No, the Bible says nothing against baptizing babies and indicates approval. That has been shown numerous times.
No, it hasn't. But if that's the case, please give an example of infant baptism in the bible. And please back yourself up scripturally that the bible indicates approval of it.
We have posted truckloads of scriptures showing that water baptism is tied to belief and repentance.
Further, the Bible also states the Holy Spirit blows where it wills--it takes no magic words from a human to start the Holy Spirit in motion.
Yes, of course, no one has denied that. But you're doing something you do a lot, I've noticed. You take a scripture that is speaking about something, and then try to tie it to an entirely different matter, to back up RCC teachings.
Yes, of course God starts the process. But that doesn't mean salvation is automatic. That's not the way it works.
I mean, let's use some common sense here.
Someone who is baptized as a baby can (and often does) later, when they're older, totally reject God. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins were baptized as a baby. Does that make them saved? People who devote their life to rejecting God and trying to get others to reject God?
I think what has become clear is that you have a wrong understanding of what it means to be saved. I know that some non-Catholic Christians here (maybe Carl) might disagree with me on this, but when you're truly saved, you're saved.
You go from death to life. You don't go back and forth. It's a one-time thing... that's what the very word "saved" indicates, or else the word itself wouldn't make sense.
Like a newborn baby cannot go back into the womb, a person who is born spiritually cannot go back to being unborn.
You cannot lose your salvation.
Now I know what the response to this is going to be, by the people who don't believe this. But for the sake of time, I'm not going to preemptively reply to the usual arguments, but I will later, if this discussion is still going and if time permits.
When one is baptized, one also receives the Holy Spirit, and thus regeneration (Catholics say 'sanctification') begins. Those non-Catholic Christians who want their children to wait, can have their children wait. While Catholics may not follow along, we do understand your reasoning, and are puzzled by the refusal to understand ours.
You are making the decision for someone else. That is not how it works. Each person has to receive the gift by their OWN decision. Not their parents.
Let me ask you this. If you really believe that infant baptism is that baby getting saved by the Holy Spirit, then what about the millions (or billions) of babies who don't get baptized? Are they unsaved? If those non-Catholic babies die, do they go to heaven, in your view?
See, this is what I meant when I said the Catholic idea on salvation is completely different than the Christian view. And that is why I have stated that we belong to two different religions.