FOIA Reveals Long-Hidden Transcript of Pres. Obama Talking to Progressive Media About the Trump-Russia Fraud Story 3 Days Before Trump 2017 Inaugurati

[hadit]

Biden is still president.

In a few months, people will miss him badly.

I'm sure all five of them will have the sadz, but then pudding!

 

[JoeB131]

To old? He was running and got all the votes, you all dropped him only after trump destroyed him in the debate

He was running unopposed, as almost every incumbent does.

You see, not being a partisan robot, I can admit that this was a mistake. Biden should have stepped aside and let Harris and whoever else contend for the nomination.

But don't pretend a 50.7% win against a crippled candidate is any kind of mandate. It isn't.

 

[struth]

He was running unopposed, as almost every incumbent does.

You see, not being a partisan robot, I can admit that this was a mistake. Biden should have stepped aside and let Harris and whoever else contend for the nomination.

But don't pretend a 50.7% win against a crippled candidate is any kind of mandate. It isn't.

why was he running unopposed?

Oh it's a mandate, crossed the EC, overwhelming won the popular vote, by millions, massive gains from your old base, took the Senate, and maintained the house

It's a mandate against demafacism

 

[JoeB131]

why was he running unopposed?

Same reason Trump ran unopposed in 2020
Or Obama did in 2012
Or Bush did in 2004
Or clinton did in 1996.

Oh it's a mandate, crossed the EC, overwhelming won the popular vote,

50.7% is not overwhelming.

That is actually the worst performance by an incumbent president seeking re-election since 1912 without a third-party challenger.

 

[Hollie]

President Obama was correct, in hindsight, to warn anyone who would listen about the now-proven Trump-Russia collusion.

You just can't let go of your Russia -Trump conspiracy theories.

 

[struth]

Same reason Trump ran unopposed in 2020
Or Obama did in 2012
Or Bush did in 2004
Or clinton did in 1996.



50.7% is not overwhelming.

That is actually the worst performance by an incumbent president seeking re-election since 1912 without a third-party challenger.

They had primaries and werent senile.

Trump isn’t trump trump he incumbent president. Harris was in fact the incumbent VP.

And 50.7 is the final number that’s just where it is now

 

[Doc7505]

Very sad to see these demafacist leaders undermine our democracy

But today is the day that america takes our country back

~~~~~~
Unfortunately, the Neo-Marxists call it "Politics", while the majority of Americans consider it "Sedition"

 

[JoeB131]

They had primaries and werent senile.

Trump isn’t trump trump he incumbent president. Harris was in fact the incumbent VP.

And 50.7 is the final number that’s just where it is now

They had primaries but were unopposed.

When Trump was the incumbent, he ran unopposed. (No, Batshit Joe Walsh doesn't count). Same with every other incumbent president after 1992.

50.7 is probably not going to be the final number. Only 60% of the return is in from CA, and most of that from Urban areas. That will probably add another 2 million or so votes to Harris's total, and will close the gap to probably 50.2 or so.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

It wasn't harder for me, but I'm sure that it was harder for a lot of people who couldn't get time off, or couldn't mail in a ballot because mail-in balloting was restricted this time.

And they couldn't take an hour or two off of work because Biden had the economy so bad they would starve .

 

[JoeB131]

And they couldn't take an hour or two off of work because Biden had the economy so bad they would starve .

Don't be an idiot.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Don't be an idiot.

I am certainly not a Democrat. How dare you!

 

[JoeB131]

I am certainly not a Democrat. How dare you!

Proof you are an idiot.

If you aren't rich, you have to be an idiot to vote Republican.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Nope, nowhere near.

Last time, Biden got 81 million votes and Trump got 74.

As it stands right now, Harris has 68 million and Trump got 72. That means that 15 million less people voted this time than last time. I put in the Caveat that they haven't finished counting yet in the west. So we aren't going to get final vote number until the end of the week, but these numbers will only go up by few million (and will probably put Harris closer because they are mostly Urban votes)

The electorate grows by about 3% per cycle. If voter turnout had stayed the same, then we'd have 160 million votes, not the 140 million we have so far.

Right now, it's slightly less than four million votes fewer votes cast this election than in 2020.

 

[JoeB131]

Right now, it's slightly less than four million votes fewer votes cast this election than in 2020.

Well, given the electorate grew by 12 million and the number of eligible voters by 4 million, a loss of that many votes is kind of a big deal.

Turnout of the VEP dropped by 2.1%. Turnout by the voter age population dropped by 4%

Trump's margin was only 1.58% over Harris, this is not a mandate. It's actually one of the weakest performances by a second-term president in history.

 

[SweetTea]

Well, given the electorate grew by 12 million and the number of eligible voters by 4 million, a loss of that many votes is kind of a big deal.

Turnout of the VEP dropped by 2.1%. Turnout by the voter age population dropped by 4%

Trump's margin was only 1.58% over Harris, this is not a mandate. It's actually one of the weakest performances by a second-term president in history.

Nobody gives a crap whether you lemmings think he has a mandate or not. He won the electoral college, the House, the Senate and the popular vote. He can now do what he was elected by the majority to do...fix the mess that Democrats have caused over the last couple of decades. Between the lawfare of Democrats during his first term and the fact that he wasn't a politician, he didn't clean house at that time. It appears as though he has learned his lesson. We can only hope that he rids our government of woke nut cases and policies that cater to that crowd. Either way, you have no say. Thank goodness.

 

[JoeB131]

Nobody gives a crap whether you lemmings think he has a mandate or not. He won the electoral college, the House, the Senate and the popular vote. He can now do what he was elected by the majority to do...fix the mess that Democrats have caused over the last couple of decades. Between the lawfare of Democrats during his first term and the fact that he wasn't a politician, he didn't clean house at that time. It appears as though he has learned his lesson. We can only hope that he rids our government of woke nut cases and policies that cater to that crowd. Either way, you have no say. Thank goodness.

Yeah, guy, you are going to be disappointed.

Every president threatens to "clean house" and they all end up leaving Washington and the bureaucracy is still intact.

You guys have two years before people get sick of Trump's shit and give Congress back to the Democrats. And that assumes Republicans don't look at his sinking poll numbers and realize they can work with President Vance.

 

[SweetTea]

Yeah, guy, you are going to be disappointed.

Only if he doesn't go far enough, which is always a possibility.

What you fail to grasp is that if he does cut like he should and rid the swamp of most of it's most dangerous creatures, the House and the Senate won't flip in 2026. Normal people, not you, will be very happy with the results on many different levels.

 

[JoeB131]

Only if he doesn't go far enough, which is always a possibility.

What you fail to grasp is that if he does cut like he should and rid the swamp of most of it's most dangerous creatures, the House and the Senate won't flip in 2026. Normal people, not you, will be very happy with the results on many different levels.

Here's the problem, guy. Most middle America doesn't give a **** about "the swamp".

They care that Nana's Medicare arrives on time. They care that that dangerous overpass gets fixed. And when that doesn't happen (and it won't) they are going to be pretty upset with the GOP.

Again, I point out 2004, where Bush barely squeaked by to re-election over Kerry, and thought he had a mandate.

Two years later, he lost the House and Senate by big numbers.

 

[SweetTea]

Here's the problem, guy. Most middle America doesn't give a **** about "the swamp".

They care that Nana's Medicare arrives on time. They care that that dangerous overpass gets fixed. And when that doesn't happen (and it won't) they are going to be pretty upset with the GOP.

Again, I point out 2004, where Bush barely squeaked by to re-election over Kerry, and thought he had a mandate.

Two years later, he lost the House and Senate by big numbers.

I think you fail to realize just how much waste there is in government. Billions can be cut and the things you mentioned will still be available.

 

[JoeB131]

I think you fail to realize just how much waste there is in government. Billions can be cut and the things you mentioned will still be available.

Again, any large organization is going to have waste. And when you go for massive cuts, you tend to eliminate things that are good before you get to the stuff that is bad.

of the 7 Trillion we spend every year, 5 Trillion are Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Defense, and Interest on the Debt. We simply have little to no flexibility on those.