Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) on Supreme Court: "It is a corrupt court"

Ill just did it to surpress voters and for Demafacist to maintain power…IL historically has one of the of most corrupt govts in history



So, sorry if reality shows your post to be full of projection
Thinking and reality are the two greatest obstacles to lib loon scams
 
The practices of some members, notably Thomas, are corrupt. Worse still, the Court refuses to police itself in the absence of any governmental body having the power to do so.

As for the recent rulings, they have unquestionably enabled corruption on the part of R's. Perhaps Booker should have used the term radically extremist rather than corrupt to describe the decisions the conservatives have made. A court with views way out of balance with the public's because of Mitch McTreason's obscene duplicity.
Corrupt because it did not go the way the littles wished for and now they are spitting, name calling and tantruming
 
The practices of some members, notably Thomas, are corrupt. Worse still, the Court refuses to police itself in the absence of any governmental body having the power to do so.

As for the recent rulings, they have unquestionably enabled corruption on the part of R's. Perhaps Booker should have used the term radically extremist rather than corrupt to describe the decisions the conservatives have made. A court with views way out of balance with the public's because of Mitch McTreason's obscene duplicity.
What govt body should oversight the courts?
 
The practices of some members, notably Thomas, are corrupt. Worse still, the Court refuses to police itself in the absence of any governmental body having the power to do so.

As for the recent rulings, they have unquestionably enabled corruption on the part of R's. Perhaps Booker should have used the term radically extremist rather than corrupt to describe the decisions the conservatives have made. A court with views way out of balance with the public's because of Mitch McTreason's obscene duplicity.
This is how authoritarianism come in…fascist lie this poster, who don’t like the court, want some sort of govt body to police it.

When you destroy the courts, you destroy freedom, and a democratic republic…you become authoritarian

He’s projecting after that because it’s beyond radial and extremist to become fascist as he wants
 
And unlike the Senators, they would have term limits of time in office. The 17th Amendment needs to go, and the state legislatures need to appoint Federal Senators so outside forces will have limited say in it.
NO Appointements.
 
Ah yes...the "illegal" Trump agenda! Would you care to expand on that, Berg? You know...give some examples of what's "illegal"?

Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal​

Trade court rules Trump’s replacement tariffs illegal​

Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)​

The Administration’s Drug Boat Strikes Are Crimes Against Humanity​

Members of Congress are wrong to call the strikes war crimes in the absence of an armed conflict, but the strikes are serious crimes under international law.

AI Overview

As of May 2026, multiple actions taken during Donald Trump's second term have been ruled illegal or unconstitutional by federal courts, including 10% global tariffs, attempts to end birthright citizenship, and executive orders altering voter registration. Courts have consistently found that these actions exceeded presidential authority and violated existing law or the U.S. Constitution.

Many Trump Administration Fiscal and Regulatory Actions Are Unlawful​

 
Corrupt because it did not go the way the littles wished for and now they are spitting, name calling and tantruming
Inherently corrupt because they enabled Repub state governments in the south to immediately seek to disenfranchise black voters. A predictable consequence of the VRA ruling the conservatives pretended not to know would happen.

Increasingly corrupt because of the conservative's abuse of the shadow docket to allow the regime to continue legally questionable practices for an indefinite period of time in deference to trump.

The Supreme Court Is Operating in the Shadows — And Democracy Is Paying the Price​


And then there is the United States Supreme Court! It has for decades been one of the world’s great deliberative bodies. A typical legal case, winding its way through at least two levels of lower courts, and then to the Supreme Court, could typically require in excess of a year, and very often two years, if not more, to wend its way through the American judicial process – at least at the federal level.

But now, in the past few years, our Supreme Court has evidently grown impatient with its own deliberative processes. Beginning in the first Trump Term; and then from time to time under the Biden Administration; and now with notable regularity if not abandon, at the beginning of the second Trump Term, the Supreme Court has found a new toy. Knowledgeable observers have coined a catchy phrase for this: the Courts’s “SHADOW DOCKET.”


These are extraordinary steps the Roberts court is taking on politically philosophical grounds, not legal ones.
 

Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal​

Trade court rules Trump’s replacement tariffs illegal​

Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)​

The Administration’s Drug Boat Strikes Are Crimes Against Humanity​

Members of Congress are wrong to call the strikes war crimes in the absence of an armed conflict, but the strikes are serious crimes under international law.

AI Overview

As of May 2026, multiple actions taken during Donald Trump's second term have been ruled illegal or unconstitutional by federal courts, including 10% global tariffs, attempts to end birthright citizenship, and executive orders altering voter registration. Courts have consistently found that these actions exceeded presidential authority and violated existing law or the U.S. Constitution.

Many Trump Administration Fiscal and Regulatory Actions Are Unlawful​

Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal​

Trade court rules Trump’s replacement tariffs illegal​

Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)​

The Administration’s Drug Boat Strikes Are Crimes Against Humanity​

Members of Congress are wrong to call the strikes war crimes in the absence of an armed conflict, but the strikes are serious crimes under international law.

AI Overview

As of May 2026, multiple actions taken during Donald Trump's second term have been ruled illegal or unconstitutional by federal courts, including 10% global tariffs, attempts to end birthright citizenship, and executive orders altering voter registration. Courts have consistently found that these actions exceeded presidential authority and violated existing law or the U.S. Constitution.

Many Trump Administration Fiscal and Regulatory Actions Are Unlawful​

So two Obama appointed federal judges ruling that Trump's tariffs are "illegal" means his agenda is illegal? That's funny, Berg! All you've proven is that the left will do everything they can to keep Trump from being successful even though the tariffs that he put in place have been wildly successful. It's simply more of the same lawfare that you use whenever you don't get your way! Go find an Obama or Biden Federal judge and get them to throw up another roadblock to things like fixing the border crisis that you on the left gave us in the first place!
 
So two Obama appointed federal judges ruling that Trump's tariffs are "illegal" means his agenda is illegal? That's funny, Berg! All you've proven is that the left will do everything they can to keep Trump from being successful even though the tariffs that he put in place have been wildly successful. It's simply more of the same lawfare that you use whenever you don't get your way! Go find an Obama or Biden Federal judge and get them to throw up another roadblock to things like fixing the border crisis that you on the left gave us in the first place!
Well, no. trump's Supreme Court also ruled his tariff scheme was illegal.

AI Overview

Following a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that deemed them unconstitutional, the U.S. government is refunding over \(\$166\) billion in illegal tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

But I can see from your reply you are one of those trumples who can not bring themselves to acknowledge how many illegal and corrupt actions the regime has taken or have been blocked by the courts.

AI Overview

In early 2026, federal courts ruled against key components of the Trump administration's immigration policies. A Massachusetts judge declared it illegal to deport migrants to "third countries" without due process, and another ruling restored legal status to nearly 900,000 migrants whose parole was revoked.

Court Finds Trump’s Use of Soldiers in Los Angeles Is Illegal

There is no shortage of examples of the regime's illegality. Just as there is no shortage of your capacity to deny the truth staring you in the face.
 
The Roberts court has always been corporate stooges. We knew it when CU came down and allowed nearly unlimited dark, untraceable money, to flow into the coffers of partisans on both sides of the isle.
 
Inherently corrupt because they enabled Repub state governments in the south to immediately seek to disenfranchise black voters. A predictable consequence of the VRA ruling the conservatives pretended not to know would happen.

Increasingly corrupt because of the conservative's abuse of the shadow docket to allow the regime to continue legally questionable practices for an indefinite period of time in deference to trump.

The Supreme Court Is Operating in the Shadows — And Democracy Is Paying the Price​


And then there is the United States Supreme Court! It has for decades been one of the world’s great deliberative bodies. A typical legal case, winding its way through at least two levels of lower courts, and then to the Supreme Court, could typically require in excess of a year, and very often two years, if not more, to wend its way through the American judicial process – at least at the federal level.

But now, in the past few years, our Supreme Court has evidently grown impatient with its own deliberative processes. Beginning in the first Trump Term; and then from time to time under the Biden Administration; and now with notable regularity if not abandon, at the beginning of the second Trump Term, the Supreme Court has found a new toy. Knowledgeable observers have coined a catchy phrase for this: the Courts’s “SHADOW DOCKET.”


These are extraordinary steps the Roberts court is taking on politically philosophical grounds, not legal ones.

Inherently corrupt because they enabled Repub state governments in the south to immediately seek to disenfranchise black voters.

disenfranchise: deprive (someone) of the right to vote:

Wrong. Black voters are still allowed to vote.
 
Back
Top Bottom