BREAKING: National Democrats Want to Remove and Replace Entire Virginia Supreme Court

“Mister” Spanberger will be happy to lead the democrat jihad to fix the mess they created,


1778536927334.webp
O
 
They lost, they have gone insane with loony ideas to save the overruled redistricting.

They don't care about anything other than raw political power.


...​
Plan #2 is to replace the Supreme Court through retirements presumably by impeaching them and have a CIA officer-turned-governor replace them with a group of Brazilian-type justices along the lines of Alexandre de Moraes, who just makes up lefty rules as he goes along and jails anybody he likes.​
The conversation reflected the desperation and fury that have gripped the party after the state Supreme Court struck down a favorable map that had been ratified by voters. The most dramatic idea they discussed — which would involve an unusual gambit to replace the entire state Supreme Court, with a goal of reinstating their gerrymandered map — drew mixed reactions on the call, said the people, and it was not clear that it would even be viable, or palatable to Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Democrats in the Virginia General Assembly.​
The best way to save Democracy is to go all Bolshevik. Perhaps they could all get competing Hammer and Sickle and Totenkopf tattoos while they are at it, to complete the transformation of the Democratic Party from a crime syndicate bent on pillaging the country through fraud into a full-fledged communist party.​
,,,​

...​



Marxists gonna commie ..
 
Name one time the republicans every asked to pack the courts? Name one time the republicans every threatened to fire an entire court for ruling against them.
Huh? Fire the Supreme Court? :auiqs.jpg: Whodo you claim said that seriously? I mean anybody who would say that was being hyperbolic and upset. No one believe that is a serious option. Except maybe partisan niwtits looking to post HYSTERICAL threads on old, fading, lonely message boards.
 
Name one time the republicans every asked to pack the courts? Name one time the republicans every threatened to fire an entire court for ruling against them.
Remember that time Republicans refused to vote on a democratic SCOTUS nominee?
 
that was not unconstitutional nor illegal.
Neither is expanding the court or lowering the mandatory retirement age of the Virginia Supreme Court.

It’s just gross. Your tolerance for gross political behavior is much higher than ours. In act, you don’t just tolerate it. You celebrate it and reward it.
 
Neither is expanding the court or lowering the mandatory retirement age of the Virginia Supreme Court.

It’s just gross. Your tolerance for gross political behavior is much higher than ours. In act, you don’t just tolerate it. You celebrate it and reward it.
you support the illegal actions of a party that shows complete disdain for the rule of law and the constitution. That you openly support these lawless acts tells us you do not support democracy and support the illegal takeover of the country, Shame on you.
 
What’s the difference between separation and drawing district based on race?
 
you support the illegal actions of a party that shows complete disdain for the rule of law and the constitution. That you openly support these lawless acts tells us you do not support democracy and support the illegal takeover of the country, Shame on you.
Doesn’t sound like you really understand what you’re talking about.

What do you think the illegal actions are?
 
Doesn’t sound like you really understand what you’re talking about.

What do you think the illegal actions are?
they are only talking about firing judges because they didnt get their way. That is a direct attack on an independent Judiciary and you dont mind at all, dont get the ruling you want fire the judges and appoint yes men in their place. tat is illegal as hell.
 
they are only talking about firing judges because they didnt get their way. That is a direct attack on an independent Judiciary and you dont mind at all, dont get the ruling you want fire the judges and appoint yes men in their place. tat is illegal as hell.
The size of the court is determined by legislation. So is the mandatory retirement age.

Why do you think it would be illegal for the legislature to legislate?

Refusing to vote on a judicial nominee isn’t any different. They didn’t want to vote on Garland because Republicans wanted to get their way. The only difference is that you get what you want.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom