Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) on Supreme Court: "It is a corrupt court"

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Cory Booker calls Supreme Court ‘profoundly hypocritical’ after voting rights ruling: Full interview

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joins Meet the Press after the U.S. Supreme Court imposed new limits on the Voting Rights Act and the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a new Democratic-leaning congressional map approved by voters.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Independent thinker]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Cory Booker calls Supreme Court ‘profoundly hypocritical’ after voting rights ruling: Full interview

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joins Meet the Press after the U.S. Supreme Court imposed new limits on the Voting Rights Act and the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a new Democratic-leaning congressional map approved by voters.

www.nbcnews.com

If democrats had their way, there would be no supreme court. You just take a poll and the majority rules.

 

[postman]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Cory Booker calls Supreme Court ‘profoundly hypocritical’ after voting rights ruling: Full interview

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joins Meet the Press after the U.S. Supreme Court imposed new limits on the Voting Rights Act and the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a new Democratic-leaning congressional map approved by voters.

www.nbcnews.com

What you fail to grasp is that Roberts and Alito have from early in their legal careers wanted to get rid of the voting rights act / roe v wade / etc.
And the rational behind doing so doesn't use prior law (stare decisis) or even a through legal analysis, but instead relies on their own judgement of the state of racism in America. Using the conclusion that racism no longer exists.

Thus the laws enacted by congress and signed into law, no longer have a compelling government interest, and violate the constitutions equal protection.
And adding a "dig" at the current deadlocked / do nothing congress said that those provisions of the voting rights act they are stripping from the legislation can be passed "anew" if they disagree that racism has been eliminated in America.

 

[the watcher]

If you are old enough and paid attention, you will remember when Thomas was being "questioned" by Joe (new hair plug) Biden and Ted (Hero of Chappaquiddick) Kennedy, two of the biggest horn dogs in the Senate on morals. Kennedy was sweating like a whore in church and Biden was salivating. What a clown show that was.

 

[WEATHER53]

When it does not go their way they tantrum and name call which is why these children must be dismissed from power

 

[Blaster]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Cory Booker calls Supreme Court ‘profoundly hypocritical’ after voting rights ruling: Full interview

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joins Meet the Press after the U.S. Supreme Court imposed new limits on the Voting Rights Act and the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a new Democratic-leaning congressional map approved by voters.

www.nbcnews.com

The Virginia failed gerrymander was ruled unconstitutional by the Virginia court and not by SCOTUS.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What you fail to grasp is that Roberts and Alito have from early in their legal careers wanted to get rid of the voting rights act / roe v wade / etc.
And the rational behind doing so doesn't use prior law (stare decisis) or even a through legal analysis, but instead relies on their own judgement of the state of racism in America. Using the conclusion that racism no longer exists.

Thus the laws enacted by congress and signed into law, no longer have a compelling government interest, and violate the constitutions equal protection.
And adding a "dig" at the current deadlocked / do nothing congress said that those provisions of the voting rights act they are stripping from the legislation can be passed "anew" if they disagree that racism has been eliminated in America.

What you fail to grasp is that Roberts and Alito have from early in their legal careers wanted to get rid of the voting rights act / roe v wade / etc.

I'm sure those weren't the only unconstitutional things they wanted to eliminate.

And the rational behind doing so doesn't use prior law (stare decisis)

Like Dred Scott or Plessy v. Ferguson?

 

[postman]

The Virginia failed gerrymander was ruled unconstitutional by the Virginia court and not by SCOTUS.

The gerrymander wasn't ruled unconstitutional. The procedures to bring about the vote were ruled unconstitutional.

The maps that were drawn would pass constitutional scritiny.

 

[Rawley]

It's ironic how throughout the 20th century when we saw radical decisions come out of SCOTUS that benefited the left's agenda Democrats never called the court corrupt or illegitimate (nor did the Republicans). Now that we have a court that rules the closest to the original intent of the Constitution in my lifetime it's suddenly corrupt and needs reformed. This is the same kind of rhetoric and proposed actions we see from far-left socialist regimes throughout the world. They get into power and install their own corrupt thugs to destroy the judicial and constitutional institutions to give them everything they want that they can't win through legitimate means.

Cory Booker calls Supreme Court ‘profoundly hypocritical’ after voting rights ruling: Full interview

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) joins Meet the Press after the U.S. Supreme Court imposed new limits on the Voting Rights Act and the Virginia Supreme Court overturned a new Democratic-leaning congressional map approved by voters.

www.nbcnews.com

Booker is a joke.

 

[postman]

What you fail to grasp is that Roberts and Alito have from early in their legal careers wanted to get rid of the voting rights act / roe v wade / etc.

I'm sure those weren't the only unconstitutional things they wanted to eliminate.

And the rational behind doing so doesn't use prior law (stare decisis)

Like Dred Scott or Plessy v. Ferguson?

Notice that in those decisions they convinced a greater number of justices, that the prior decision of the court was in error. Often getting the unanimous opinion of those making that judgement.

 

[Cassandro]

What you fail to grasp is that Roberts and Alito have from early in their legal careers wanted to get rid of the voting rights act / roe v wade / etc.

Irrelevant.

And the rational behind doing so doesn't use prior law (stare decisis)

Like Dredd Scott?

or even a through legal analysis,

Like the Constitution?

but instead relies on their own judgement of the state of racism in America.

Racism is an excuse for violating the Constitution.

Using the conclusion that racism no longer exists.

Straw Man argument.

 

[WEATHER53]

The gerrymander wasn't ruled unconstitutional. The procedures to bring about the vote were ruled unconstitutional.

The maps that were drawn would pass constitutional scritiny.

Yet it failed
Lib loons once again presenting “what if” as what is

 

[postman]

Irrelevant.

Like Dredd Scott?

Like the Constitution?

Racism is an excuse for violating the Constitution.

Straw Man argument.

Asked and answered

Notice that in those decisions they convinced a greater number of justices, that the prior decision of the court was in error. Often getting the unanimous opinion of those making that judgement.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Notice that in those decisions they convinced a greater number of justices, that the prior decision of the court was in error. Often getting the unanimous opinion of those making that judgement.

Some stare decisis is more equal than others?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

If democrats had their way, there would be no supreme court. You just take a poll and the majority rules.

Kind of.
If democrats had their way the supreme court justices would be voted in by the people, every 6 years, like senators.

 

[postman]

Yet it failed
Lib loons once again presenting “what if” as what is

Failure from an extraneous cause isn't a failure of the argument.

An example is when six senators tried to have the "Line Item Veto" ruled unconstitutional, they failed. Not by the argument, but because of something extraneous to the case. That they lacked "standing" to bring the case.

Ultimately, when a proper set of plaintiffs took the issue to court. The supreme court ruled on the merits, and threw out the line item veto as unconstitutional

 

[WEATHER53]

Failure from an extraneous cause isn't a failure of the argument.

An example is when six senators tried to have the "Line Item Veto" ruled unconstitutional, they failed. Not by the argument, but because of something extraneous to the case. That they lacked "standing" to bring the case.

Ultimately, when a proper set of plaintiffs took the issue to court. The supreme court ruled on the merits, and threw out the line item veto as unconstitutional

Your first sentence is gobbledegook and incorrect
The illegal package failed

 

[struth]

Demafasict like Booker are attacking our democratic institutions amd are a clear and present danger to the republic

 

[postman]

Some stare decisis is more equal than others?

When a more unified court determines that a less decisive decision was wrong, then it is correct to throw out the old judgement.

It's no different then when it happens to scientific theories or best practices. When you convince a greater number of scientists or doctors that the old theory or method was wrong, and more of them agree to replace, than had taken the opposite view, that new judgement was rightly made.

 

[postman]

Kind of.
If democrats had their way the supreme court justices would be voted in by the people, every 6 years, like senators.

Or like a large number of states do?