Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) on Supreme Court: "It is a corrupt court"

[berg80]

God, you're an idiot! Illinois was Gerrymandered LONG before Texas was!

Not at the direction of the prez, 4 years removed from the next census, for the purpose of stopping oversight of his, in large measure, illegal agenda. And for the purpose of avoiding congressional scrutiny of his unprecedented corruption.

 

[struth]

Not at the direction of the prez, 4 years removed from the next census, for the purpose of stopping oversight of his, in large measure, illegal agenda. And for the purpose of avoiding congressional scrutiny of his unprecedented corruption.

Ill just did it to surpress voters and for Demafacist to maintain power…IL historically has one of the of most corrupt govts in history

A Short History of Corruption in Illinois

Stories of corruption amongst politicians in Illinois and Chicago could fill a book—and they have. As federal investigations close in on some of the state's most powerful people, revisit the last half century or so of corruption in the city and state.

www.wttw.com

Corruption in Illinois - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So, sorry if reality shows your post to be full of projection

 

[Rawley]

Built in 1922 on soft soil, the pool has suffered from cracking and sinking.

Why the sudden urgency?

We have a big birthday party in two months Rachel hasn't mentioned this?

 

[struth]

We have a big birthday party in two months Rachel hasn't mentioned this?

postman apparently we shouldn’t clean our pool out after 250 years and it’s corrupt to

 

[postman]

Becuse not many do.

Now you are saying Supreme Court? Not every state calls these trial court a Supreme Court, and not 24

To make it uniform. There are 24 states that give the selection of the justices to their highest court to the people, by direct election.

 

[postman]

Becuse not many do.

As of 2026, over 30 states use some form of popular election to select or retain justices for their highest courts, allowing the public a direct voice in judicial selection. These methods range from explicitly partisan contests to nonpartisan elections and retention votes

 

[berg80]

As of 2026, over 30 states use some form of popular election to select or retain justices for their highest courts, allowing the public a direct voice in judicial selection. These methods range from explicitly partisan contests to nonpartisan elections and retention votes

AI Overview

Most candidates for state supreme court are affiliated with or strongly supported by the Republican or Democratic parties, even in states that officially label their elections "nonpartisan".

 

[struth]

To make it uniform. There are 24 states that give the selection of the justices to their highest court to the people, by direct election.

No there isn’t

I tell you what list them

 

[struth]

As of 2026, over 30 states use some form of popular election to select or retain justices for their highest courts, allowing the public a direct voice in judicial selection. These methods range from explicitly partisan contests to nonpartisan elections and retention votes

I think all 50 do…actually 51 when the federal court does…geez how far you gonna move rhr goal post?

 

[postman]

States with Partisan Election of Supreme Court Justices (2026)In these states, candidates for the Supreme Court run with a party affiliation (Democrat or Republican) listed on the ballot.
Alabama
Illinois
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
North Carolina
Ohio
Texas
Pennsylvania

States with Nonpartisan Election of Supreme Court Justices (2026)Candidates in these states appear on the ballot without a party label,

Arkansas
Georgia
Idaho
Michigan (Uses a unique system
Minnesota
Montana
Nevada
North Dakota
Oregon
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

 

[postman]

I rarely see a Super Mike cour change their mind every other day

That's because of Stare Decisis

Duh !!!!

Otherwise they could reverse themselves based on the time of day.

 

[struth]

That's because of Stare Decisis

Duh !!!!

Otherwise they could reverse themselves based on the time of day.

No they wouldn’t

Seriously, people that study the law normally agree on the law

It’s very rare they don’t

Hence why only about 70 cases actually reach the scotus a year

And then maybe once in a generation doesn’t the court reverse a prior ruling (that’s cause of SD) but when the do, it’s right

The left loves SD, if Dems had their way plessy would still be the law of the land, thankfully some Conservatives goes on the bench and we got brown v board of education…a direct reversal

This court has rarely done that.

 

[postman]

postman apparently we shouldn’t clean our pool out after 250 years and it’s corrupt to

No, it's corrupt to give a no-bid contract to his pool guy, based on deciding to paint the pool, two months before the USA's 250th birthday that Trump knew about on day one.

 

[postman]

No they wouldn’t

Seriously, people that study the law normally agree on the law

It’s very rare they don’t

Hence why only about 70 cases actually reach the scotus a year

And then maybe once in a generation doesn’t the court reverse a prior ruling (that’s cause of SD) but when the do, it’s right

The left loves SD, if Dems had their way plessy would still be the law of the land, thankfully some Conservatives goes on the bench and we got brown v board of education…a direct reversal

This court has rarely done that.

They overruled the judgment of 7 justices with the judgement of 6 justices.

 

[marvin martian]

Demafasict like Booker are attacking our democratic institutions amd are a clear and present danger to the republic

Heil Obama!

 

[M14 Shooter]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Democrats say whatever they believe they need to say to gain and retain as much political power as they can.
They know their useful idiots will mindlessly repeat their nonsense ad nauseam, and they know they can prey upon the emotions of the ignorant.

You need go no further than this message board for proof