Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bernie Sanders Touts Marxist Economists
- Thread starter American_Jihad
- Start date
Hey DumbAss, no history of communism, f-ing moron...ANYWAY...there are no serious Marxist economists like the old days. And Marx himself was just guessing in theory. There being no history of communism.Why would he? Marxs was fucked in the head, and Very well could be, being assfucked by Hitler right now.
No history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #63
Hey DumbAss, no history of communism, f-ing moron...ANYWAY...there are no serious Marxist economists like the old days. And Marx himself was just guessing in theory. There being no history of communism.
No history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.
The federal government has no ability to make "class"…
The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…You don't even make any sense. The GOP is KILLING regular folks for 35 years. Services getting fewer and more expensive, pay stagnating...But you hate Clooney for some GD reason. Hater dupes!WTF did that mean. ANYWAY, Hollywood Dems want to raise taxes on themselves and bring back services and infrastructure we had before RAYGUN tax policy...
Why don't you get a bobble head doll of George Clooney and shove him up your ass if you like them so much…
No history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.
The federal government has no ability to make "class"…
We used to have cheap college and training for good jobs and great infrastructure and better pay before Reaganism. Which is taxing the richest 30% instead of 50%.
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #66
Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…You don't even make any sense. The GOP is KILLING regular folks for 35 years. Services getting fewer and more expensive, pay stagnating...But you hate Clooney for some GD reason. Hater dupes!
Why don't you get a bobble head doll of George Clooney and shove him up your ass if you like them so much…
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #67
Reagan was just another career politician, like all the rest…We used to have cheap college and training for good jobs and great infrastructure and better pay before Reaganism. Which is taxing the richest 30% instead of 50%.The federal government has no ability to make "class"…Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for itNo history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Hey DumbAss, no history of communism, f-ing moron...ANYWAY...there are no serious Marxist economists like the old days. And Marx himself was just guessing in theory. There being no history of communism.Why would he? Marxs was fucked in the head, and Very well could be, being assfucked by Hitler right now.Have you ever read anything from Marx you dumb hickSanders brother is the real socialist/commie...
Bernie Sanders Touts Marxist Economists
America's most prominent Marxist economist backs Bernie
February 23, 2016
Daniel Greenfield
In response to criticism of his financial proposals, the Bernie Sanders campaign posted a list of “economists and financial experts” who support his plans.
Left-wing websites describe it as a list of the “nation’s top economists”, but it includes financial planners, some with no degree in economics at all, an instructor at Chemeketa Community College, and PhD candidates, including Mohammad Moeini-Feizabadi, an Iranian PhD candidate studying Marxian Political Economy. Also present is Michael Meeropol, the son of the Stalinist atom bomb traitors.
...
The focus on Marxism is pervasive among many of the names on the Bernie Sanders economist list.
John Weeks is described as a Marxist who has called for the “nationalization of finance” so his appearance on the list is not terribly surprising. Weeks is a Sanders fan and wonders whether “his class-focused political message can realize the long term dream of American populist progressives.”
Antonio Callari is the author of “Marxism in the Postmodern Age: Confronting the New World Order,” Nancy Folbre has been described as a Marxist and Yavuz Yaşar is the author of “Teaching Macroeconomics by Bringing Marx into the Classroom.” Ilene Grabel appeared at Marxism Now, a forum sponsored by Rethinking Marxism, a publication to which many on the Sanders list had contributed.
...
Bernie Sanders supporters are told that they will only be getting the same style of Socialism that has failed in Western Europe, but it is disturbingly possible that they will instead be getting the style of Socialism that had to be violently overthrown in Eastern Europe.
Larry Sanders, the brother of Bernie who had a huge influence on his politics, said that his brother will “flex his muscles” and go big, no matter what Congress or even the Democratic Party might say. According to him, Bernie Sanders believes that “the cause of socialism” is more important than anything else. He also describes turning on Bernie to his studies of “Marx and Hegel” to “help him get started.”
A discerning reader may have noticed that many of the names on the list of economists are foreign. There is an extensive organization abroad aiding the Bernie Sanders campaign. It includes the “Corbynists,” the worst elements of the radical left in the UK, who are openly supportive of Islamic terrorism, hate America and Israel, and promote a radical Marxist economic program. They are considered well to the left even within Labour. Their support means that Bernie Sanders isn’t just too radical for the Democratic Party, but for many European Socialists.
...
Bernie Sanders Touts Marxist Economists
Good movie tho! Go back and watch it like a Social Democrat.
It's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…You don't even make any sense. The GOP is KILLING regular folks for 35 years. Services getting fewer and more expensive, pay stagnating...But you hate Clooney for some GD reason. Hater dupes!
Hey DumbAss, no history of communism, f-ing moron...ANYWAY...there are no serious Marxist economists like the old days. And Marx himself was just guessing in theory. There being no history of communism.
No history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
That the country cannot possibly afford…
The poor GOP rich can't like before Reagan, the poor things...
He cut taxes on the rich too much, and hurt the nonrich and started this gd propaganda....Reagan was just another career politician, like all the rest…We used to have cheap college and training for good jobs and great infrastructure and better pay before Reaganism. Which is taxing the richest 30% instead of 50%.The federal government has no ability to make "class"…Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #72
Socialized medicine will destroy millions… FactIt's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #73
No history of communism in his day obviously. He thought socialism led to communism. Just the opposite. The embourgeoisement of the working class ENDS the motive for revolution. Dupe. lol
Socialism is for the gullible and weak... go for it
and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
That the country cannot possibly afford…
The poor GOP rich can't like before Reagan, the poor things...
There is no reason for success if the federal government takes it all... fact
Lol
I don't think you understand a lot of it...Family of four, you get subsidies to help pay, for example. The COST of care is the problem- twice as much as anywhere else.Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…You don't even make any sense. The GOP is KILLING regular folks for 35 years. Services getting fewer and more expensive, pay stagnating...But you hate Clooney for some GD reason. Hater dupes!
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #75
He was no different than the rest of them, all career politicians are the sameHe cut taxes on the rich too much, and hurt the nonrich and started this gd propaganda....Reagan was just another career politician, like all the rest…We used to have cheap college and training for good jobs and great infrastructure and better pay before Reaganism. Which is taxing the richest 30% instead of 50%.The federal government has no ability to make "class"…Embourgoisement = make middle class. As opposed to the GOP making the middle class poor.and mainly the unfortunate...a safety net.
How? Our medicine/care is just too expensive and greedy.Socialized medicine will destroy millions… FactIt's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #77
Why don't people pay for their own shit? Socialism encourages dependence… Independence is not tolerated in a socialist society.I don't think you understand a lot of it...Family of four, you get subsidies to help pay, for example. The COST of care is the problem- twice as much as anywhere else.Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisionsMe too. But good government is NOT big government. They could legalize POT and half empty the prisons and cut the number of cops. Or decriminalize and treat some drugs cut another quarter of it. That's BAD big gov't.The larger the federal government the more it's against my interests…
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #78
Socialism kills the spirit of the individual… there's no reason to live without individuality and freedom.How? Our medicine/care is just too expensive and greedy.Socialized medicine will destroy millions… FactIt's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...I do agree with you mostly there. Another good thing would be to keep the federal government out of all financial And medical decisions
There is no loss of freedom. Individuality is just an American thing.Socialism kills the spirit of the individual… there's no reason to live without individuality and freedom.How? Our medicine/care is just too expensive and greedy.Socialized medicine will destroy millions… FactIt's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...The only medical decision you hate is the mandate. Obama at first didn't want that. I'm afraid single payer and more regulation of Big Health will be necessary to get costs down...
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
- 1,940
- Banned
- #80
We have no freedom now, pure socialism would make this country a prison.There is no loss of freedom. Individuality is just an American thing.Socialism kills the spirit of the individual… there's no reason to live without individuality and freedom.How? Our medicine/care is just too expensive and greedy.Socialized medicine will destroy millions… FactIt's so expensive that that doesn't work as a system. Hey good luck- it's the American way. But the PROBLEM here is how ridiculously expensive doctors, drugs and hospitals are. My father the surgeon was alone around here to be for universal health care. They're all GOP bastids lol...Millions will not be able to survive in such a overbearing controlling system. I have no right to healthcare, the only right I have when it comes to healthcare is to earn it...
Without the individual we have nothing…
Similar threads
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 345
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 201
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 286
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 199
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8137
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-