Go Ahead, Remove Roe V. Wade

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Yes, patient. Funny how you are upset about possibly winning.

I'm not upset in the least. I have my personal opinion of abortion but at the end of the day either decision will have zero impact on my life

 

[Papageorgio]

Time to pass laws con-trolling men's reproductive organs.......maybe mandatory vasectomies.

I'm all for it! It would help eliminate future criminals just as Roe v Wade did.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The far right doesn't want women to be equal to men in this country.

No, thats just you and others feeling sorry for themselves and playing the perpetual victim. Sob sob sob.

 

[Papageorgio]

The states have the right to make laws regarding public health, for example sanitation requirements, I would think this falls within that purview, but it could end up decided in the courts

So aborting a child is okay but refusing to inject a foreign substance into your own body is the state's decision and you should have no say on a experimental vaccine is wrong?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Time to pass laws con-trolling men's reproductive organs.......maybe mandatory vasectomies.

I agree that its equal accountability for both. The male who runs away from his responsibilities is just as deplorable as a women ending a life.

 

[bodecea]

Maybe you should keep your legs together or use birth control.

What about men keeping their zipper up?

 

[bodecea]

Many women don’t want to be forced to take a vaccine injection but they don’t have much of a choice there, eh?

Sure they do......and that's part of the reason we can't beat this Corona virus.

 

[Papageorgio]

What about men keeping their zipper up?

You mean actually taking responsibility for their actions and not go with animal urges? What a concept!

 

[Papageorgio]

Sure they do......and that's part of the reason we can't beat this Corona virus.

100% vaccinated will not stop the Coronavirus. The mutations make it impossible to ever eradicate. It mutates much like the flu virus.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Actually, no. The state can not arbitrarily remove fundamental Constitutional rights. It can not reimburse slavery for example.

And where in the USC does it say a woman has a righr to kill her offspring? Implied or no, abortion is morally wrong on all fronts and is the epitome of selfishness and a sin against God.

 

[bendog]

What about men keeping their zipper up?

Winner winner winner. While imo some in the right to life camp are decent people, the basic motivation is at best supporting a paternalistic society, and perhaps even more often that not flat out misogynist. There's no move to require any women applying for public assistance with minor children to submit paternity to a court for ordered support of the father. God Forbid the sperm donor have to step up to the financial plate. All we require is that SHE be poor and without educational and professional opportunities.

What even the best of the right to life folks don't want to face is WHY the founders didn't have anti-abortion laws. It's because they wanted to get laid by slaves mistresses and prostitutes without worrying about anything beyond syphilis. The morality of the right to life movement is boys will be boys but only with "bad" girls, who deserve what "they" get.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And where in the USC does it say a woman has a righr to kill her offspring? Implied or no, abortion is morally wrong on all fronts and is the epitome of selfishness and a sin against God.

An interesting argument could be made using the ACW amendments. That was argued in an interesting mock court argument when I was in law school as a debate.

 

[tahuyaman]

Why is it that liberals think local government is authoritarian , but more power at the federal level is not?

No liberal can answer that in a serious manner.

 

[tahuyaman]

Liberals are part of a death cult. The more innocent babies killed the better. It’s a bonus if those babies are black.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Would you give $2,000 a month so that this woman can provide food and shelter for this child?

Shouldn't the bitch get a job and husband to raise her child with?

 

[bodecea]

You're not very quick on the uptake are you. I didn't ask for your unsolicited response unless your name is C. Clayton Jones. Are you more than his sock puppet. Now run along little missy.

When was the last time you were pregnant?

 

[bodecea]

Alternatively, have a child out of wedlock and you get castrated. Sounds fair.Its a state interest to insure your resources are not diluted on additional children.

Time to pass laws con-trolling men's bodies too.

 

[bodecea]

So aborting a child is okay but refusing to inject a foreign substance into your own body is the state's decision and you should have no say on a experimental vaccine is wrong?

State the law forcing people to get a shot.

 

[bodecea]

Liberals are part of a death cult. The more innocent babies killed the better. It’s a bonus if those babies are black.

Buy more guns!

 

[eagle1462010]

Because fundamental rights should not be decided by states.

The Federalist papers disagree. The Federal power is few while the States are large. Just because the constitution has been basterdized doesnt make it right.