Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I read it and his every prediction failed.Anyone who's read Das Kapital knows that Marx predicted where we would be today, in the Usury States of America.
Some people apparently think that while the American people have been dumb enough to become debt slaves, they could have the intelligence to live in a stateless, classless, moneyless society.Anyone who's read Das Kapital knows that Marx predicted where we would be today, in the Usury States of America.
Once again, your ranting on and on and changing subjects just show poor writing skills. You babble. You could not pass a high school composition class.
It does seem unusual that a CNC operator would also be a coder. I've worked as an 'Engineering/Technician' on CNC machines. Coders never operate them. I may have physically built the electrical and electronics parts, while machinists built the mechanical parts, but the coders never touched the machines. Odd that you would work as an operator if you had coding skills.
Tin Foil Hat much?
Your first point is nonsense. There was no 'Workers Democracy' in the USSR. There may have been in Caledonia during the Spanish Civil War, but not in the USSR. You see, people aren't fooled by Communist propaganda and lies. We know what Democracy is, and while Communists may talk of 'Workers Democracy' it was nothing but a lie.
Wait I'm wrong. Communists were known to have open discussions, then they executed everyone that disagreed with them, then they held there votes.
Did the millions of people in the USSR that were forcibly relocated and those that died due to the relocation enjoy your 'Worker Democracy'?
Basically, they beat the horse to death, then called it a unicorn.
As for your points 2-5, I've already acknowledged that the USSR did provide for every major economic need of those people who were obedient and they didn't arrest or execute. BUT, all those major economic needs could be provided by Liberalism and Democratic-Socialism without the authoritarianism.
Point Number 5. There were no political OR economic rights in the USSR. Ownership was forbidden for almost everything. The government seized ownership of every significant asset. So if your saying that there were economic rights, they were only for the conformist sheep that had not yet been slaughtered - and those 'rights' went only as far as the government permitted - which means that they were not 'Rights' at all.
Point 7 is circular logic. They had phony Unions that were controlled by the Communist party - that's not a Union. I'm sure that minor grievances where conceded, but anybody that made any substantial problems were dealt with severely.
Your cherry picked history of Stalin's persecutions kind of leaves out a few million people. You don't even mention Beria. Not a very convincing assessment.
In short you propose a totalitarian police state, which murders all that dissent, which has no economic, political or personal freedoms, but only doles out some economic support to the people who are too scared to dissent. You promote a one party state where the government seizes all substantial properties.
Then say that you are for 'True Democracy'
You may be a true socialist in that you want to seize all property, it may be true that I'm not a true socialist because I believe in the rights of the individual and of property ownership. Neither I nor anyone else could give a damn about what a 'True Socialist" is.
Liberals and Democratic socialists have been very successful in creating a very high standard of living everywhere that they have been politically successful (Like most of Western Europe).
We have never succeeded in the U.S. because the Fascist/Capitalists have blocked us - and the primary cause of their blocking us is because of people like you promoting a brutal and idiotic form of government that scares the daylights out of the majority of Americans and gives any form of Liberalism and Social Democracy an bad name.
Once again, your ranting on and on and changing subjects just show poor writing skills. You babble. You could not pass a high school composition class.
It does seem unusual that a CNC operator would also be a coder. I've worked as an 'Engineering/Technician' on CNC machines. Coders never operate them. I may have physically built the electrical and electronics parts, while machinists built the mechanical parts, but the coders never touched the machines. Odd that you would work as an operator if you had coding skills.
Basically, they beat the horse to death, then called it a unicorn.
As for your points 2-5, I've already acknowledged that the USSR did provide for every major economic need of those people who were obedient and they didn't arrest or execute. BUT, all those major economic needs could be provided by Liberalism and Democratic-Socialism without the authoritarianism.
Point Number 5. There were no political OR economic rights in the USSR. Ownership was forbidden for almost everything. The government seized ownership of every significant asset. So if your saying that there were economic rights, they were only for the conformist sheep that had not yet been slaughtered -
and those 'rights' went only as far as the government permitted - which means that they were not 'Rights' at all.
Point 7 is circular logic. They had phony Unions that were controlled by the Communist party - that's not a Union. I'm sure that minor grievances where conceded, but anybody that made any substantial problems were dealt with severely.
Your cherry picked history of Stalin's persecutions kind of leaves out a few million people. You don't even mention Beria. Not a very convincing assessment.
In short you propose a totalitarian police state, which murders all that dissent, which has no economic, political or personal freedoms, but only doles out some economic support to the people who are too scared to dissent. You promote a one party state where the government seizes all substantial properties.
Then say that you are for 'True Democracy' You may be a true socialist in that you want to seize all property...
it may be true that I'm not a true socialist because I believe in the rights of the individual and of property ownership. Neither I nor anyone else could give a damn about what a 'True Socialist" is.
Liberals and Democratic socialists have been very successful in creating a very high standard of living everywhere that they have been politically successful (Like most of Western Europe).
We have never succeeded in the U.S. because the Fascist/Capitalists have blocked us - and the primary cause of their blocking us is because of people like you promoting a brutal and idiotic form of government that scares the daylights out of the majority of Americans and gives any form of Liberalism and Social Democracy an bad name.
Some people apparently think that while the American people have been dumb enough to become debt slaves, they could have the intelligence to live in a stateless, classless, moneyless society.
So we're not in debt up to our eyeballs?I read it and his every prediction failed.
Exactly the opposite has happened