCheck.org

When President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan into law in March 2021, U.S. gross domestic product had increased for three quarters straight, and the unemployment rate had decreased nearly nine percentage points from its pandemic peak. But Biden wrongly credited the Democratic COVID-19...

www.factcheck.org

The U.S. economy lost nearly 22 million jobs at the start of the pandemic, when large parts of the economy shut down. By the time Biden took office, over 40% of those jobs still had not come back, BLS data show. So there was a lot of room for growth.

It was not until August that total nonfarm employment finally surpassed the pre-pandemic high of 152.5 million, according to the BLS’ preliminary figures.

 

[Marener]

I work with what I'm given. If you give me rational discourse, you get it back. Go irrational, as you have been, and you don't. I am absurd to illustrate absurdity.

An irrational person can’t tell the difference between rational and irrational discourse.

They do not perceive their own irrationality. They can’t.

It’s absurd to believe a falsehood after being shown it’s false, yet that’s what you do.

 

[hadit]

An irrational person can’t tell the difference between rational and irrational discourse.

They do not perceive their own irrationality. They can’t.

It’s absurd to believe a falsehood after being shown it’s false, yet that’s what you do.

What exactly did I say about a recession in 2022? Did I cite the commonly held opinion that two consecutive quarters of negative growth constitutes a recession? If that's what I said, you're basically arguing that Dan Quayle didn't know how to spell because he used a valid spelling of potato.

Now, which of the topics I proposed do you wish to discuss? Last chance. Ignore this and I'll go back to illustrating absurdity by being absurd.