Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 138,248
- 29,206
- 2,180
Were YOU born or "plopped"?The topic was someone coming here and plopping a peep ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were YOU born or "plopped"?The topic was someone coming here and plopping a peep ...
And? Do you think that illegal aliens never conceive and birth children here in the US?The topic was someone coming here ..... on US soil...you miss that?
Framer intent…and that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means a child can not owe allegiance to another nation (dual citizenship)What would be the SC's argument to negate birthright citizenship?
Many believe the Constitution has been grossly misinterpreted for decades. Are you saying they will finally properly interpret the 14th?They will rule in favor of the Constitution.
About 7 million Americans have dual citizenship.... a child can not owe allegiance to another nation (dual citizenship)
...
In theory an 'illegal' shouldn't be here that long.And? Do you think that illegal aliens never conceive and birth children here in the US?
I don't remember....Were YOU born or "plopped"?
Of course they do. The question is whether they should be granted US citizenshipAnd? Do you think that illegal aliens never conceive and birth children here in the US?
Those issued a stolen citizenship gained through illegal means were plopped as they are second class….Legit real Americans were born.Were YOU born or "plopped"?
Illegals?About 7 million Americans have dual citizenship.
The 14th amendment wasn’t written by the framers. It was written post civil war.It all lies in the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” and in Framer intent.
How will this Trump SCOTUS translate the phrase and what will they think the Framers intent was.
Well then…They are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.About 7 million Americans have dual citizenship.
Are you confusing Founders with Framers?The 14th amendment wasn’t written by the framers. It was written post civil war.
If your parents are subject to deportation due to being here illegally why would their child be granted citizenship?They don't. Just the US citizen, unless the deported family chooses to take him with them.
Why because Unkotare gets paid to rob taxpayers and ‘teach’ Mexico’s parasites of course. His mortgage doesn’t get paid if alien enemies aren’t breaking in and birthing parasites. Why else?If your parents are subject to deportation due to being here illegally why would their child be granted citizenship?
And yet they often are.In theory an 'illegal' shouldn't be here that long.
...
What happened to due process?And yet they often are.
What’s the statute of limitations on illegal aliens?And yet they often are.
I 100% totally agree with you…There’s no way in hell 14:1 as practiced makes any sense to anyone not named Humberto and or not a globalist wacko with cash on the line like UnkotareHonestly, I've listened to all of the historical arguments by the experts and I don't see how the SCOTUS cannot rule in Trump's favor.
Children of non-citizens are clearly not included nor ever intended by the founders to be citizens.
I would go back to every anchor baby of the last ten years and kick them all out.
Democrats have for years tried to engineer a soft coup takeover from within.
That is the question. As of this very moment, they ARE. Every bit as much as you or me.Of course they do. The question is whether they should be granted US citizenship