Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If the pregnancy endangers the life and limb of the woman, it is legitimate self-defense, IMO.Are rape, incest, age, life of a woman, inheritable diseases, reason for abortion? Have you ever been sexually assaulted? Did your brother have sex with your daughter? Have you ever been or know a woman that had to choose between her child or herself? Do your children stand to inherit disease? Please choose yes or no on the poll. All comments are appreciated.
Life of the mother onlyAre rape, incest, age, life of a woman, inheritable diseases, reason for abortion? Have you ever been sexually assaulted? Did your brother have sex with your daughter? Have you ever been or know a woman that had to choose between her child or herself? Do your children stand to inherit disease? Please choose yes or no on the poll. All comments are appreciated.
An abortion is between a woman, her Doctor, and her God. It's no business of the hypocritical right.Are rape, incest, age, life of a woman, inheritable diseases, reason for abortion? Have you ever been sexually assaulted? Did your brother have sex with your daughter? Have you ever been or know a woman that had to choose between her child or herself? Do your children stand to inherit disease? Please choose yes or no on the poll. All comments are appreciated.
What excuse can you come up with for not aborting the children of captive women forced to give birth?I think the decision is between the woman and the man. If it was a case of rape then it is hers alone.
You were forcibly and brutally raped by an idiot hillbilly escaped from a mental institution.Justifiable Reasons for Abortion
What about women forced to give birth and forced to raise those children? Is there a good reason for not aborting these products of violent rape?If it can be proven rape and we force the birth then pay the woman like 25 grand to not abort. B
Child support for fetuses!The battle for civil rights is universal and timeless. Any time there is injustice, where the majority oppresses the minority (and that can even include a minority oppressing a majority), where “might makes right” is used to justify oppression, the fight for civil rights and liberties must be pursued.
Equal rights means that: equal rights. In regards to a pregnant mother and her preborn child, equal rights means we treat them equally and do everything to secure and protect those rights for both. One doesn’t supersede another’s rights. Abortion advocates only advocate for one over the other. The abortion abolitionist advocates for all.
Now for the EXCEPTIONS TRAP
Some of the oft-cited exceptions that many will embrace, such as rape and incest, must be addressed, and we must not fall into a trap that would deny equal protection based on tragic and tempting circumstances.
While it is unfortunate and tragic that a rapist can put a woman into a situation not of her own choosing, and it is understandable that a woman would not want to bear the pregnancy and birth of a child from that scenario, it is wrong to terminate the life of the innocent child, who is guilty of nothing. If anybody is to be terminated, that would be the rapist. Ironically and hypocritically, the pro-abortion/anti-death penalty person would spare the life of the rapist and look the other way for the termination of the innocent child. Terminating the child will not erase the memory of the rape. What will happen is now she will have to bear for the rest of her life two tragedies, one of the rape and one of the dead baby. That's the dirty little secret the pro-abortion advocates don't want women to know.
The incest exception: if it was non-consensual, it falls under the rape category; if it was consensual, then it was a choice of the couple. Again, the baby is an innocent victim here. Throwing "incest" into the arguments only serve to pad the excuses and play on peoples' prejudices. The sins of the father and/or mother are not justification for killing the child.
Then the last oft-cited exception is the "health/life of the mother" clause. Civil rights dictates that we work hard to protect both lives in good faith. If for some reason the preborn baby needs to be removed to save a mother's life, and we cannot save the baby after removal, then so be it, as long as it was done in good faith for the sake of both lives.
But a vast majority of the reasons for abortion are because of "inconvenience." How convenient. I'm sure the slave-owners were inconvenienced when the slaves were freed and they lost a lot of free labor to exploit. Like slaves, preborn babies are more than property, to be used or abused by those with power. They are human beings deserving of the civil rights and liberties of all. Anything less would be uncivilized.
The battle for civil rights is universal and timeless. Any time there is injustice, where the majority oppresses the minority (and that can even include a minority oppressing a majority), where “might makes right” is used to justify oppression, the fight for civil rights and liberties must be pursued.
Equal rights means that: equal rights. In regards to a pregnant mother and her preborn child, equal rights means we treat them equally and do everything to secure and protect those rights for both. One doesn’t supersede another’s rights. Abortion advocates only advocate for one over the other. The abortion abolitionist advocates for all.
Now for the EXCEPTIONS TRAP
Some of the oft-cited exceptions that many will embrace, such as rape and incest, must be addressed, and we must not fall into a trap that would deny equal protection based on tragic and tempting circumstances.
While it is unfortunate and tragic that a rapist can put a woman into a situation not of her own choosing, and it is understandable that a woman would not want to bear the pregnancy and birth of a child from that scenario, it is wrong to terminate the life of the innocent child, who is guilty of nothing. If anybody is to be terminated, that would be the rapist. Ironically and hypocritically, the pro-abortion/anti-death penalty person would spare the life of the rapist and look the other way for the termination of the innocent child. Terminating the child will not erase the memory of the rape. What will happen is now she will have to bear for the rest of her life two tragedies, one of the rape and one of the dead baby. That's the dirty little secret the pro-abortion advocates don't want women to know.
The incest exception: if it was non-consensual, it falls under the rape category; if it was consensual, then it was a choice of the couple. Again, the baby is an innocent victim here. Throwing "incest" into the arguments only serve to pad the excuses and play on peoples' prejudices. The sins of the father and/or mother are not justification for killing the child.
Then the last oft-cited exception is the "health/life of the mother" clause. Civil rights dictates that we work hard to protect both lives in good faith. If for some reason the preborn baby needs to be removed to save a mother's life, and we cannot save the baby after removal, then so be it, as long as it was done in good faith for the sake of both lives.
But a vast majority of the reasons for abortion are because of "inconvenience." How convenient. I'm sure the slave-owners were inconvenienced when the slaves were freed and they lost a lot of free labor to exploit. Like slaves, preborn babies are more than property, to be used or abused by those with power. They are human beings deserving of the civil rights and liberties of all. Anything less would be uncivilized.
Are rape, incest, age, life of a woman, inheritable diseases, reason for abortion? Have you ever been sexually assaulted? Did your brother have sex with your daughter? Have you ever been or know a woman that had to choose between her child or herself? Do your children stand to inherit disease? Please choose yes or no on the poll. All comments are appreciated.
Who held them captive? Did you try to do anything about the fact they were held? Sounds like something out of a third world country. I'd like to hear more about who they were and the circumstances of their captivity. Shady example in my opinion.Those who feel that pregnancy as a result of rape should be aborted are just not serious. Or, they are lying. I can think of two women held as prisoners since childhood. They were raped repeatedly and forced to give birth to the rapist's children. Not one of the pro abortionists has called for these children to be aborted. They have capitulated. If it true that these victims of rape can be forced to have these children and forced to raise them, why can't all rape victims be forced to do the same?
